Is it normal to get aggressive breast cancer at 33? What might be causing cancer rates, especially among younger people, to climb?

>>510012925 (OP)
I know this person, she’s a lesbian and has never had a man’s seed within her womb, the obvious antidote for hormonal imbalances and cancer. A body not being utilized for its biological purpose, destroys it’s self.

perfectly normal and safe and effective. it's these other things goy

>>510012925 (OP)
>Is it normal to get aggressive breast cancer at 33?
Yes. Humans are born with 70 new mutations that their parents didn't have and we accumulate more as we age. Sometimes these mutations cause cancer.

>>510012925 (OP)
Rare doesn’t mean impossible

>>510013760
>I know this person, she’s a lesbian and has never had a man’s seed within her womb
she's a married weather forecaster
https://www.instagram.com/marielruizwx/

>>510012925 (OP)
>I was in the best shape of my life, with zero symptoms and no family history
Hmmm, it's truly a mystery, well, i think the obvious answer is global warming and carbon dioxide.

>>510014391
Why do some mutations cause cancer and others not? I feel like we have no idea what cancer actually is and how it works.

>>510015607
It depends on what the mutation does, obviously. Your body has a blueprint and cells are told to stop growing. When there is a error in a cell that tells it to keep multiplying it becomes a cancerous growth. These cancer cells can break away and go to different parts of the body and spread the cancer. Most mutations are harmless and get overwritten in your children.

>>510015607
We know perfectly well what cancer is and what causes cancer. It's a numbers game.

Your DNA is constantly being mutated by the environment. If enough mutations stack up in important areas controlling cell division and apoptosis, you wind up with runaway cells that grow unchecked because they no longer respond properly to signals from the rest of your body, and your immune system can't do anything to them because it's designed to ignore your own cells.

You can chain smoke 8 packs a day, sit in the sun until your skin turns to leather, and die at the ripe old age of 120 of heart failure, and you can do literally nothing wrong and get childhood leukemia. It's pure RNG.

PFAs.

>>510016329
>your immune system can't do anything to them because it's designed to ignore your own cells.
that's not correct. The body can normally kill cancer cells, it does so your whole life. Clinical cancer starts when that immune response breaks or is overwhelmed. I wonder what recent thing may have modified people's immune systems?

>>510016270
>>510016329
This smells like pure bullshit and just a cope for how ignorant we are about it.

As far as I know countless cells in your body are constantly becoming cancerous through random mistakes in genes, but your body and immune system eat them and recycle/expel the waste of the eaten cell (autophagy), correct?

But obviously for some reason cancers still happen, i don't think we understand the mechanisms by which this happens.

>>510015607
The jist of cancer is its a result of failed cellular reproduction.

Most mutations just end up with cellular death that is broken down, some end up being identified as foreign and the immune system takes care of it. Actual Cancer is when the mutations end up producing cells that ignore the body's own regulation of cellular reproduction and cease their native function, cuminating in a mass that is alive but only exists to consume resources and reproduce. They end up reproducing so fast the immune system can't deal with it and it interferes with legitimate cellular functions in the surrounding tissue.

What's not understood is why the mutations that result in cancer are so common in small animals including humans.

>>510012925 (OP)
People interact with carcinogens daily more than ever, but it's also just a random chance. You could live in a sterile bubble your whole life and still get cancer if you're unlucky.

>>510012925 (OP)
>What might be causing cancer rates, especially among younger people, to climb?
Same thing causing 44 year old former pro-athletes with access to the best healthcare in the world to get both clots and cancer. Gas stoves.

>>510012925 (OP)
>normal
its not common but it has certainly happened to many women thruout the course of history.

>>510012925 (OP)
>cancer rates
im sure it has nothing to do with obesity rates, processed foods etc...there can only be one reason- right?

>rates were rising before 2019

>>510016559
Not quite. To become actively cancerous, a cell has to be able to evade the immune response, which is typically done by avoiding apoptosis, which is the immune system telling it to die.

What you're talking about are pre-cancer cells with some mutations that mark them as an issue to the host, which results in them being marked for death. When marking the cells for death no longer works, and cell proliferation can continue unchecked, you have cancer.

>>510016722
>As far as I know countless cells in your body are constantly becoming cancerous through random mistakes in genes,
Yes. But if you get enough mutations in the same area, you can lose the coin toss and get tumors. Anyone who has cancer and "wins" is at high risk of cancer, because typically the whole area around where they cut the tumor out is pre-cancerous. You can't revert the DNA damage, all you can do is cut it out and hope you cut it out early enough that there's still enough good tissue left to keep you alive.

>>510016763
>What's not understood is why the mutations that result in cancer are so common in small animals including humans.
Because DNA replication isn't perfect. It's good enough to usually give you long enough to have kids, which is all that matters for DNA based lifeforms. The longer you live, the more likely you'll get enough mutations to get cancer and die.

>>510016559
I wonder what recent thing may have instructed people's immune systems at the cell DNA level to create viral spike proteins, of which nobody seems to know what the source RNA used is? I wonder if instructing cells at the DNA level to create viral spike proteins (which it was never designed to do) can go wrong sometimes, hmmm, isn't that what they call cancer? Nah that's just a conspiracy theory it's obviously a lack of a healthy bug-based diet.

>>510012925 (OP)
Being single is like smoking 15 cigarettes every day. My cock could have saved her

>>510012925 (OP)
I don't know anon, do you have anything in mind...?

Obviously not. People forget they already poison most of our food and water, micro plastics are everywhere, we're all vaxed as children. Then you add on the experiment gene therapy 'vaccine' shots and it isn't surprising at all cancer is skyrocketing.

>>510017085
>Yes. But if you get enough mutations in the same area, you can lose the coin toss and get tumors.
That "random" theory of cancer doesn't make any fucking sense, because you are constantly losing the coin toss but your immune system just kills them.
>Anyone who has cancer and "wins" is at high risk of cancer, because typically the whole area around where they cut the tumor out is pre-cancerous.
Then how have people miraculously recovered from cancer without any clinical treatments? It's rare, but it has happened, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

>>510012925 (OP)
A: They know (The scientists and pharmaceuticals)
B: They will never tell us
C: They are not and will not ever look for a CURE.- It's not that they have a cure and you have to be rish to get it, they AREN'T EVEN BOTHERING TO LOOK because it is not and would not be profitable. It would be like wondering why oil companies won't develop technology that produced a stone that could make a car drive for your entire lifetime.

>>510016763
Yes that was how i understood it, but if that's true then you could say that all cancer is simply various catastrophic dysfunctions of the immune system, triggered by random chance, but the same is true of any simple infection at all, so it seems to me that there is something we don't understand or isn't widely known about why and how the immune system fails in the first place, or how to enhance it's responses. People (like in this thread) simply say oh it's all a random dice roll and that's a bullshit myth from the 1950's.

>What's not understood is why the mutations that result in cancer are so common in small animals including humans.
What do you mean?

>>510017422
>because you are constantly losing the coin toss but your immune system just kills them.
You don't get it. Not every pre-cancer cell is recognised. There are lots of failure points, the immune system is far from perfect.

>Then how have people miraculously recovered from cancer without any clinical treatments?
In rare cases the immune system can get lucky. Cancer cells have differing grades of "fuck you" potential depending on their mutation profile, it's not a one size fits all. You go over the threshold, it's cancer. But cells can get way more mutated than that threshold, and generally speaking you eventually get metastasis and it's all over.

>>510017591
Actually it would be extremely profitable, but it would break the monopoly on profits that the patent system provides, since telling people to exercise and drink water can't really be patented.

>>510018116
>You don't get it. Not every pre-cancer cell is recognised. There are lots of failure points, the immune system is far from perfect.
That's the whole point, YOU don't get it, that proves that it's not a random coin toss, and that's it's actually a dysfunction of the immune system, of course there can be different kinds of cancers, that the immune system deals with better or worse, but that's the same with any kind of infection at all.
>In rare cases the immune system can get lucky.
That doesn't make any fucking sense at all under your theory of randomness, if the immune system can just "get lucky", then there must be a way that it "got lucky" and that way can be understood and induced, removing any randomness from the equation.
>But cells can get way more mutated than that threshold, and generally speaking you eventually get metastasis and it's all over.
But you're still ignoring the fact, which you admitted, that if the immune system says "fuck you" then it's immediately game ver to the cancer, all evidence points to the fact that cancer is a malfunction or limitation of the capacity of the immune system.

>>510017085
Some cancers spread like crazy others you can live with for a long time. My brother had kidney cancer in his 30s and is in his 60s now. Some people get prostate? cancer and just live with it (if they are old).

>>510012925 (OP)
Yes it's normal. 33 isn't young and people have always got cancer they just didn't have the internet to tell you about it.

>>510019658
This is a lie cancer rates have gone up even in the last 30 years from studies.

>>510018564
>that's it's actually a dysfunction of the immune system,
No, it's not. The immune system was not designed to deal with cancer, because there was never any real selection pressure for protection against rare genetic mutation. Animals live a lot shorter lives in the wild, humans included, and genetic mutation is the driving force of evolution.

>then there must be a way that it "got lucky" and that way can be understood and induced,
It got lucky by means of the cancer not being that big of a deal. Again, cancer is a big area, you have little baby cancers that still have all the nice little cell surface markers the immune system can use, and you have big "fuck you" cancers that are locked down like fort knox.

In theory, genetic sequencing into immune training could be a viable treatment pathway, but it's prohibitively expensive and not a panacea, it's an individualised treatment, which means you will have to pay an absolute shitload of money for it.

>that if the immune system says "fuck you" then it's immediately game ver to the cancer,
You're misreading me. I'm saying that if the cancer says "fuck you", there's nothing the immune system can possibly do. Sometimes the immune system might have the right memory cells lying around and do a good job fighting off a weak cancer, but that's not the immune system doing a great job, it's you getting lucky.

>>510019113
Yeah, it's all RNG. Get a few point mutations in one spot over another, and your cancer goes from one with a 10 year prognosis to one with a 6 month life expectancy.

>>510012925 (OP)
any vile shit is possible with kikes around

>>510012925 (OP)
This bitch has probably been on birth control for half her life and fucked her hormones. This is why I forbid my gf to ever get on the pill.

>>510012925 (OP)
its always been a thing sadly, i remember around 1997 when my step-dad's sister got diagnosed with cancer at 24 years old. she was dead within 6 months. she had 3 kids was a beautiful white woman. nothing is owed to you be grateful for everyday.

>>510020340
>its always been a thing sadly, i remember around 1997 when my step-dad's sister got diagnosed with cancer at 24 years old. she was dead within 6 months. she had 3 kids was a beautiful white woman. nothing is owed to you be grateful for everyday.
fuck that sucks. Wise words

>>510012925 (OP)
Shit quality food
Too much food
Lack of exercise