Anonymous
ID: rhD7G4Et
7/10/2025, 7:43:03 PM No.510025638
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjmZhytQDss
>https://globalnews.ca/news/11282527/ontario-teen-attack-arrest-charges/
https://archive.is/78uJD
So prior to the attack, the residents of Quadeville were issues a warning to keep their children in doors or under strict supervision. Than after a 9pm police responded to a missing child reported and at approximately 12:30am the police found her on the side of the road with life threatening injuries. At first, the injuries were so horrific it was presumed a wild animal had done it. But immediately upon DNA testing, they have a 17 year old male in custody and all possibility of it being a wild animal are dismissed.
So here are my questions and speculations. How did the police know to there was enough risk present to issue a warning to these residents? And how did they immediately identify the suspect upon DNA testing?
Remember, people being a bit racist is apparently a bigger deal than community safety. My assumption is that a (most likely foreign) family with a known history had moved in to the area prior to the attack. And as for the DNA test, Canadian immigration is required to identify children by DNA sample if sufficient documentation is not present during the process of immigration. So that would explain how they knew exactly who it was.
As for Coulter's Law, it does still apply to this case. But all things considered, it's not even necessary. We can already deduce the suspect in custody is almost certainly a jeet.
>We took 800k jeets in the first quarter of 2025 alone
>https://globalnews.ca/news/11282527/ontario-teen-attack-arrest-charges/
https://archive.is/78uJD
So prior to the attack, the residents of Quadeville were issues a warning to keep their children in doors or under strict supervision. Than after a 9pm police responded to a missing child reported and at approximately 12:30am the police found her on the side of the road with life threatening injuries. At first, the injuries were so horrific it was presumed a wild animal had done it. But immediately upon DNA testing, they have a 17 year old male in custody and all possibility of it being a wild animal are dismissed.
So here are my questions and speculations. How did the police know to there was enough risk present to issue a warning to these residents? And how did they immediately identify the suspect upon DNA testing?
Remember, people being a bit racist is apparently a bigger deal than community safety. My assumption is that a (most likely foreign) family with a known history had moved in to the area prior to the attack. And as for the DNA test, Canadian immigration is required to identify children by DNA sample if sufficient documentation is not present during the process of immigration. So that would explain how they knew exactly who it was.
As for Coulter's Law, it does still apply to this case. But all things considered, it's not even necessary. We can already deduce the suspect in custody is almost certainly a jeet.
>We took 800k jeets in the first quarter of 2025 alone
Replies:
