>>510047012>first she's pro israel>then she opposes israelIt's called Contradictory Flooding. All shills use it.
This tactic—saying one thing, then the opposite, then something else entirely—isn’t just about confusion. It’s about control. It’s used to disarm people who were skeptical or even outright rejecting you. You feed them contradictions not to clarify, but to overwhelm. At first, they don’t trust you. Maybe they push back. So you pivot. You say what they want to hear. Then you contradict it. Then you soften the contradiction. You keep shifting just enough that they can’t pin you down, and eventually, they stop trying.
The chaos creates an opening. They can’t figure you out, but you’re no longer the enemy. You become familiar in your inconsistency. You were aggressive, then apologetic, then thoughtful. They start filling in the gaps themselves. They start rationalizing for you. That’s where trust creeps in. Not because they believe you, but because you’ve made the truth feel too messy to bother with. And compared to that mess, your shifting narrative starts to feel like stability.
This is how people win over the same person who once rejected them. They use contradiction as bait, as fog, as a kind of emotional hypnosis. You’re not trying to be right. You’re trying to be the last one left standing after they’ve given up trying to sort things out. Once that happens, you’re not trusted because you earned it—you’re trusted because they’re tired of distrusting you.
That’s the play. Not to convince, but to confuse until trust seems easier than resistance.