and there was hypothetically someone where money was not an issue. how much would someone with the access to the full epstein files want to release those said files? keep in mind this person is not interested in csam material, only irrefutable proof of persons involved. keep in mind this metaphorical person does not have any party affiliation, only that they want names and proofs involved of what they did.

What?

I think that's enough to drink today bro.
I get that you want to say something about the files but you're not making sense

>>510049608 (OP)
>someone where money was not an issue. how much would someone with the access to the full epstein files want to release those said files?
The issue isn't "how much" but how to spend it dead.

>>510049608 (OP)
Unironically lists of names copied onto thumb drives and dispersed. Hard to trace back to you and once it's out there like that every loose end can't be tied.

>>510049608 (OP)
Idk Elon, you're much more familiar with those circles than any of us would be.