subsidiaries are legal loopholes to monopolies and should be abolished

yes this is true you are correct

>>510073546 (OP)

>monopolies are le bad
Monopoly is the trajectory of capitalist firms and leads to greater efficiency. Monopolies bad is a peak midwit opinion and laws prohibiting monopolies has actually allowed industry exclusive monopolies like utilities to exercise more predatory pricing which otherwise would not have been inflicted had they been absorbed by a larger monopoly since that would hurt their consumer base.

Monopolies flourished under Mussolini and Hitler.

Small businesses consistently underpay their workers and overwhelmingly hire illegals. Consumers chose monopolies by choice because the products and services they provide are consistent and better. Workers are attracted to them because they pay better.

You're just against monopolies because you never actually thought about it, and have an unsubstantiated illogical knee jerk reaction to the word like a redditor foaming at the mouth.

>>510074107
Monopolies aren’t efficient, they’re exploitative. They crush competition, kill innovation, and rig markets with legal loopholes. Consumers don’t choose monopolies, they get trapped by them. Citing authoritarian regimes as a model doesn’t help your case.

>>510074479
Not a single argument. Just loaded labels and false assumptions not based on anything.

>>510073546 (OP)
ha

blooy mary is just
>(((asherah)))
the whore of babylon

thus the association with
>blood
or crimson

>>510074998
It’s not a label if it’s accurate. Monopolies do eliminate competition, do limit innovation, and do rely on legal loopholes like subsidiaries and regulatory capture. Pretending these outcomes don’t exist isn’t an argument either.

>>510075172
>>510075172
>Monopolies do eliminate competition
Incompetent businesses
>do limit innovation
They fuel it, see standard oil and the rapid proliferation of it.
>and do rely on legal loopholes like subsidiaries and regulatory
False. Monopolies are more efficient and without intervention they would be more prevalent. It is antitrust legislation that impedes their growth which is only ever used selectively and corruptly. Regulatory monopolies are not real monopolies, they're artificial ones which arose from the same corrupt political apparatus which created antitrust legislation.

You have a low IQ.

>>510075623
You're defending monopolies by blaming everything wrong with them on the government, while ignoring that most monopolies buy the government. Standard Oil didn’t “fuel innovation”, it crushed competitors, then got broken up for abusing its power. Subsidiaries and loopholes are exactly how modern monopolies stay hidden.

Calling me low IQ isn’t an argument, it’s just you coping with losing one.

>>510073955
I had a dream like this except it was thick ring girl.