>>510107275>The written laws were followedWrong. You're fucking awful at this. Amnesty was handed out like candy, border enforcement was cut back, and criminals that should have been (and still need to be) surrendered to ICE for deportation were just let back into the surrounding communities.
>They did it first and I was against that>Now we're doing it and it's okay because we're doing itStrike that and reverse it and you have your position on all the deportations Obama carried out. Or any president before him.
Operation wetback was lawful and we should do it again.
>And that makes it okay.The immigration law as written and how it is supposed to be enforced has been okay for every Presidential term to date, save for just one.
Which position is least consistent with the history of the country? Yours.
Sanctuary cities at present are actively encouraging their own citizens and their court systems to obstruct the enforcement of Federal laws. That's utterly retarded considering they cheered Federal authorities being used to enforce adoption of Civil Rights in states that were obstructing that change.
You are on the side that is inconsistent and subjective in its interpretations and application of law.