Anonymous
ID: OYTlGG/V
7/11/2025, 6:33:47 PM No.510102966
Is "terrorist" just a glownigger buzzword the kikes use to silent dissent?
Replies:
Thread 510102966 - /pol/ [Archived: 517 hours ago]
Anonymous
ID: OLMSRXDD
7/11/2025, 6:54:38 PM No.510104448
That's always been the case
If they are supported by the US then they are freedom fighters
If they are supported by the US then they are freedom fighters
Anonymous
ID: q9EYEmQA
7/11/2025, 6:59:29 PM No.510104788
>>510102966 (OP)
"Terrorist" has always just meant "whoever Jews don't like". There is no definition of "terrorism", it seemed like "terrorism" might be non-state actors committing military action but apparently there can be "state sponsors of terrorism" so that definition doesn't work
"Terrorist" has always just meant "whoever Jews don't like". There is no definition of "terrorism", it seemed like "terrorism" might be non-state actors committing military action but apparently there can be "state sponsors of terrorism" so that definition doesn't work
Anonymous
ID: rpjEXgbE
7/11/2025, 7:02:03 PM No.510104961
Also to disarm and kill competing factions in the middle east with a combination of "terrorist" and "WMDs".
Anonymous
ID: 55FtvbkX
7/11/2025, 7:07:46 PM No.510105333
>>510102966 (OP)
its a jewish word that didnt exist at all before (((the french revolution))). They always accuse their enemies of doing what they are doing.
its a jewish word that didnt exist at all before (((the french revolution))). They always accuse their enemies of doing what they are doing.