will society ever understand and assimilate pic related?

>>510109518 (OP)
anyone else tired of women looking like plastic dolls?

>>510109518 (OP)
grape?

>>510109518 (OP)
>collectively
thats not how voting works, although i dont hold it against a women for not understanding

>>510109808
If you say "rape" you get banned/flagged or whatever

>>510109518 (OP)
if actual product members of society collectively chose to grape and murder all worthless NEETs in no way could the NEETs stop that
you are given freedom by productive society's tolerance of you

see how you can make that argument about anything, and it doesn't hold any kind of rhetorical weight?

of course you don't, because you're an 90 IQ high school dropout and probably muslim too

>>510109518 (OP)
When society falls apart and there's genuine danger for women again, perhaps they'll understand

>>510110832
What are you talking about? Both statements, yours and his, are objectively right, we owe our freedom to the collective group called society, and within that society there are groups that have more weight than others, like the one you mentioned or men as a whole.

So thanks for proving him right, I guess

>>510109518 (OP)
>dark hair
Rejected. I'm sorry, padre.

>>510109518 (OP)
She is right but I'm also pretty sure she has fetishized the patriarchy since she looks like a blowup doll

>>510109518 (OP)
Truke, Women have no real power and men should stop being cucked

>>510111343
Looks like you missed the point again, probably because "rhetoric" is beyond your vocabulary. Something being technically correct doesn't make it insightful, useful, persuasive, or even worth saying

Heres another one for you:
if nato collectively chose to nuke spain into a crater resembling an overcooked pan of paella, spain could in no way stop that
nato chooses to give spain the right to exist

you're not going to get it even now, are you? if you're white, you need have higher standards for what you consider worth spouting off about

it's a stupid low IQ argument
no "men" don't collectively decide women have freedom
the government do
men lost that role somewhere along the way like women their traditional roles
"men" don't have the monopoly on violence the (((government))) do
(((justice))) do
not you
not men
it's not like that since the french revolution
that argument is so fucking retarded whoever use it is categorically stupid
dumb
an imbecile
past the retard status

>>510111912
>let me make another statement that's objectively true
????

You just summarized the last 70 years of international politics in a single statement

>>510112099
If men wanted they could dispose of the government and justice and every single one of those constructs, so the point still holds

>>510112223
yeah if I had wings I could fly what's your point

>>510112099
You don't have wings, men do exist

>>510109518 (OP)
She is describing India, a known bastion of civilization

>>510109518 (OP)
10 dudes can immediately shut down any feminist protest lmao

>>510109748
No, I want to blast this lazy eye'd whore's hole.

>>510110832
>>510111912
See anon, what you don't seem to understand is that the hole in the OP just had some kind of "woah" moment and never thought in that simple fact her whole life and is making a big deal about it, something we take for granted seems to be a total shock for her

>>510110832
Ok so you agree with the OP then 'same logic
>>510111912
He didn't miss it. You just constructed your argument so poorly that you logically demonstrated OP's point. You might actually be retarded.

>>510112666
>Satan is trolling
get out of here
humans are a tamed species

>>510109808
https://youtube.com/watch?v=EzgUGY36gqM