Is the federal reserve (infinite money glitch) the source of the Jew’s strength? Isn’t it owned by Rothschilds?

Bunp

Further i dug the more ownership becsme vague.

Ive determined it to be a front for the extra dimensional administrators of the realm

Well never find any actual owners just shadows and indirection

>>510123824 (OP)
Dumb slide thread
Private commercial banks and credit unions issue >90% of the money in circulation through lending
Fed is owned by those same banks

>>510124492
Lending doesn’t create money out of thin air. Fiat currencies and central banking do.

>>510124690
Banks do not lend out money they already had, banks create new money by lending. They add a deposit liability to the borrower’s account, and the borrower then spends that deposit as if it was money. Banks don’t send reserves to each other for every transaction, they batch-process most transactions at the end of the day, only sending what they owe in net. Most of the dollars that are spent in our economy are units of bank credit, a liability of some private bank or credit union, and credit is only created during lending— bank adds +1 to assets (loan contract) and +1 to liabilities (deposit), borrower adds +1 to assets (deposit) and +1 to liabilities (loan contract) —both balance sheets balance, the new money (deposit) is spendable, and no government entity or Federal Reserve Bank was involved.

>>510124352

>>510124690
Nah that anon is correct
Lo down banlies.org

Money for the past 150 years at least was mostly borne through the private extension of credit

You dip into your wallet to lend
They click money gun

>Is the federal reserve (infinite money glitch) the source of the Jew’s strength?
yes
>Isn’t it owned by Rothschilds?
yes

>>510126055
Banklies.org*

>>510126055
That makes no sense. How could private banks have the power to create money? The money supply is something only the (((government))) can control.

>>510125838
Fudging n-dimension Matryoshka dolls all the way around

>>510126509
Negative, key lies in the implementation of fractional reserves (though not fractional as the reserve req is 0% now)

They print on loan and burn on repayment (just not the interest)

Consider pic related, you think there is an api the banks hit in basel or something if they punch too many zeros in?

yes jews dont work so the only way for them to get money is via printing, usury and fees

abolising the FED means jews becoming poor and homeless goy, in worst case they get forced to work in work camps, they rather starve than work btw, talmud prohibits them from working for the goyim

>qiestionthread

>>510126925
and returns an error? No whats commercial bank paper is floated around as legal tender, you can reference the article that dug into banking source code (surprised that its not open source)

>>510123824 (OP)
The Coinage Act states that only silver and gold are lawful money. The Federal Reserve creates debt notes, which are neither money nor currency.

>>510126509
banks use the money you have in your account and lend it to other people

>>510127264
Rothschilds own gold. They literally set the price for gold.

>>510125773
While this is entirely correct, it's meaningless unless you specify what prevents a bank to create as much of this funny money as it wants

>>510126509
Government is only allowed to create coinage as money directly. Quarters, nickels, dimes, and pennies are the only forms of money that are direct liabilities of the U.S. Treasury. Cash is a liability of the Federal Reserve Banks, which ostensibly is supposed to remit profit to the Treasury but pays a 6% dividend to its member banks (way above Treasury bond rates). The member banks, every entity in America with a banking license, collectively own the Fed’s balance sheet. Beyond cash and coins, most money (by far) exists only as digital records on banks’ balance sheets, just a unit of accounting for the banks’ liabilities to the public. Even the “money” sitting in your checking account is just a record of how much your bank owes you, it’s not sitting in a vault somewhere.

>>510123824 (OP)
In spite of what any of you will say, having some sort of Federal Reserve is the correct action. In the US, we had centuries to experiment with all other forms of banking; and only the Federal reserve can withstand the major problems faced by the other methods (panics, illiquidity, runs).

The Fed is not perfect, but I think that is more a result of it's so-called 'duel mandate' (the underlying principles set by the elected leadership for the fed to follow). Currently, the duel mandate is 'price stability and maximum employment"; but that itself creates future problems, mainly the need to keep generating debt to keep both legs of its mandate.

The gold standard cannot work; simply because wealthy foreign nations (especially oil or mineral nations) will simply horde the world's supply until it is gone. Free banking can't work because there is no backstop against cascade collapses (like in the 1840's); and an independent treasury (like we had before the fed), while the safest of all; cannot accommodate large-scale expansions in the economy.

For a good example of the pros and cons, just look at the history of banking in the US from the Second Bank of The United States until the passage of the federal reserve act.

>>510123824 (OP)
>Is the federal reserve (infinite money glitch) the source of the Jew’s strength? Isn’t it owned by Rothschilds?
Yes.

>By a continuing process of inflation, government can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. - John Maynard Keynes

https://archive.org/details/a-history-of-central-banking-and-the-enslavement-of-mankind-pdfdrive

>The governments of the Nations forming the Universal Republic will all pass effortlessly into Israelite hands, thanks to the victory of the proletariat. Individual property can then be abolished by the rulers of the Judaic race who will administer the public fortune everywhere. In this way the promise of the Talmud will be fulfilled, that when the Times of the Messiah have come, the Jews will hold under their keys the property of all the peoples of the world.

> Baruch Lévy, in a letter to Karl Marx.

https://craighutchinson.substack.com/p/the-secret-origins-of-bolshevism
https://archive.is/wV8ay

>>510127737
>In spite of what any of you will say, having some sort of Federal Reserve is the correct action. In the US, we had centuries to experiment with all other forms of banking; and only the Federal reserve can withstand the major problems faced by the other methods (panics, illiquidity, runs).
But it needs to be owned by the US government as a treasury institution. Not owned by a few private families.

>>510123824 (OP)
It's the most important physical control mechanism. That's why every place that issues currency pays a bunch of law enforcers and soldiers in said currency. But don't overlook their claim to be God's Chosen People. That's the same trick Kings play on subjects to justify conquest, bans on speech, who may do business, etc. Without the divinity deception regular people begin to ask for a turn issuing currency. And that's a no, no. A big, big, no, no.

It's time to nationalize the Federal Reserve. Britain did theirs in 1946.

>>510127363
Liquidity concerns are the only major restriction on bank lending. A bank doesn’t “need” to have a single dime in its vaults, but it’s probably safe to keep a certain amount in reserve. Banks also agree to adhere to Basel III capital requirements, which while not legally binding serve as a signal that the bank is safe enough to keep deposits with. Basel III requires a minimum loan capitalization of 4.5% with added buffers depending on the risk of the loan. Most major banks operate around 5% capitalization, and local credit unions usually run around 10-15%.

>>510125773
Parasite shill. Without government or illegal activity, banks have to account for everything they lend and don't create money. Governments do.

The national debt is never getting paid back in any way. It's just a number that goes up when they produce inflation by printing money.

>>510123824 (OP)
>Isn’t it owned by Rothschilds?
The FED is owned by banks that are mostly owned by the Vatican.

https://old.bitchute.com/video/s8B3caA1hcrf/

>>510128085
>The FED is owned by banks that are mostly owned by the Vatican.

The Roman Catholic Church is the whore of Babylon.

>>510124352
the ownership structure is indirect. it's not just 100% shares owned by mr. noseburg rothschild, CEO of judaism.
all the banks (that matter) in a regional federal reserve banks area own the shares of the regional bank. so JPM, goldmankikes, etc. have the shares of the NY fed (which is really the center of operations).
so the question is, who owns the banks that own the fed? who are JPM's top 5 largest shareholders?

>>510128020
>Liquidity concerns are the only major restriction on bank lending.
Right. So we're back to fractional reserve banking
> Basel III capital requirements
and central bank primacy
You see?
The bottlenecks are the system

>>510127928
>>510127928
great book. required reading for all goyim

>>510124690
Yes it does
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFDe5kUUyT0&list=PLE88E9ICdiphYjJkeeLL2O09eJoC8r7Dc&index=4&pp=iAQB0gcJCdgJAYcqIYzv

>>510127264
Cool. That means the government can seize all counterfeit money, and put Leinster foe repayment of all interest on all loans, because they are jot legal tender, and their usage is a crime.

PAY IT BACK. KIKES!

>>510128314
The largest shareholders will likely be trusts to hide the owners which are likely elite families. Your pic is probably not far off.

>>510123824 (OP)
it's the only way to make sure the white patriarchy respects trans rights
https://www.bitchute.com/video/udYxLmwxoe82

Federal reserve is just one component. There are many others

>>510127893
I don't know that I would put it that way.

The Federal reserve bank is a semi-private organization controlled by a board of directors who is politically appointed. The stockholders of the bank are the member banks themselves; who hold non-voting shares in exchange for agreeing to participate in the system. Who owns the member banks is up for grabs, as some are family owned, others are publicly listed companies; etc. But the essential control of the fed is in the hands of elected officials, not the member banks, and not the private banks.

There is an interesting plus side of having things set up the way they are now, and it is this...
> if the world blows up and we enter a break-glass moment; the US government has an out, since any debt owed would be to (and through the bank).
> in other words... if the world goes bust the fed goes bust, but the US owes no debt because its only debt was to the fed; and any outside debts were not owed by the US, but by the fed via those foreign entities who chose to buy fed financial products.

With the interesting legal distinction that exists between paper money and coin in the US; the US treasury would land on its feet even if the fed brought down the entire world.

>>510128030
Ah! This anon is aware of the pledge of the zero factor- what the individual must aspire to in order to close the age of the the dateless bank wars and open the age to the universal provinance as so prophised by our ancestors in antquity

I salute you!

>>510123824 (OP)
>Is the federal reserve (infinite money glitch) the source of the Jew’s strength? Isn’t it owned by Rothschilds?

The infinite money glitch is the source of power of european kings.
Rothschilds are british kings bankers.

>>510129277
>the US treasury would land on its feet even if the fed brought down the entire world.
Lmao, no. That's not how that works. No treasury 'lands on its feet' when its citizens have become destitute and nobody wants to lend it against reasonable rates

>>510123824 (OP)
It's similar to the Illuminanti card game. The federal Reserve is like a card one keeps in their hand. It's not the seat of power per say, but it does have some powerful attributes and can absolutely hard counter certain board configurations, but you wouldn't play this card as a kind of "Blue eyes White Dragon" autopwner Trump card

>>510128314
It's the DTCC and DTC who own all shares and enable the fraudulent stock market. They are who controls these symbiotic and cyclic ownership structures.

>>510124492
>Private commercial banks and credit unions issue >90% of the money in circulation through lending
>>510125773
>Banks do not lend out money they already had, banks create new money by lending. They add a deposit liability to the borrower’s account, and the borrower then spends that deposit as if it was money.

This . I think this scam used to be called venecian banking ? or florencian banking? one of those that was quickly banned in Europe because it very quckly and mathematically bankrupts 95% of the population and gives all the money to 5% of oligarchs.

>>510123824 (OP)
The best humanity has to offer is interest.

>>510129680
I would refer you back to American history between 1837-1845; where a vast majority of the population WAS destitute; and when several US states were not only bankrupt, but insolvent. They got through it. It wasn't easy, but they got through it.

I've spent some time comparing the free-banking era of the 1830's to the current federal reserve. Studying the rise and fall of 'wildcat banking' has shown both the strengths and weaknesses of the various systems.

In applying it to the fed; (and if there were people smart enough and cold blooded enough to do what had to be done); a collapse of the fed could be worked out with not-fatal damage to the population and the government. The population would support the way all their debts in now worthless dollars disappeared; and would be willing to put up with cash handouts in new currency in exchange for them still being able to buy food.

The people who would really suffer would be those holding physical (and digital) dollars outside the United States. Their dollars would become worthless; and there would be no bailout for them. In other words:
> population left relatively hold
> money holders wiped out
> money offshorers wiped out

>>510123824 (OP)
It is.
All began on August 15th 1971.

>>510124492
> commercial banks and credit unions issue >90% of the money in circulation
These banks would collapse without a central bank protecting them and without the ability to create infinite credit.

>>510130294
>I would refer you back to a completely different era and money system
I appreciate your referral, but it doesn't support your absurdities in any way
>if the government just gives us food stamps we're ok losing all our savings
Ok cuck, KEK

>>510124690
Today it does.
Because of fiat currency? No. Banks have always created credit first, even under commodity money like gold and a fractional reserve.
Fiat currency and central banking make it a lot easier for them to create credit and reduces their risk, but they have always had the ability to do it.

>>510130401
It was a necessary step at the time. The choice was between letting the Arabs loot all of our gold or stopping redemption in gold. Nixon made the correct decision that keeping the gold was essential.

>>510130606
see, that's where you miss the point. It's not a completely different era of money; it's the time when the same system was tried on a private-bank level.

What were called "bank associations" were owned by private individuals. They were allowed to operate in a fractional reserve system; (where they could issue more notes than they had in money); and they were required to participate in a form of FDIC which (at least in my state), was called the Michigan Safety Fund.

Most of the fears and complaints about the fed today were already played out 200 years ago in Michigan, New York, Ohio, and several other states via the free banking (bank association) movement.

To say that the era holds no value shows a decided lack of knowledge on a subject you have such strong opinions of.

>>510124690
>In the modern economy, most money takes the form of bank deposits. But how those bank deposits are created is often misunderstood: the principal way is through commercial banks making loans.Whenever a bank makes a loan, it simultaneously creates a matching deposit in the borrower’s bank account, thereby creating new money.

>Money creation in the modern economy, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin 2014 Q1, 14 March 2014