>>510157145 (OP)What's the word on top? "Share"? SHARE JEWS?
>>510157284>>510157444The last letter doesn't look like a T, but if you say so...
>>510157145 (OP)Kill the Rothschilds family and who would suffer?
>>510157212We unironically need more jews, blacks and Indians in the US.
I agree with OP's message
To be fair...
It could be declaring:
SHART
JE116
as much as SHARE JEWS or SHARP JE116.
The other vague graffiti under it says "Kansas JEWS" (with a halo over "E"). The graffiti over it says FREE.
So altogether, the message is:
SHART free JEWS
Kansas —> JEWS <—
Kansas Jews, they freely shart.
For those wanting to hide from AI TEXT RECOGNITION...
GOOGLE LENS DECLARES THIS SAYS:
The graffiti declares "SAR" and "Rec 202".
Explanation:
The prominent large letters at the top of the image appear to spell out "SAR".
Below and to the right of the main graffiti, smaller text is visible, which reads "Rec" and "202.".
Which means AI TEXT recognition is shit at recognizing graffiti text (nonstandard shapes with no standard of decorations). Note that AI TEXT RECOGNITION should be able to easily spot any REPEATED pattern of characters, but if those patterns are inconsistent, opportunity reigns.
However, it has beat many horrible cursive samples by using curve velocity as a winner trick.
Graffiti, much like block lettering can be recognized by negative space edge parsing (the block letter Y has a triangle or circle or block in the middle top, the sides are usually a trapezoid mirrored or a opposite triangle pair or a circle.
Getting less rigid on the actual warping of these shapes increases probability recognition. But for now there's a temporary advantage for the graffiti guys.