how come historically revolutions were only successful when they occurred in homogeneous countries?

>>510236779 (OP)
Historically youre a retard and most of you arent white

>>510236779 (OP)
Just a coincidence, goy

>>510236779 (OP)
Syria?

>>510236833
point me to an example where a heterogeneous country managed to successfully lead a revolution
>>510237106
syria failed though

>>510236779 (OP)
America wasn't racially homogenous but even if that were true, it's because racially diverse countries are stronger and more capable of not losing against a few revolutionaries

>>510236779 (OP)
In 1776 America was 1/4 Black with an uncountable number of Indians, you ignorant retard.

>>510237418
thats not how you take consensus on a republic

>>510237418
>1/4 black
>Indians
natives and blacks weren't even involved in the political workings of the country, and america wasn't that diluted to be considered heterogenous during its revolution. it was relatively a homogeneous group of european settlers that were culturally assimilable.

>>510237300
China
Russia

>>510236779 (OP)

Homogeneous in culture is a strong form of unity.