What were his political beliefs?

>>510267734 (OP)
He was an ancient chud.

>>510267734 (OP)
freedom and slavery

>>510267815
no taxes?

>>510267734 (OP)
He wanted to create a mutt empire between the Greeks and Persian not even joking. And his teacher Aristotele was disgusted by it.

>>510267734 (OP)
>I am a God king
He was also blonde or red headed.

>>510267734 (OP)
He was an Aryan warrior. He fought other Aryans in Iran but he respected the native, ancient negroid inhabitants of Jerusalem. Notice the difference in behavior between Aryans and Negroids. Aryans are much more militant/"predatory"

>>510267803
pic related

>>510267734 (OP)
power

>>510268092
That image says otherwise. Since you can't even say yourself, you're likely wrong
>or

>>510267734 (OP)
"gibs me dat"

>>510267734 (OP)
Wanted to become honorary Persian.

>>510267734 (OP)
He was a macedonian brown person. The drinking and talking shit was an integral lart of it.

>>510267734 (OP)
the gay

>>510268197
And glory, to be a god among men, which he was

Trump rapes kids probably

>Susa weddings
It's so over.

>>510268353
The Alexander mosaic was made by the Romans.
Alexander according the ancient writers of his time period are the ones that said he had "lion colored" or "ruddy" hair

>>510267734 (OP)
I think he was a monarchist.

>>510268353
even Plutarch 2000 years ago says the image made him look darker than he was

>>510268656
It's a copy. And why did Romans make him darker?

>>510268773
Plutarch saw Alexander?

Globalist.

>>510267734 (OP)
Fairly civilised
He did let his men take the property of the Persians he defeated, especially their females. He actually captured Darius's wife and daughters although have many wives and daughters the king would have had is an interesting question. He also levelled Gaza so there is that too.
Based if that is the correct term

>>510268913
His globalism was based tho

>>510268898
irrelevant, he had his own sources he was following, the people who made the mosaic didn't see Alexander either

>>510268898
>Plutarch saw Alexander?
He was commenting on the various portrayals of Alexander in his era. He knew form original sources he was 'fair' and that some artists made him look browner that he actually was.

>>510269076
Irrelevant

>>510268898
>Copy
Of what? Something that didn't survive? Can we determine the aging of the painting of the time?
We do have the writings that say it. At any rate, both the original

>>510267734 (OP)
>>510267803
>>510267815
>>510267863


Alexander is the literal grandfather of universalism/liberalism. Alexander wanted to assimilate the whole Middle East & beyond into the Greek identity. Romans continued this tradition by attempting to Romanize the Middle East/North Africa. Old Pharaonic culture in Egypt was dead long before the Arab Muslims showed up, that's why Egyptians & Syrians sided with the Arab Muslim invaders, they were tired of Greco-Roman colonizers. Islam created a dividing wall between Europe & the Middle East/North Africa which eliminated all the race mixing that the Greeks/Romans had been engaging in. Late Imperial Romans genetically clustered with Cypriots (who are closer to Saudis/Bedouins than they are to most Europeans) due to Middle Eastern migrant admixture.

Spaniards/Portuguese went on to become the biggest race mixers in world history by creating 2 majority mixed race continents after the Vatican lied to them & told them that if their faith was strong enough, they'd be able to magically turn the indios into Spaniards/Portuguese. All they did was they created resentful brown mestizos.

>>510269123
your opinion, certainly, Plutarch's, not

Anybody can explain why Romans would make him darker?

>>510267734 (OP)
Fuck Persians

Honestly? I was bored.
>>510269327
>also this

>>510268913
>>510268984

No it wasn't see:

>>510269169

>>510269210

Late Imperial Romans were heavily mixed with middle eastern migrants. Tacitus & Juvenal in first century complained about Rome swarming with Syrians.

>>510269210
All Roman art of that era showed males darker and females blond. It likely they showed him browner to make the point that he wasn't a God although at the time many considered him such.
Gods were shown as the fairest of all

>>510267734 (OP)
His father was either Sabazios(Dyonisus+Zeus/Osiris+Horus) or Amun-Zeus (who in the mysteries turned into a snake, like all Egyptian gods. In fact, intelligent snakes/dragons/reptiles are the most mentioned creatures in mythology and religions)

He was half man, half horned snake

>Olympias, the mother of Alexander the Great, was an ardent participant in the orgies in honor of Sabazius; this gave rise to the legend that Zeus himself, in the form of a serpent, had intercourse with Olympias and that Alexander was the fruit of this relationship; there was even a story that King Philip lost an eye for spying through a keyhole as the deity in the form of a serpent lay with his wife
>The fusion of Sabazius with other Eastern deities, Syrian, Persian, even with the Jewish Sabaoth, belongs to the first centuries of Christianity, although the beginning of this mixture dates back to the 2nd century BC: in 139, the Jews were expelled from Rome for proselytizing among Roman citizens by virtue of a law that condemned to exile those who spread the worship of Jupiter-Sabazius. Blavatsky also identified Dionysus-Sabazius and Jehovah-Sabaoth

>>510269599
That female is not blonde though.

>Made him browner to show he is no God
what the fuck am I even reading?

>>510269521
And that influenced them to paint people darker, themselves, their gods, or greeks. Makes sense.

>>510269521
>Syrians
You get blond Syrians to this day and the Syrians of the Roman era were far removed from what came after.
Consider the transformation of New York in less than 100 years

>>510269210
they probably didn't even think about it or care, the point of the mosaic was to celebrate his major deed, not on making a photorealistic portrait
but the fact that Plutarch, who is writing a biography unlike them, feels compelled to say "hey, by the way, regarding his looks, the depiction from Apelles makes him darker than he was, for he was white(leukos)", is also significative, why would Plutarch do it

>Mars
>God
>darker
> they showed him browner to make the point that he wasn't a God

I'm out. No explanation.

>>510267734 (OP)
He loathed streetshitters

>>510267734 (OP)
Rather left leaning but harder when it works.
In terms of how do i even call that, progressiveness probably center right given the overton window.

>>510269741
Just read the fucking book you retarded Memhet

>>510269897
You think Arabs called themselves brown?

>>510269944
irrelevant question, both Greeks and Romans considered themselves whiter than orientals and darker than northerners, trying to see themselves as the golden mean, but Plutarch doesn't fuck around with terms, uses leukos and even more hints at it being a blood-reddish whiteness on his chest and face

>>510270137
>>510267734 (OP)
So this dude is not white to you, cause his face looks a little burned from the sun?

Swedes doing vacation in south europe tan darker.

>>510267734 (OP)
Alexander didnt die at age 33, he became Sol Invictus, Antichrist

>>510269909
Have you ever heard of a tan?

Also, as I wrote above, Macedonian was the son of Sabazius, and these creatures, when in human form, often have dark, rather bronze skin and can have red hair, like Cuchulainn. This is due to the copper content instead of iron in blood

>>510267734 (OP)
He was so woke that his generals wanted to kill him for favoring persians over greeks

>>510270297
You see,>>510270304
Look, now this dude comes up with a TAN. But Alexander is brown in OP and not a tan? Can you retards make up your mind?

>>510270297
I don't care about your obvious ethnic grievances as a turkish man in Germany, point is, you have an ancient biographer, possibly the most famous ancient biographer there is, taking the time to say he was whiter than that, make of that what you wish

>>510269944
Nobody called them brown until recently. Racism is a hypermodern idea. It wasn't a widespread thing before darwin.

>>510270398
Ok, terrone.

>>510267734 (OP)
He ate human meat, what do you think?

>>510269169
neato, tell me more about what the vatican lying to them

>>510270489
The Germans created chaos at the Coliseum because they thought wogs were being treated with more respect that them.
Wogs have always been looked down on, the Roman Empire was somewhat of an aberration in that respect.

>>510270489
the ancients had some crazy physiognomic ideas though, albeit they were less about race and more about individuals e.g too pale or too dark = coward like the Egyptians

>>510269871

No, original Syrians were Natufians, Syrian Bedouins are the closest to the original Syrians.

>>510267734 (OP)
absolut monarchy + Aristotelianism

>>510270694
That's fair. Being coal black or albino is not ideal in an italian climate.

>>510270562

Vatican promotes assimilation/universalism theory, so the Vatican wanted to assimilate Latin America similar to how it wanted to assimilate the Middle East/North Africa during the Roman Empire.

King Philip ordered all statues of Apollo to be modelled after his son Alexander. Alexander = Apollyon.

>>510267734 (OP)
Have lots of sex and kill lots of brown people

>>510267734 (OP)
he wanted his north macedonia to span the entire world. north macedonians still have that gene

>>510271025
kek, they are slavs.

>>510271167
And germany was created br prussians, who are balts or maybe slavs.

>>510267734 (OP)
Nazi by today's standards. Majority of White male historical figures would become Nazis if they saw modern day.

>>510272404
Why did they call it germany then?