so you're telling me that obama decided one day to craft a list of epstein clients composed almost entirely of his own donors because he was feeling a little devilish, but then he had a change of heart so he decided to destroy or bury it somewhere, but then ghislaine maxwell and jeffery epstein get sent to prison for the crimes that obama coincidently fantasized about in his "epstein list", and then epstein gets murdered in prison, and then pam bondi somehow resurrects those files that obama destroyed and she says that she put it on her desk, but then a glitch in the simulation happens and the timeline shifts which causes those files to suddenly never exist in the first place, pam bondi was just spreading a democrat hoax, and maxwell needs to remain in prison because... reasons?

You lost, tranny

>>510270892
what did i say that angered you?

>>510270805 (OP)
this makes perfect sense

>>510270892
>you lost, tranny

>>510270805 (OP)
pam bondi got out on the spot by questions on live tv and had to generate an answer that sounded good.
>the files are on my desk
ridiculous. obviously not a literal statement. desperate reaching. like saying "the check's in the mail". a cover up for her lack of preparation. hiring a woman and a jeet i to these jobs just casts a shadow over them. how much of this is incompetence vs a deliberate cover up?
why say the list exists, you have it, and you'll release it if it werent true? such a short expiration date on a lie like that. and we saw it
>i physically have the list on my literal actual desk
ok releas it
>i have to wait 2 days 2 weeks a month to do that.
just...take pictures with your phone? obviously a deliberate attempt to stall because some part of the story wasnt true. i just go back to "why are these professional liars telling bad lies?"

>>510271158
yes keep talking about creepy joe biden, but please forget about the whole "epstein" stuff. that was a democrat hoax