4plebs says there were only two dozen threads on Epstein between 2021 - 2024 - /pol/ (#510275334) [Archived: 443 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: z6Jal9ZhUnited States
7/13/2025, 5:49:43 PM No.510275334
1571119838743
1571119838743
md5: 46120266a5da3414914cffb62b080ebc🔍
Why is that? 24 threads in nearly 4 years?
Really tickles the almonds!
There have been more than that in just the last hour, really makes ya think!
Replies: >>510275617 >>510275703 >>510275764 >>510276118
Anonymous ID: o9+tD9ktUnited States
7/13/2025, 5:53:26 PM No.510275617
>>510275334 (OP)
The rape of children and human trafficking just wasn't important last year, now it is. simple as.
Anonymous ID: 3Uk37bQ3Germany
7/13/2025, 5:53:28 PM No.510275621
shills lack the ability to generate an appearance of organic dissent, so they settle for raw noise
Anonymous ID: fI5rApDQ
7/13/2025, 5:53:44 PM No.510275642
>Returning only first 1000 of 7313 results found.
that's threads containing the word "Epstein" in OP
try again kike
Anonymous ID: n1gRcgIiAustralia
7/13/2025, 5:54:32 PM No.510275703
>>510275334 (OP)
nah theres threads all the time on /x/
Anonymous ID: z6Jal9ZhUnited States
7/13/2025, 5:54:36 PM No.510275710
>memeflag
>lies
why would he do that?
Anonymous ID: QqHyjZluUnited States
7/13/2025, 5:55:15 PM No.510275764
>>510275334 (OP)
How stupid do you think people are? These insulting lies are only digging the hole deeper.
Anonymous ID: PPs0mAwZCanada
7/13/2025, 5:59:53 PM No.510276118
>>510275334 (OP)
>Wait on the verdict. There's no reason to make snap judgments.
>Years pass
>It's 2025
>Evidence is destroyed, or omitted from the public.
>Therefore, no crime was committed in the eyes of blind justice.
fin.
Anonymous ID: fI5rApDQ
7/13/2025, 6:00:34 PM No.510276172
1752421783818161
1752421783818161
md5: 3a2d50368fe54290c86db5acd0cb5475🔍
>glownigger "hello fellow 4channelers" frogposter
>lies
why would he do that?
Anonymous ID: z6Jal9ZhUnited States
7/13/2025, 6:08:46 PM No.510276799
7090720250808
7090720250808
md5: 65afba06de4f9f5da6657413e135f80f🔍
>memeflag
>lies again
why would he do that?