>>510288506even if this thread will get torpedoed and this is obviously just a thread to mine data on people who have probably too much info on the event, appreciate this one anon. It's fuckin frustrating that someone can say 'the towers fell as they should have based on how structural engineering works' and have controlled opposition screeching 'BOMBS, THERMITE', and then immediately go 'yeah Bush did it', like that faggot even had any brain left after all the drinking he did after his discharge
All three buildings falling exactly like they should when damaged catastrophically doesn't mean there wasn't fishy shit ahead of 9/11, which there clearly was, and doesn't mean the planes hitting them weren't the most important factor. You can have the planes hit the WTCs, annihilate 50% and more of the structural integrity and STILL have had the Dancing Israelis set up back-up explosions at very specific points in case you needed a second ripcord to pull for your main smokescreen.
The overly long, almost 4-thousand page analysis on the event from the forensic engineers should've been a dead-giveaway that something was off. Having seen some smaller events, the reports can naturally get big, but the length of a Rowling book? Fuck outta here; as if engineers actually have the want & time to type that much shit. I guess the idea that jews were pretty obviously behind it from every angle just doesn't compute in the heads normal people.