>>510317246>so a conference in washington>decided that washington>should be where 77 degrees isNo, it decided where 0 should be. Only when you decide where 0 should be, can you say anywhere else is on any given longitude.
>ut you yourself said they planned to place the prime meridian in a certain location. a small, select group of people. It was actually a conference of people from around the world. You see, nearly every European country wanted to be 0, and nearly all of them were operating as is they were 0. But clearly this could not hold, because one system we ALL agree on is better than 27 systems that don't.
But in your stupid fucking mind of course a secret cabal worked it out that they were going to build Washington at 77 literally decades it was established that Washington would be at 77 for gematria reasons or some such shit
But the fact is you're literally a drooling fucking mongoloid wanking himself off over numbers and his own crackpot fucking theories and history and common sense be fucking damned, right?
>draw a line from stonehenge to mexico city and look what's on the line.You really ought to watch the Horizon demolition job on Graham Hancock because you're as demented as that fucking loon. He argues because some buildings occur in certain locations at Angkor Wat that this means some specious bullshit about an ancient civilisation whereas the produces pulled out a map of New York and were able to match buildings to constellation placements even though the buildings were fucking random like the Post Office and a Railway Station.
The fact is, you can draw a line between just about any two places on a map and find SOMETHING in between you're gonna claim is meaningful.
>whoooooh. Washington is on a straight line between stonehenge and mexico!What do stonehenge and mexico have do with each other? answer: fucking nothing
So what does it mean? answer: fucking nothing
But you're gonna jerk off over it anyway because you're tiny minded sperg