>one but probably more than one of the 16 vaccines required by the age of 2 years old can cause neurological damage. That damage is not Autism, and it shouldn’t be called Autism.

>I half-way suspect that the original Autism paper was put out by the vaccine manufacturers themselves to muddy the waters when internal studies identified that vaccine related brain injuries were happening. It creates confusion in the public about VRBI so that it would be associated with a different and naturally occurring condition. A condition which for understandable reasons has a bit of subjectivity in diagnosis; very convenient if you want to obscure the damage your product does with misdiagnoses.

Is it true pol? Have we been bamboozled by normies trying to claim our autism for themselves?

>>510306538 (OP)
oops I forgot the link
https://atavisionary.com/vaccine-related-brain-injuries-are-not-autism/

>>510306538 (OP)
>Vaccine schedule 3x in 25 years
>Autism rates 5x in 25 years
>Chronic illnesses 10x in 25 years
>VACCINES DON'T CAUSE AUTISM CHUD, THEY'RE GOOD FOR YOU

>>510306837
Learn to read mother fucker. the claim is the brain damage caused by vaccines, which is very real, is not actually autism. Calling it autism is a cope by glowniggers to trick people into thinking it wasn't the vaccines.

>>510306837
>https://atavisionary.com/vaccine-related-brain-injuries-are-not-autism/

Could also be all the neurotoxic and hormone disrupting chemicals in the ground water, the microplastics, the air quality, a whole range of other mediating variables. And it could be ALL of these things together.

There's rarely one factor that leads to these things.

t. neuroscientist

>>510307425
Chemicals messing with hormones definitely could cause it.

But I think with vaccines they probably paid off doctors to misdiagnose a bunch of shit as autism to keep the drug sales flowing cause everyone thought it was just naturally occurring autismos