>CHAT CHAT DOX HIM CALL CPS TAKE AWAY HIS KIDS

What are we supposed to do with people like this?

>>510311499 (OP)
Punch them whenever they show their face in public

>>510311499 (OP)
take away his vape

hes right you know

>mfw a chud bigot tells me children can't consent

>>510311499 (OP)
He's doing it for attention, just like the fake vape pen freak out. you fell for it, and now you post about him here. good job. he's a next gen retard. it's not about being right, it's not about debating good. it's about people knowing who you are, even if there is a negative association.

Faggots like this are outing themselves. Look how this little bitchfaggot folded to niggresses and got his ass talked down to by them because of one white bitch in his inner circle. HIM.

He is a leftist cretin, his side is fucking joke circus of purity testing. There is no escape because things will just continuously get worse as time goes on, because nobody can be THAT hilariously fucking catering to woke troon ideology that changes with every newly made-up microaggression. Plus, he is the enemy of the left, a white man. He has to be literally immaculate in behavior, meaning a nigger worshiper cock smoker.

is this the kid who took a massive shit on ben shapiro's shabbos goy jordan peterstein?
he's okay with me.

>>510311743
Zoomies are the worst generation of people to ever walk this planet

>>510311925
He should rape a child on camera next that would give him so much attention!! All attention is good

>>510311499 (OP)
Oddly, I ended up turning on this guy’s stream completely randomly at the exact moment this whole “call CPS on this freak!!” Thing started happening. I turned it off after going back and listening to the debate again cuz I thought I surely missed something; but alas, I did not. He just chimped out massively over nothing. Never watched him again, what a faggot

>>510311499 (OP)
The
>use ai algorithm to identify your debate opponent then spam a government agency to get his kids taken away
debate tactic is a real game changer
seems like it didn't work, I guess it got patched instantly

>>510311499 (OP)
He’s based fuck cuckservitves

>>510312419
>children can consent

so i guess epstein did nothing wrong.

>>510312402
I suspect using it too often could result in unintended side effects

>>510312567
>epstein did nothing wrong
Das rite

>>510312419
ANXIETY
N
X
I
E
T
Y

PEN
E
N

>>510311743
ITS FOR ANXIETY ITS AN ANXIETY PEN

>>510311499 (OP)
I hate this weak ass bitch
He deserve to get punched

>>510311499 (OP)
I really wish him to end bad bad bad
as a drug addict feminized sissy

>>510311499 (OP)
why tf do you assume people know who that is? at least fucking post a link. also, i really hate the fact that I know exactly what you're referring to :(

>>510312909
>>510312993
I thought this was satire when I first saw it because of his intonation
After this latest thing I feel like he might actually just be that unhinged

>>510313316
One of thos political streamers who misinterpret everything to feel like he won a debate.

https://www.sportskeeda.com/us/streamers/news-what-dean-withers-say-do-alleged-doxing-cps-call-controversy-explored

>>510311499 (OP)
>performative surprise and horror
>twisting other people's words
>putting words in other's mouths
>sanpaku eyes
psychopathic piece of shit
but what else can one expect from a leftist?
would one expect a poisonous snake to be all friendly and cuddly? A rabid dog not to bite? A serial killer to balk at telling a lie?
this guy is completely normal by leftoid standards.

>>510311499 (OP)
Basedboy is 100% right.

Parents should not have the right to sell their kids to pedophiles and beauty pagents.

>>510311499 (OP)
How the fuck does this faggot have an audience? He's even more unlikable than Hasan.

>>510312993
Anxiety pen?

>>510311888
>>510312567
His opponent was a father arguing that he had the right to let old pedophiles taken pictures of his son naked.

>>510313603

>>510313430
Maybe calling CPS was an overreaction, but from your article He didn't misinterpret anything.

>>510313603
THC vape, the little faggot got shitty when someone in his chat asked about his vape. Apparently an anxiety pen and a vape are totally different things (it's a vape with THC liquid).

>>510313577
He is the desperate golden boy to get le white males vote Democrat. Leftist bitchfaggots DESPERATELY need an alpha male, and nobody like that exists on the left.

>>510311499 (OP)

how long before twink here troons out?

how can anyone watch this guy

>>510313577
>How the fuck does this faggot have an audience?

The fat mexican lesbian that the DNC hired to get white men to vote got laughed off the internet.
This twink is the new hire and he wiped out in a week.

I'd do it, but I don't fuck kids.

>>510311499 (OP)
The parents said that it’s up to them to decide if it’s ok for a grown man to perv on their kids and that CP was art. They are clearly a danger to children

>>510313617
they were arguing about consent and dean made is sexual to trap him into a gotcha.

>>510313792
Genuinely how's it so hard to not find a non spastic influencer?

>>510313617
>arguing that he had the right to let old pedophiles taken pictures of his son naked.
That's a misrepresentation.

>>510313617
Not what happened at all.

https://www.tiktok.com/@itsdeaann/video/7525556075295296798

Tiktok is cucked to censorship, but deans new video shows that he was justified.

These parents were defending actual cp (brooke shields photoshoot).

>>510313991

Stop being lazy and fuck some kids you bum.

>>510314219
>These parents were defending actual cp
No they didn't.

>>510313758
What did you understand about this?
I'm curious.

>>510314299
They were saying brooke shields, who was photographed naked at 12 years old in playboy, wasn't being exploited

>>510314219
>These parents were defending actual cp (brooke shields photoshoot).

Everybody consented and then everybody became multi-millionaires.
Those pictures are still widely circulated, they are not CP.

Kinda makes the point.

>>510313530
>Parents should not have the right to sell their kids to pedophiles and beauty pagents.

What a dishonest piece of shit you are. Just like that faggot.

NOBODY was arguing about having the right to sell their kids to pedos. Again using the same bitchy technique. Misinterpret shit and then respond as the misinterpretation was the actual argument.

>>510314405
>They were saying brooke shields
No they didn't. The debate was about Trump being in Miss Teen USA's dressing rooms.

>>510311499 (OP)
laugh and call him slurs

>>510314726
>Trump being in Miss Teen USA's dressing rooms.

A hypothetical about Trump walking into the dressing rooms.

>>510311499 (OP)
>getting doxxed
Imagine putting your life on the internet
bunch of face fags out here

>>510314299
Yes they did dean was righteous in his crusade against that evil
>>510314417
Notice how miggers at every opportunity possible will defend pedo shit it’s no wonder why they defend orange kike for his rape of children and the cover up.

>>510314219
Holy heck, 4M followers. We are so cooked, bros.

>>510311499 (OP)
Well what he did is literally a crime federally, and probably also in his local jurisdiction (state). The state DA should indict him.

Soros DAs are far far worse than most people realize. The entire "justice" system is on its last legs of people taking it seriously at all. There's a reason people feel entitled to take shots at ICE conducting law enforcement operations, feel comfortable storming government buildings, feel comfortable shutting down freeways, etc. Law and order is literally breaking down.

>>510314726
clearly You didn't watch the video: >>510314219

The wife brought up brooke shields in the argument.

>>510314859
Orange kike admitted that he did that it isn’t hypothetical

>>510314859
It's an interview Trump did. He admitted to it.

That said dressing rooms are usually not where people get fully changed.

>>510314219
>bleeping normal every day words
Zoomoids are cooked.

>>510314949
>Yes they did
No they didn't.
>I wouldn't allow it. They have no choice in the matter whatsoever. It's my decision as the parent, and I wouldn't put my kid in that situation. That's why I think pageants are weird in the first place. I would never...

>>510315063
>Zoomoids are cooked.
Its because tiktok demonizes you if you say a naughty word.

>>510314993
>The wife brought up brooke shields in the argument.
It seems like he is presenting the wife's argument not actually showing video of the interview.

That's very clearly in bad faith.

>>510315398
mean to say that tiktok demonetizes you.
Basically the algorithim doesnt like if you talk about suicide or pedophiles and shit

>>510311650
FPBP
No idea what this thread is about or who the OP pic is. But violence works.

>>510315127
>They have no choice in the matter whatsoever. It's my decision as the parent,

The parent shouldnt be able to decide to sell their kids to pedos

>>510315524
>The parent shouldnt be able to decide to sell their kids to pedos
>I wouldn't allow it. They (the other adult) have no choice in the matter whatsoever. It's my decision as the parent, and I wouldn't put my kid in that situation. That's why I think pageants are weird in the first place. I would never...

Is it genuinely hard to understand that being an obnoxious shit and interpreting arguments in poor faith makes you a bitch?

>>510315459
You can literally hear her talking to dean in the recording of the livestream he shows.
she was just on an audio call.

>>510315524
agree kids should make that decision instead since they know best

>>510313617
Thays not what I saw. Not even a little bit.
Whatever you saw and heard I dont know.
But what I saw wasn't that.

>>510315398
>demonizes
>oy vey! I need my advertising shekels!
C O O K E D

>>510314955
Every e-celeb has botted followers/engagement
sponsors know this, that's why they only get retarded shit like ads for mobile games or fake therapy

>>510315127
That is a different clip from a previous conversation with that guy and even in that clip the father is implying it’s his decision to pimp out his kid. He can’t make that decision because children can not consent nor can a parent consent to that. It would be sec trafficking a minor if they made such a decision. But the situation where dean chimped and called for their investigation was because they had just said that CP was art and that it would be ok to pimp out their kids if they made that decision.

>>510315459
it's a 4 minute video, just go watch it.
The brooke shields clip is at 2:30

>>510315127
No point in talking to that retard anon he only watches 30 seconds clips with five bazillion things going on at once to provide stimuli to his smooth brain and are purposely taken out of context because he has the attention span of a gnat and is disingenuous.

>>510315689
>You can literally hear her talking to dean in the recording of the livestream he shows.
Yes, you can hear her response to Dean's response to her initial comment.

The initial comment, and Dean's initial response was not presented in the video.

That's literally cherrypicking.

>>510315822
>implying it’s his decision to pimp out his kid.
No he's not.

>>510315822
>But the situation where dean chimped and called for their investigation was because they had just said that CP was art and that it would be ok to pimp out their kids if they made that decision.
Yeah they literally call CP art.

>>510315822
>>510315905
also dean gets the age of brook shields wrong. She was actually 11 years old, not 15, when being photographed naked. Making it even worse than he said.

>>510315952
u r ugly if 11 year old gals don't wanna bone u

5th grade tru college girls tried to get into my pants, better luck next life pal

>>510315824
>The brooke shields clip is at 2:30
>2:40 and now someone on the call brings up Brooke Shields
Again, no context how or what. It's a pointless accusation without that context.

>>510312993
DESK CIGARETTE

nevermind, he was actually talking about a different photoshoot of brooke shields.
Not the one when she was 10-11

>>510316084
He's providing the context to the clip from the livestream at 2:30 but he plays the clip at that 2:40 point

>>510316197
>He's providing the context
No. He doesn't. He states without showing the footage.

>>510311499 (OP)
Lmao cps doesn’t take people’s kids. At least not anymore. A little girl in my town died in a dog cage from starvation and my buddy (their neighbor) called cps on her family like 75 times.

>>510315904
It clearly is the implication you dumb evil faggot
>>510315905
I don’t even particularly like dean Im a tankie I think he is far too much of a neo liberal for my liking but he was absolutely righteous in going after those sick bastards they should be investigated they are a danger to their kids and everyone else’s kids. It’s insane anyone could argue that he wasn’t in the right

>>510316287
The bit at 2:40 is from the livestream.

>>510316287
He asks the mother if she thinks its exploitation and she says that its art.

>>510316332
>It clearly is the implication
>IT'S THE IMPLICATION
No. Hence why people are calling Dean a faggot.

>>510316360
It's the mother's response to an undefined question to a subject also not shown how it came up in the debate.

Also what are Brooke Shield's photographs of?As judging by the lawsuit she did not expose her genitals or breasts, which would have made it a crime.

>>510316332
How retarded are you? He was saying “hey if I was there and I let another grown ass man in with my kid while they were changing that shit would have been on me not the kid since I am the adult and children cannot consent.”

>>510311499 (OP)
Built for the BBC

>>510316405
>He asks the mother if she thinks its exploitation
No, it cuts straight to the mother with no context on the question or how Brooke Shield's came into the debate.

>>510316527
it starts with her asking him a question

>>510316621
she says its art later on

>>510316656
>it starts with her asking him a question
No it doesn't. It cuts straight to her answer.
>Also what are Brooke Shield's photographs of? As judging by the lawsuit she did not expose her genitals or breasts, which would have made it a crime.

>>510316684
>she says its art later on
With no context about it.
>Also what are Brooke Shield's photographs of? As judging by the lawsuit she did not expose her genitals or breasts, which would have made it a crime.

I think i found the full clip
https://x.com/itsdeaann/status/1942712305982062616

>>510316408
Well you are just a dishonest retard that most likely wants to rape kids all right wingers do it would seem. How else could anyone explain that you think it’s ok for a parent to make the decision on whether or not their child can be molested? Clearly you are a danger to children too. I hope you get investigated before you victimize a child
>>510316578
Incorrect he said it was his decision to make and the wife said that CP was art hence the correct decision to report them to the authorities

>>510317027
>Well you are just a dishonest retard
You are, very clearly.

>>510317027
>Incorrect he said it was his decision to make and the wife said that CP was art
There was a lawsuit about it in the 80's, it's not CP.

>>510317198
If CP was legal, does that make it moral?
The answer is no.

>>510317027
You Lost
Cope. Seethe. Rope.

>>510317314
>If CP was legal
> the wife said that CP was art
Well you are just a dishonest retard.

>>510316958
Why are cuckservatives trying to defend Trump perving on teenage girls in a changeroom? Is this the hill they want to die on?

>Americans will have a moral panic over this album cover and claim the the parents need to be doxed and arrested

>>510317027
this video has more of the conversation, but not the entire thing
>>510316958
>https://x.com/itsdeaann/status/1942712305982062616

i dunno where the full livestream is

>>510311499 (OP)
>IT WAS AN AXIETY PEN
https://youtube.com/shorts/dLqn4WEzzhM?si=7zsg4r_CwPSc7e7Z

>>510314085
Nobody sane wants to be associated with Democrats

>>510317198
>a jewish judge said it was ok goy
>>510317332
I except your concession

>>510316958
This is bizarre. Americans will literally defend anything as long as their chosen politician does it.
>B-but putting a 12-year-old on a billboard with her hands covering her tits wasn't illegal, so who cares?!
People who think legality = morality are brainlet faggots.

>>510317198
>There was a lawsuit about it in the 80's, it's not CP.
CP isnt defined the same in all jurisdictions.
Do you just define it by whats legal in one country, or by the actual content?

>>510317536
>a jewish judge said it was ok
>Judge Simons (Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jones and Wachtler concur)

>>510311499 (OP)
SWAT him clearly

>>510317515
>Nobody sane wants to be associated with Democrats
Nobody sane wants to be associated with politics at all.
They would much rather sell snake oil.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Rzr3AOtFA8o&

>>510317619
>or by the actual content?
By actual content. And CP is defined federally in the US.

It did not meet the standards to be considered CP.

>>510317648
>simons
I rest my case chat miggers are all pedos that defend the abuse of children on behalf of their jewish overlords

>>510317619
>>510317648

>>510311743
Bro not cool don't even start with that

>>510311499 (OP)
zoomers love to scandalize everything, including the rights of parents
they have no idea what being a parent is like, so they have no problems casually throwing around accusations of pedophilia and child abuse because they have no concept for the weight and gravity of these accusations, they think its all fun and games

>>510317382
uh, based cuckservatives?

>>510317846
>I rest my case
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_D._Simons
He's wasn't a Jew.

>>510311499 (OP)
why do zoomers think we know who this is

What is with all these streamers being complete sociopaths desperately trying to ruin the actual lives of anyone who even slightly disagrees with them?

>>510317981
This.
They just try and destroy whatever is in their collective social sights for that particular day.

This dude could careless about the rights of children in any situation. Hes just there to stir shit up for his viewers to get a feel of power from wielding a social isolationist hammer. He would do anything for more power and is just a cheap communist komasar for the gulag.

Theres little difference between what he does and what the Stalinists, or pol pot did.

>>510318191
Every single time

>>510315127
what the fuck is dean's hypothetical even trying to ask
>do you think you have the right to let a 65 year old man look at your kid naked

what is that even saying? how is this 65 year old man looking at the kid? are they on a beach and the kid takes off his swim trunks or something? what are you supposed to do, go over and rip out the guys eyes? what even is this hypothetical

>>510318326
nephilim possession

>>510318510
most "english' names derive from hebrew names. were do these mouth breathers come from?

>>510318546
In a changing room in private

>>510319011
before i express my opinion on the matter, if i express a position contrary to the zoomer consensus - will i get publicly crucified by broccoli hair vape pen addicts?

>>510319574
you are on an anonymous forum.

>>510317589
>Americans will literally defend anything as long as their chosen politician does it.
based and cult of personality pilled

>>510311499 (OP)
Oh look, it's David Neutered!