>>510328764 (OP) well if you consider a "scandal" to be "not a scandal," then sure let me show you how it works >scandal = not a scandal >scandals = 0 however facts and logic don't care about your feelings, snowflake so I don't exactly see the point of this thread
>>510331002 Did that gif cause someone to hack "Elmo's" X account so that it would then be linked back to that very gif or at least mean that gif is then used in relation to the hacked account?