>Corporations should not be allowed to own single-family housing

why?

>>510367539
because I don't like it

>>510367539
Because kikes

>>510367539
Idk. Maybe they will use their profits to buy up real estate for cheap and subsidize their employees with them to justify paying them less? If they buy enough, no independent person will be able to afford them. If majority get owned by corps, they can monopolize it and price people out.

>>510367639
>monopolize it and price people out
that's not how capitalism works moshe

>>510367932
None of this subsidy-laden golden parachute bailout app-colluding bullshit is capitalism I at least want the bits that benefit my class of people.

>>510367539
Because when the answer to
>Would this policy hurt jews?
is yes, it's a universal indicator that it would be good for the nation.

>>510368888
>let's become communists to own the jews

>>510367330 (OP)
Corporations should be allowed to own single family housing for a set period before taxes spike to 100% of assessed value. That greases the gears for lenders to still be able to foreclose on people who don't pay back their loans, while preventing speculators from buying and holding to artificially drive up prices through forced scarcity
However, the length of time (6 months?) should not reset until a private individual owns the home for at least 2 years

>>510367330 (OP)
They're allowed, but if its vacant tresspassing laws dont apply and their not legally allowed to cut pff electricity water or sewage