>>510372682>This is why the phrase "silent majority" describes conservatives so well, because right wing politics does not demand this kind of theatrical exhibitionism.The silent majority describes those people who at least want to try to be decent, a decent person doesnt cause trouble. Compare this group to my input on the former group, "the silent majority" has things they actually believe in, not even that their beliefs necessarily agree with each others but they each have things that they believe in, whether correct or not, strongly enough that they dont deviate from them easily.
And, looking at them, while keeping in mind that to understand something we ought look for the constants, decent folk dont seek fame or fortune or power. These are all virtue but also leave the door wide open for shit eating trouble makers (kikes, leftists, rinos, etc) to attain those things. More importantly, whether or not these peoples beliefs are true things they are at least aligned with the truth. Propaganda and public circus acts do not spread the truth, we have a near infinite supply of examples showing that truth spread in those ways is always rejected while lies spread in those ways is always accepted.
This gets a little meta, propaganda and public circus acts are both inherently lies to begin with, they are vehicles for lies only. Propaganda, requiring funding to force it into the minds of people, from the outset is manipulation, a lie. And a public circus act, an exhibition of attention grabbing, is from the outset nothing more than that: theft of attention, a congame.
Truth does not mix with lies and it never will, when ever truth is spoken in the presence of a lie the truth of it seems to slink away as if incompatible, and why wouldnt it be?
my point here is that they, (((they))), can not speak the truth and if ever they do that truth vanishes, therefor all they can do, think and say is lies. What could we say of plans made out of lies?