Beats capitalism any day

It’s a Jewish scheme to attack White people. You can’t prove me wrong.

>>510373720 (OP)
National or international?

Rare flag

>>510373720 (OP)
its a set of ideas like religion, it sounds good on paper until humans i mean pigrats try to enforce it by force

>>510373720 (OP)
the elites know it will come inevitably they just call it "AI singularity" or something like this... post scarcity society

it's a good start

>>510373988
Privyet comrade.

>>510373720 (OP)
Freddy Mercury was a brown hatter

>>510374068
thats not freddy mercury but freddy mercury was cooler, but he was ultracapitalist considering his massive succes

>>510373775
fippity bippity

>>510373720 (OP)
I know that USA is more socialist than Nordics. Minimum wage = socialism.

>>510373720 (OP)
I think Socialism has some good ideas that can be incorporated like ensuring the well being of your countrymen through social programs. I don't think as a full blown system its great but a hybrid system with socialism and capitalism is a good idea.

>>510373810
How is it a jewish scheme to attack white people? What does socialism do to attack whites?

>>510373720 (OP)
Unless it is Nationalist in nature, it shall become jews taking wealth and property from Whites in order to distribute to niggers who do not work.

>>510374430
Minimum wage feels like jewy semantics so you can't say "well my wage is too low" because the industry leaders can say "well that's the minimum wage I can pay you so the government says it's enough".

>>510373720 (OP)
Judeo-Bolshevism was not socialism.

>>510373720 (OP)

Increasingly I have come to see it as a good thing. It needs to be Jew free and socialist nationalism (anti-Marxist) rather than international socislism (Marxist).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism_in_one_country

>>510374587
>How is it a jewish scheme to attack white people?
The whole “oppressor-oppressed” dynamic that is fundamental to the arguments of socialism have been weaponized against whites in the current age. “White privilege” would not be a phrase but for socialism. This is undeniable.
>What does socialism do to attack whites?
It gives violent retards an excuse to attack people for their perceived ideological slights.

>>510374706
It also stifles unions, since the main objective of unions is to collectively negotiate wages. This is how it is in the Nordics. Large scale union membership who negotiate the wages.
With minimum wage, the government takes that upon itself, leading to lessened need for unions.
Unions = capitalism (freedom of association)
Minimum wage = Socialism (wage controls/government control of the economy)

>>510373720 (OP)
It's largely misunderstood.
Critics of socialism have convinced the masses that socialism is a prescriptive position instead of a descriptive one. They try to convince people that being a socialist means supporting government solutions to every problem when that could not be further from the truth.
The truth is that the issues which face society are complex and require nuanced solutions drawing from a number of approaches, some of which are going to be state-based and some of which require the continuation of the market and private ownership of production.
What the socialist realizes is the nature of the society we find ourselves in. It is owned by wealthy individuals who operate both it as well as the economy in their favor. What the socialist desires is a system and economy which operates in favor of the common people. Sometimes that necessitates direct control by a government that is controlled by the people and which works in their favor. In other instances, it means allowing private businesses to fill the gap, regulated in such a manner where the monied class cannot claw back control over society.
Ideally, it is driven by the working classes. Not by elites acting in their name, but directly by representatives chosen by those working classes.
It's not a perfect system because it's not a system to begin with but rather a question of who governs society itself. And yes, implementations have always been flawed. But the socialist will point out that the wealthy class operates in *exactly* the same way when it has power, the primary difference being that it does so to its own benefit at the expense of the lower classes.

>>510375709
this.