Anonymous
ID: bkjUnXkc
7/15/2025, 12:52:01 AM No.510399526
>NOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST SURVEY ME!!! MUH PRIVACY!!!
Privacy to do what?
Privacy to do what?
Replies:
Thread 510399526 - /pol/ [Archived: 410 hours ago]
Anonymous
ID: 9q1Sspql
7/15/2025, 1:08:57 AM No.510400739
Who are you quoting?
Replies:
Anonymous
ID: Bp3AYx90
7/15/2025, 1:10:54 AM No.510400879
>>510400739
He's taking a break anon. Gobbling Palantyr military industrial cock can make a guy go crazy after all.
He's taking a break anon. Gobbling Palantyr military industrial cock can make a guy go crazy after all.
Anonymous
ID: 0PYqhcgA
7/15/2025, 1:13:43 AM No.510401073
>>510399526 (OP)
This is something that anarcho capitalists, and libertarians refuse to recognize. Let's just take the internet for example. What if all infrastructure was built by one company. That company, right now, would be absolute dictator. If it decided you couldn't have internet access unless you got triple vaxxed, you'd have to get triple vaxxed or be unemployable and homeless. The idea that competition solves this problem is absurd. When a technology is invented, and unregulated company can corner the market completely by owning the infrastructure built around it.
>Why can't another company build another infrastructure
Because of all the deals the monopoly company made with the companies that own the roads. And how you wouldn't be able to use the roads unless you signed off on exclusively letting that company handle internet infrastructure
Etc.
It's like at work how you're forced to sign an arbitration agreement. It's like that dynamic only on absolutely everything in life.
This is something that anarcho capitalists, and libertarians refuse to recognize. Let's just take the internet for example. What if all infrastructure was built by one company. That company, right now, would be absolute dictator. If it decided you couldn't have internet access unless you got triple vaxxed, you'd have to get triple vaxxed or be unemployable and homeless. The idea that competition solves this problem is absurd. When a technology is invented, and unregulated company can corner the market completely by owning the infrastructure built around it.
>Why can't another company build another infrastructure
Because of all the deals the monopoly company made with the companies that own the roads. And how you wouldn't be able to use the roads unless you signed off on exclusively letting that company handle internet infrastructure
Etc.
It's like at work how you're forced to sign an arbitration agreement. It's like that dynamic only on absolutely everything in life.