Why should I prioritize my ancestors pre ~600 AD over my ancestors post 600 AD? This is so stupid and backwards. They were savage tribesmen living in the woods and their history is much less interesting than their descendants who actually did important stuff and had a civilization. And sure "most" of my ancestors would've been pagan but so would "most" of my ancestors have been proto-white/non-white archaic hominids who lacked religion altogether. Anyway I love reading about Medieval and Early Modern times... SORRY NOT SORRY HAHAHAHAHAHA!

religion is basically just the collective wisdom of your ancestors. But when you worship a jew you are not worshiping your own ancestors, but theirs. You become a branch on their tree.

>>510403948 (OP)
Because if you are aware of the Jewish problem you should stop worshipping a Jew. It's that simple. You don't necessarily have to be a pagan but c'mon now, a literal rabbi who preached racial equality?

>>510404108
My ancestors post ~600 AD are more important than those pre ~600 AD and wouldn't this make them le evil Jew worshipers thougheverbeit.
>>510404192
This post is specifically about Neopaganism. I don't care much about contemporary religion but I am interested in Medieval and Early Modern religion.

>>510404254
The bible is filled with stories aobut jews raping and murdering their enemies, jewish supremacy, jewish triumphalism, jews being the most important thing in th world.
Seeking a jewfree world means getting rid of the bible, necessarily