if it's all just a simulation?

>>510410545 (OP)
I don't think anyone really questions if it is real. The question is...

1) Has it been overblown by nutjobs on the rights.

2) What is the list exactly. Even if you say Client list that is vague. It could be a mix of people getting different service. Not all of the services might have involved young girls. Some might've been over 18. Some might've been professionals. Some might have been other services that had nothing to do with sex.

When Trump says the list could take innocent people down he is not completely wrong. The problem is his side hyped this shit up and now they're paying the price.

And the public is so dug in on both sides of the political spectrum there isn't anyone both sides would Trust to sift through the list and try to redact those who likely weren't seeking young girls. This is an example of Trump's style of politics hurting him.

There is more nuance to releasing this list than some might want to admit but the problem is MAGA isn't a nuance movement and it never has been. Nuance also has a tendency to feed conspiracy theories.

>>510410545 (OP)
a simulation of what

>>510410545 (OP)
It's old news, bud. Time to get over it.