Why does everybody hate him so much?

-destroyed the entire western world
-lied the US into war
-cracked down on freedom of speech
-passed income tax
-created the federal reserve
-put the entire war economy into the hands of three jews

There's nothing to like about him aside from the racism.

Federal Reserve, Income Tax, WWI, 19th Amendment

He's jewish

>>510410935 (OP)
he stroked out and let his wife run the country for a few months

>>510411141
No, he just wished he was jewish and did whatever they told him to do.

>>510411053
His wife did all that

He was the first president to get his legs smashed by the yids behind closed doors. He kept us out till 1917 when you had retards like Teddy talking shit as soon as 1914 that we should get involved

>>510411053

>destroyed the entire western world

How? By entering the war or negotiating the peace? He was actually moderate and reasonable compared to what the frogs and bongs were demanding.

>lied the US into war

Teddy was actually much more bellicose and Hughes would have probably been the same.

>cracked down on freedom of speech

Mainly against commies

>passed income tax
>created the federal reserve
>put the entire war economy into the hands of three jews

Fair on the rest, but every ensuing president should be equally scorned for not repealing any of that.

>>510411391
>his wife

Nah that was just the last year, most of his term he was copus mentis and in full control of his own terrible decision making.

>He kept us out till 1917 when you had retards like

It's possible someone threatened him as the quote in pic related would imply, however the fact is once he entered the war he went full steam ahead pushing all the pro-Brit propaganda he could, outlawing German communities, locking up any dissent, handing over the economy to jews, etc.

Also his reasoning for getting into teh war was retarded, he specifically cfited the "freedom of the seas" yet it was Britain that was blockading German ports and Wilson who never pushed the issue by demanding US ships be allowed trhough the blockade. Had he done that in 1914 British ships would have fired on American vessels necessitating the US siding with Germany. America therefore was never neutral, it had been abiding by the British blockade and funding the allies since day 1.

We Poles like him a lot for the Thirteen Points & the Wilsonian concept of ethnic self-determination of borders

>>510410935 (OP)
>Why does everybody hate him so much?
It's leftist mobs hating him for being a race realist.

>>510411932
>How? By entering the war or negotiating the peace?

Yes, both. By entering the war he saved Britain and France's war efforts, destroying Germany, ensuring the rise of Bolshevism, the creation of Israel, etc. It was the greatest geopolitical blunder of all time from the perspective of a right wing American.
>actually moderate and reasonable compared to what the frogs and bongs were demanding.
The British and American demands were basically the same, they wanted to keep Germany somewhat down but otherwise didn't want it partitioned because they needed a counterbalance to France and Russia.

France wanted Germany partitioned so it could never oppose France again. That was actually the more sane view than just humiliating Germany slightly and bogging it down with debt, which only served to piss the Germans off enough to fight another war. Wilson's plans were moronic even at the time.
>Teddy was actually much more bellicose and Hughes would have probably been the same.


That's not really the point. While TR would have led the US into war in 1914 at least that might have meant a quick defeat of Germany and the prevention of the rise of Russia(and Israel). Wilson acted at the precise moment that aided Bolshevism and Zionism.

>Mainly against commies

No it was against all Americans, anyone left or right who opposed the war could be thrown in jail. You probably don't know this but the right wing position going back to the revolution was anti-war the founders didn't even want a standing army.

>, but every ensuing president should be equally scorned for not repealing any of that.

It's much harder to repeal something like this due to pure political inertia especially something as comprehensive and ell encompassing as the IRS or Federal Reserve system. No one today would even know where to begin.