Have you considered that inadequate support for Donald Trump isn't always from leftist shills?
That there are natives of this site, White nationalists, etc, who don't subscribe to any political party?
Has it crossed your mind?

>>510411910 (OP)
yeah but then you argue like shills (deflection and fallacy) and you have the same jpeg folder as shills and even if you didn't out yourselves in dozens of ways the right doesn't fracture and purity spiral like the left so good luck fellow organic poster

>>510412229
So you're just not going to put ANY (any) pressure on the president to advance the interests of the right?
That's gonna go over well.

>>510412229
Here is my voter receipt, migger

>>510412388
nothing like what I said, just a strawman
you outed yourself
>>510412625
>migger
no argument
you outed yourself again

>>510412229
>proceeds to project what he's doing with this post like the little jew worshipper he is

>>510412832
you are either stupid or lying
there was no strawman in my post
there was a strawman in this post: >>510412388
like OP, you out yourself immediately. pretending to argue in good faith for even a few posts is beyond you.

>>510412767
>>510413062
What strawman? I presented my observation that if you're not going to exert pressure on the president, it will fuck over the right and any slimmer of possibility for a WN state.
>>510412767
Yes blindly worshipping a pro-israel politician makes you a migger. I voted for Trump, and would vote for him again now because there is no other option. This breaks your mind, doesn't it?

>>510413241
>What strawman?
I never advocated "not putting ANY (any) pressure on the president to advance the interests of the right"
it's so over the top (ANY pressure, expanded to ALL interests of the right) that you cannot deny it being strawman - an argument that I did not make, which you're attacking instead of my actual argument, to wit: you will, and now have, outed yourself as a dishonest TDS shill instead of someone looking for a good faith discussion.
I will believe there are good faith posters ITT when I see them. they do exist. but you have proven you are not one by using fallacies and baldly denying it. an earnest poster would recognize the fallacy and attempt to address my point anew. you did not and will not.

>>510411910 (OP)
The guy is a fucking shillma nd everyone is riding his dick

>>510411910 (OP)
you sound brown

>>510413871
This thread is in address to deranged miggers who side with Trump on literally every issue, no matter how wrong it is. I apologize if that does not describe you, but the result of this behaviour is that literally no pressure will be exerted on the president. This is a serious issue, but we seem to be in agreement.

>>510414203
>motte and bailey fallacy "I really just mean (broader less objectionable thing)"
>deranged miggers
you out yourself

>>510412625
>18 years old
>mail in voter
>saying “migger” unironically
Brownoid detected

>>510414384
Fine, explain to me, in your own words, what Donald Trump has done so far that should give me trust that he will carry out his running promises.
>you out yourself
Yeah man those ActBlue shills are really known for calling people derivations of NIGGER online.

>>510414541
>Hating Israel is just so brown coded, man.
Kill yourself

>>510414541
That's not a mail in vote receipt either.

>>510414580
>Fine, explain to me, in your own words, what Donald Trump has done so far that should give me trust that he will carry out his running promises.
no, I'm not engaging in gish gallop by proxy. I addressed your OP topic and this is merely a deflection from contending with my answer, which you've yet to do.
>Yeah man those ActBlue shills are really known for calling people derivations of NIGGER online.
yes, newfaggot
>>510414793
>coded
you out yourself

>>510411910 (OP)
They genuinely cannot comprehend the idea that not everyone is part of their cult.

>>510415021
Your answer involved a sweeping generalization that we argue in bad faith. I have not seen this, but I have seen dozens of instances where any form of disagreement or deviation from the president's will immediately grants you the status of shill. I can crosslink a dozen examples of these posts on /pol/ right now.
Once again, the premise of this thread was to remind you that not everybody disagreeing with Trump is a shill. Do you understand as much?

>>510411910 (OP)
>"...when we're having some of the greatest success*"

*keeping this story suppressed

>>510415346
>Your answer involved a sweeping generalization that we argue in bad faith
and you proceeded to prove me right with a strawman, then a silly denial of said strawman, then a motte and bailey fallacy, all peppered with meaningless ad homs. then you deflected with an attempt at gish gallop by proxy which would have permanently shifted the focus away from the topic of YOUR thread, because eliciting a consice and logical answer to your topic like I gave you wasn't part of your plan.
you proved me right, shill.

>>510415715
I apologize for my fallacies. Will you respond to my argument now?

>>510415825
this one?
>not everybody disagreeing with Trump is a shill
as I already said: I believe earnest detractors exist but none are currently ITT
honest trump critics who don't have a shareblue jpeg folder in their back pocket are rarer than black swans

>>510414793
>[x] coded
That’s jewish terminology that popped up in the past month

Epstein is innocent since he wasn’t really charged

Plus kid pussy feels super good

>>510416581
I am mocking you. Are you illiterate?
It's your turn to prove you're White, by the way.

>>510416742
he's right, I already called you out for this. your toothless attempt at D&C and consensus cracking (didn't anyone teach you not to mix the two?) seals the deal.
>never interrupt your enemy when he's making a mistake. except shills because they always double down kek
>t. napoleon bonaparte

>>510416530
Then why are you lot so eager to call anybody presenting an honest detraction (examples: Why did Trump 360 on the 'p files? Why is Trump cooperating with illegals on farms? Etc) a shill? You tend to completely shut down and avoid further discussion.
I wish there was a way to make it clear that you are of the opinion that voting for Trump is the only option, but it's still a pretty shitty one.

>>510411910 (OP)
Or just go to Gab or any Dissident Right website with a comments section where you're see swaths of white nationalists criticizing Trump for betraying his base. But we're supposed to believe that's all shills?

>>510416872
What fucking divide and conquer? I would agree with you if it was about one of those "vote for Kamala" accelerationist brainlets, but there is no conquering here. Trump remains the only option and that's why we have to put MORE pressure on him to fulfill his promises.

>>510417052
This, and Trump literally getting ratio'd on his own fucking platform yesterday. It's utterly insane that people genuinely hold the belief that you are a shill unless you support Trump.

>>510417049
that's so extremely rare as to not be worth considering what I'd do.
instead, I engage with bad-faith shills day in and day out.
the latter so vastly outnumber the former as to make you premise absurd. you can't know how I react to good faith detractions because they virtually don't exist.
separately, you are trying to trick me into thinking I don't engage with detractors (whether good or bad faith). I happen to know I do. people who are engaging earnestly don't throw out these gaslighting claims about anon's own behavior know only to anon like you just did.

>>510417123
>What fucking divide and conquer?
"prove you're white"
>I would agree with you if it was about one of those "vote for Kamala" accelerationist brainlets, but there is no conquering here.
fair enough
>Trump remains the only option and that's why we have to put MORE pressure on him to fulfill his promises.
sure
when I engage with this, though, I have seen hundreds of shill reactions and exactly zero attempts at engagement.
do you care that bondi has prioritized child exploration networks and achieved significant victories in arresting and prosecuting them? the last AG Merrick Garland spent all his time prosecuting white protesters and calling them terrorists

>>510418167
The fact that you're even writing text instead of "You lost tranny" alone differentiates you from most /ptg/ bots. I retract my accusation calling you a migger.
I think you should reconsider who you deem to be a shill or not. Trump's approval is polled to be pretty fucking low right now in general and yesterday's ratio confirms this.

>>510417185
it's not "utterly insane"
it's quite reasonable
apologizing doesn't change the fact that you led with fallacies and insults and repeatedly outed yourself as an outsider.
>pic
hey look, you had the actblue jpeg folder ready to go just like I predicted

>>510418369
if I cared about the zeitgeist on truth social I'd be on truth social. platforms with usernames and post rating mechanisms are useless for producing truth anyway.
attacking muh ratio, "bots", and low polling are alinski tactics, not good faith objections to specific policy matters. you keep doing exactly what I said you would do, that's why I will stick with belief that honest trump detractors on 4chan are rarer than black swans. the problem is you're only pretending to share my values, so your values based arguments (when you bother to make them) lack verisimilitude.

>>510418329
He accused me of being brown. I responded accordingly.
>do you care that bondi has prioritized child exploration networks
Sure, that's wonderful. When people are criticizing her *now* though, they are referring to the obvious lying and coverup of the Epstein case.

For the record, I wasn't conscious in 2016, so I wouldn't know of anything from Trump's presidency. And yes, I am a newfag (2022).
>>510418459
>actblue jpeg folder
I saved this from a thread yesterday because it's funny as fuck. Calling it an actblue jpeg (whatever the hell that even means) doesn't change the reality that it brings to light.

>>510418656
Trump has a low approval rate right now in the midst of his lackluster deportation performance and coverup of the Epstein case. This is an inconvenient fact that you're going to have to reconcile with.
I also don't pretend to share your values, God knows what values Trump shills have other than supporting Trump. My philosophy revolves around the Fourteen words and advancing the interests of White nationalism. And yours?

>>510418689
>I responded accordingly
"no u" would be responding accordingly
you demanded a high effort performance that tends to derail the thread into discussions of paleness and follicle thickness instead of your OP topic: why are all trump detractors, even the ones who initially appear earnest, actually low effort fallacy-spewing actblue shills with the same meme folder?
>Sure, that's wonderful. When people are criticizing her *now* though, they are referring to the obvious lying and coverup of the Epstein case.
it is curious
but considering the success she's had combating child exploitation (when every previous administration acted like this was impossible) I'm willing to withhold judgment since I know this isn't the last we'll hear of it. obviously bondi aligns with our values so there are unknown unknowns at play and I'm more interested in figuring them out in time than making stupid assumptions that don't withstand scrutiny.

>>510418689
>I saved this from a thread yesterday
I don't care, you've got no credibility in my book after playing dumb about the most obvious strawman in the world. if you happen to be independently lone wolfing the same spammy, fallacy-heavy, circlejerking and deflection games as actblue without killing them for it then you're effectively the same to me.

>>510419017
>[my appeal to "like ratios" on the 80th most popular social network] is an inconvenient fact that you're going to have to reconcile with.
not really
most of my favorite policies are outside the overton window so I'm used to it
weren't you larping as right of trump? so getting "ratiod" (GO BACK) should be a basic requirement of unpopular but necessary policy.
>And yours?
burkean nationalist
break systems slowly if at all
if there's a political solution, it should come carefully

>>510419860
>without killing them
*joining them
my freudian slips aren't usually so violent lol

>>510411910 (OP)
I voted for trump in 2020. The first and last time I'll vote first party since 2008. The butthurt faggotmob of 2016 rocked but this nigga is fucking gay I literally wrote in Hitler in 2024. Come up and get me fedniggers

>>510411910 (OP)
can i just interrupt you for a second?

Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?
This guy's been talked about for years, Are people still talking about this guy?
This creep? That is unbelievable
I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this, when we're having some of the greatest success, and also tragedy with what happened in Texas.
It just seems like a desecration

>>510422631
So, you releasing those Epstein logs like you said you would?

>>510423661
Dont waste your time and energy on Jeffrey Epstein,somebody that nobody cares about. Democrats created the Epstein file