>>510459555This post is right. Whatever is supposedly happening to deteriorate living standards is nothing compared to the burden negrification puts on society.
You can not do anything without recourse to only caring about problems caused by niggers in the first place. No way to economically rely on more improvisational and trust based implementation of infrastructure or shelter for example, to actually feasibly tackle the housing prices/problem at large. These niggers rape and in any job market they practically steal, since diversity quotas are already subsidised stealing and incentive contra return inflation. (obviously counting arabs to niggers for the same reason en large)
If you could take a metro for an hour that is always on time or have some sort of dynamically booked carriage that helps you into the city with zero niggers present that also goes to your preferred location and you wouldn't have to live in a city, by necessity, but because it is a hub of culture, you also wouldn't have to have a job that requires your location if there was a way to actually distribute work based on requirement and merit in a natsoc country. The point being that cities by now are unlivable, and are so due to political falseness.
across all of the metrics of making work utilisable, negros completely shit the bed, even if one of a hundred negros doesn't in a single dimension of things they can do (imagine one of those supplements to manga literature where you have a polygon graph that shows skill distributions over shared traits. One in a hundred niggers might have a spike that is similar in some skill to an average successful white, in a white society, that also has discipline, but all across they are far worse off. If you want reform in your society it has to be free of cucks and negros and based on exchange of labor based on shared natsoc ideals.
Your opponent thinks that giving up property temporarily will do anything, and that is absolutely retarded.