>>510440183This is the support network issue. If you have no support network or a limited one, you are likely to be homeless for longer. Since people have much smaller friend groups nowadays, this problem has gotten much worse. It is better in rural areas because it's easier to get things done, and church groups are more likely to directly contribute massively to battling the problem. For instance, there are religious organizations that directly help with everything you just mentioned as a hurdle to overcoming homelessness. Some of which are statewide, and a few that operate in several states.
>>510441100It's not just a political problem. When we talk about homelessness, we are talking about several distinct issues that have different solutions, but we call all of them homelessness. The safety net issue is easy to deal with and doesn't have many hurdles to overcome. Permanent homelessness sucks up a lot of the funding for economic homelessness. Mental health, drug use homelessness sucks up even more. My understanding is that economic homelessness tends to get last dibs on resources in blue states and gets first dibs in red states. We can make getting the resources easier, but what tends to be the result is that the people who need it get last dibs on said resources, depending on the state in question. The federal answer to this is to make everything annoying, so regardless of who runs the state, the economically homeless person is more likely to receive the benefits.