China has been working tirelessly cleaning up their air pollution. It turns out that it’s actually making global warming worse. Science experts are now suggesting we need to pollute the air to save the planet. It’s the only way.
https://thehill.com/policy/equilibrium-sustainability/5400165-china-air-pollution-climate-change-global-warming-study/amp/

>>510472981 (OP)
On another note, should climatefags be publicly executed?

>>510472981 (OP)
I don't listen to faggot MSM on science, and neither should you. 99% of the time they're wrong or grossly misleading.
>MSM want to confuse and mislead you
I know, I know. It's a shock.

>>510473046
But just to be safe we should nuke Israel and gas the jews

>>510472981 (OP)
>pollution is causing global warming
>actually no chud pollution was slowing down global warming and cleaning the atmosphere would be anti semitic

>>510472981 (OP)
True. Sulphates dim the sun, reflect the sunlight.
Burn more coal.

>>510473046
Are you retarded or just acting retarded? Ozone is like 0.00006% and filters out almost 100% of UVC, most of UVB and about half of UVA

I can't wait for large scale carbon capture and being able to remove carbon from the air to start happening and it turns out that kills plant life.

>>510473673
lucky for you, the perpetual grift means nothing will ever happen other than siphoning more money from tax coffers

Just read this mf paper and it will make sense. Air pollution reduces radiative forcing (we've known this for a long time this isnt new science) by blacking incoming solar radiation. You wont be able to find anybody that thinks we should have more air pollution to fight climate change.

>>510472981 (OP)
>econiggers when they get what the fuck they want

>>510473962
what's the lunch special?

>>510472981 (OP)
as long as (((science))) keeps winning, I will be on its side!
bye losers

>>510472981 (OP)
an honest WTF to the power that be
what in the actual fuck do they want at this point?
i'll answer my own question pic related

>>510473318
CO2 is causing global warming, particle pollution like smog from coal is slowing it down because it seeds clouds and such. If you switch from dirty coal to higher efficiency coal or gas you still keep the co2 but you remove the particle pollution.

>>510474491
>.02 of the earths atmosphere is the key issue causing climate issues
lol. lmao even

>>510473046
if we double the nitrous oxide maybe we'll laugh more

Woah, what list are you talking about?
Epstein? Are you ok anon?

>>510473103
What else haven't you told us, dick? Leaving us out here in the dark

>>510473816
Does this mean everyone who bought carbon credits gets a refund?