A WEF bioethicist wants to genetically modify humans so they become allergic to meat.

https://x.com/thehealthb0t/status/1945116130546246077

>>510494471 (OP)
>IS THIS ETHICAL?
bro we have created some godless abominations that's for sure

>>510494471 (OP)
Hinhuism seems like an easier plan. A bunch of skinny fat short vegetable eaters

>>510494471 (OP)
If it's voluntary I guess so, but then you run into the same problem: if people don't want to give up eating meat, how are you going to convince them to modify themselves to be intolerant of it?

>>510494471 (OP)
there's a tick that does that. we need to unironically destrroy disease research labs aka cover them in concrete

>>510495474
>look anon at the end of the day we're just going to have to assume and apply full totalitarian powers to implement our idea of space communism or the planet will die, unlucky but the earth will be thankful

meat is poisonous already, humans should not consume flesh -- it greatly reduces the lifespan

going bald at 27 and having a heart attack at 54 is not "normal aging"

colorectal cancer, also not a normal part of aging

you're poisoning yourselves

>>510495508
I thought that was the original plan for Alpha Gal and Lyme disease.

>>510494471 (OP)
Fastest way to extinct the species.

>>510495242
The WEF is just comically evil at this point.

>>510495644
Exactly. It's only artificially modifying humans to be allergic to what they are comprised of. What could go wrong?

>>510496509
Don't feed the trolls.

>>510494471 (OP)
I'd like to biologically engineer him and make him allergic to cum. He'd go into anaphylaxis within hours of the procedure.

>>510495474
>voluntary
Heh, good one

>>510494471 (OP)
>bioethicist
people take this man seriously

>>510494471 (OP)
Humans are already allergic to 90% of plants. How would this benefit society?

>>510495644
Meat is the natural diet of humans. It is in no way "poisonous". It's literally required to live.
Almost all issues with meat consumption are actually just issues with sedentary lifestyles.

>>510494471 (OP)
Ethical? Depends on your ethical framework.

If you prioritize the individual liberty then it's not ethical.

If you prioritize the overall health of the planet and future generations, then it's ethical.

>>510499625
all the plant eaters I know are retards and retarded indians.

>>510494471 (OP)
globohomo has been around forever

>>510498887
>I'd like to biologically engineer him and make him allergic to cum. He'd go into anaphylaxis within hours of the procedure.
Lol, death by cum because you know he'd keep sucking cocks and eating loads anyway