>>510560463We, being the general conservative wing of US politics, are as many people point out, in a damned-if-you-do/damned-if-you-don't scenario. Trumps is not perfect, and has some horrible sides to him even, but he does get some things done that we need done, and he mainstreams conversations and idea that were politically unspeakable even a few years ago.
Does that mean his retardation and Jew-slavery get a pass? No, not for me at least, but we didn't have another option. What I would have liked to see is if he just kept his shit together long enough to build a dynasty so that other people with better self-control, better ideas, and stronger convictions could take over, but unfortunately he seems more likely to bring down his own legacy over stupid shit and result in setting us back in the end.
Because while next cycle, there will likely be a few Republicans vying to take over the throne from Trump, the question is by then will any of them want to tie themselves to him, or will they all be forced to run on "Ok, I'm for depurations and tariffs and stuff, but holy fuck I'm not him, please don't say I'm with that guy."