would kamala been better?

>>510599770 (OP)
there would be no difference.

>>510599770 (OP)
bit less fucking around with the market. more illegals and trannies. that's about it.

>>510599770 (OP)
There would be at least a 200% increase in trannies but a significant 300% decrease in child molestation

Depends on what you prefer I guess anon

>>510599807
at least the president would be hot.
>>510599886
illegals make OK street food and trannies make decent music so this just seems like win win to me.

>>510599770 (OP)
No, as bad as this is you absolute cannot give the reins to a woman, that would only invite true disaster.

>>510599807
everyone would be less retarded.

>>510599937
Did she promise to release the "list"?

>>510600047
I would try to rebuttal that but the I thought about Kamala Harris hitting menopause and launching the nukes and I can't stop chuckling.

>>510599770 (OP)
It would have been the same with different words. Stop falling for Red Team Blue Team

>>510599770 (OP)
Maybe, there would be more terrorist attacks from the far right screeching about how the election was rigged or something, but not much else would be different. Well I suppose the the American Steel buyout by Nippon Steel would not have gone through, but on the other hand wouldn't be these damn tariffs.

>>510599770 (OP)
>>510599807
Whoever releases the files is

>>510600198
I kinda do wonder what was in the files that nobody wants to release. I have three theories

>1. There was nothing in the files and trump was making shit up, and now he looks super guilty
>2. There was evidence showing he or his friends did some shady shit and now he's trying to downplay

>>510600198
IMVHO trump is a retarded faggot but he’s right in that there probably isn’t a list, but the fact he was winding up other gullible retarded faggots for years and is now trying to bail out of it is genuinely hilarious

>>510600047
oh yeah, because Trump's public fallout with Elon has shown us how much men control their emotions.

>>510599770 (OP)

We have one party. This is not a boomer meme. We have one party, and it is Jewish. There is no dichotomy. You were conned.

>>510599770 (OP)
of course, goy! just wait 3 years and you can set it all back on track!

Voted for Trump > Voted to give children mostly reversible, but sterilizing puberty blockers.

>>510600548
desu yeah,

Democrats worship Moloch
Republicans worship Ba'al

just depends which Babylonian god you like more.

>>510600198
No, for the dems it wasn't an issue. For them it was a criminal case that got shuttered because the guy it hinged on died. Not that they wouldn't have minded it being released, it just wasn't a thing for them. It became an issue for Trump because it was badgered on about in right wing circles, due to places like this.

>>510599770 (OP)
no.

>>510600671
I'm not a big fan of giving kids puberty blockers (especially without informing parents about effects, giving them willy nilly)

but just to play devil's advocate here. It's better if the kid get's blockers from a doc then from some discord guy who make it in his bathtub.

>>510600376
Number three??? Sir???

>>510600951
>It's better if the kid get's blockers from a doc then from some discord guy who make it in his bathtub.
Its better if kids don't get them at all. All you can do is put up deterrents. You are never going to be able to stop it 100%

>>510599807
border would be wide open still, no tariff schizo standoffs, and nobody would give a shit about the epstein list.

>>510599770 (OP)

>>510601270
>3. epstein built various androids to mimic politicians so he could get away with his crimes, Including Trump.

>>510601270
they got him

>>510601375
I get that, I've read the medical papers, they show some pretty bad side effects.

But atleast restrict them in away that's not an outright ban.

Make them check with a therapist.
Make them sign a bunch of waivers to scare them a bit.
Make them parents sign a bunch of waivers to scare them.

Outright bans never worked. They didn't work with beer, weed, coke, fent, and everything else the government outright banned (except CP, but most people find hurting children repugnent. and also it's a restriction on the distribution of porn)

The same thing will happen to these kids. They'll go looking for other sources, and god knows what they put those "pubery blockers" that they make online.

>>510599807
Sure there would. Epstein would have been swept under the rug and forgotten forever with only people who are regarded and dismissed as "obsessive conspiracy theorists" still giving a single fuck.

>>510601270
deliberate Streisand effect play gigacope