Why do feminists fear robot girlfriends so much?

>threat of female independence
If female independence relies on rejecting men then lmao.

i fucking hate robowaifu threads because i was born too early. god why do i have to be the last unlucky generation

>>510613083 (OP)
women have nothing on men except to lord their smelly holes over us and they'll die to keep it that way, just making sure only men do the fighting for it.

>>510613083 (OP)
None of this is real
Women are out and about and wondering wtf happened to you
They miss you
They might not marry you or associate with you, but I assure you, they want to see you doing well
Give them a landing path from their clouds of vain logic, to your fertile fields of intuition and creativity and romanticism

>>510613083 (OP)
they... literally don't at all. it's mostly clickbait engagement farming with a little bit of genuine pity/concern for men so far gone they think an ai bot is equivalent to a real woman (i am male). No woman legitimately fears being replaced by ai

>>510613083 (OP)
what in god's name is that headline.

>>510613083 (OP)
Deep down inside, beneath the many layers of girlboss lip gloss, they know the only thing they're good at is having pussies.

>>510613310
>they... literally don't at all

>>510613250
Femcel cope. I hear stories of spinsters seething and getting messages from married women trying to branch swing and I'm fucking glad they're unhappy. Women ruined the world. I've met a handful of of competent women and unlike how society should be, my father was never around because of work. Women can't train men. Let it burn.
>you just don't get pussy
I've turned down more pussy that 90% of the people on this board.

>>510613182
>he thinks robussy won't be banned and supressed harder than all drugs combined

Thread theme
https://youtu.be/9HAQWya3ynM

>>510613717
what to do then

>>510613922
Suffer

>>510613717
you're insane
female robot will be pushed, even endorsed by the state, you might even have tax cuts if you purchase one
it's the ultimate form of divide and conquer
for as long as they don't give you the ability to reproduce yourself, tptb will do everything to make sure you can have one that is cheap and does the job

>>510613083 (OP)
because women's whole approach to life is
>men will have to tolerate this because there is no alternative
so any alternative to them is threatening the basis or everything they did.
and since most of what they did is absolutely abhorrent to men, the alternative does not even have to be particularly sophisticated to be better than them.

>>510613250
>They miss you
I don't miss them.

>>510613083 (OP)
I don't think robot wives are the answer to the problem of the current state of women. It's running from a problem that can be fixed by reducing womens rights or changing the culture of how men treat women.
That being said, i find it really funny that it seems it may be easyer to create new, artificial, purpose fit life, than it is to deal with the shitshiw that is actual women.

>>510614341
>reducing womens rights
We don't even need this, we just need to take away their privileges and give a people a say in society to the degree they actually contribute to it. Feminism is pushed so hard in the First World precisely because women are the privileged ones and they don't want men catching on and "ruining the racket"

>>510614560
This. The situation as described by americans is far worse than my experience, yet our laws are not all that different. The culture is though.
Even within the country, the further you go from the capital city to any smaller city, town, village, the further you go from comfy, pointless women jobs like office jobs, the more decent women are.
And i don't think it's 100% womens fault either, if the men are too pathetic to set boundaries and rules for women, of course they will missbehave. Women are like children, they need guidance.
I was lucky enough to meet a good village girl at uni, and we fit together nicely enough. But i can't imagine this being a realistic scenario in america.

>>510614560
sadly, right now it is the exact opposite. those who still contribute get squeezed dry to a point where they have no time left to meaningfully contribute in shaping society, whereas the parasites who just endlessly siphon resources use all of their plentiful time to ensure that this status will not change but only get worse.

>>510614929
>Even within the country, the further you go from the capital city to any smaller city, town, village, the further you go from comfy, pointless women jobs like office jobs, the more decent women are.
100%. It could be forgivable if women eventually show the same enthusiasm in maintaining all the high tech that men invented, but since they clearly have no desire to do that as long as they can just leech off these men... well, that's not a sustainable social order, and in the long term women will suffer the most for it (intelligent feminists realise this, but as usual they only care about the damage it does to them, not men).

>>510613083 (OP)
Because women are easily beaten.

>>510613083 (OP)
Every monopoly fears competition

I don't fear robot girlfriends, I want one.

>>510613250
I'm disinclined to acquiesce your request.

>>510614107
This 100 percent.
Also these sexbots will only come in a gender-neutral one hole configuration, and the sexbot will lecture you about female empowerment and lgbt while you're fucking it.
(Read Pelevin, he described it all perfectly.)

>>510613567
His shit isn't just a flat out lie, it would still be pointless even if it were true.
Women are incredibly demanding. Unless they add physical intimacy to the deal, just hanging out with a male friend instead of a woman will always be the better option.
So his
>They might not marry you or associate with you
line makes the rest irrelevant, even if it were true.

>>510613083 (OP)
Because feminism isn't about equality it's about men bowing down before them and they use sex to do it.

>>510613083 (OP)
Not even a day since Musk released that anime AI waifu and female-intrasexual rage bait against AI is already infesting my mongolian-qatari underwater basket weaving forum

>>510613083 (OP)
Doesn't men having sex with robots make women even more independent than before?

>>510616949
Which just demonstrates that even they consider themselves to be good for sex only, otherwise they would just ignore this or laugh it off

>>510613083 (OP)
>posting 10 year old horseshit holewriiten smeg
KYS

>>510613083 (OP)
why is female independence a threat

>>510613083 (OP)
What do sex robots have to do with women?
Should men have a say over dildos and vibrators?

>>510613083 (OP)
Interesting. Female independence is entirely dependent on male dependency.

>>510613250
Women are incapable of thinking about anyone but "me'.

>>510617193
because sex robots would give them independence and they would have to take responsibility for their own actions

>>510613083 (OP)
They want men to do their bidding by using the only leverage they have. Feminism exists solely to make men miserable, and this post proves it.
Sexbots would reduce rape rates but they don't care about that as much as they want the men they hate forever required to pander to them to meet their sexual needs.

For the same reason they hate AI image generation. It removes the power and sway people (in general) have over each other since instead of putting up with some crazy artist or date, you can get your fantasies catered to by technology. It's just that men are more visually driven. If there was an AI Chad robot with a 10 inch hog that ejaculated chocolate and would go on hour long conversations catering to every woman's needs then I'm sure they'd like it just fine.

>>510617439
Seriously, sit a reader of vampire sex books down with an AI companion model that fills that role and I'm sure they wouldn't hate it. Human nature is transactional and this simply removes bargaining power from one side more than the other.

>>510613310
>ai bot is equivalent to a real woman
it's an upgrade

I don't get it where is the fairplay they are having acces at fucking machine dildos,
and vibrators and now they are scared and ban our equivalent

>>510618191
It's just sheer narcissism

>>510613539
some seething journalists don't represent reality

>>510617048
modern relations between the sexes are just too fucked.
in the past, the man had the last word, but he also had all the accountability. if shit went wrong, it was generally understood that this was his fault - he called the shot, his fuckup.
nowadays, women have the last word (or can force it if they really want to thanks to the backing of the state), but zero of the accountability. if she calls the shot and it backfires, the same authorities that enabled her to force her will will also just claim that it was your fault anyway, because you didn't stop her (even though they would have kneecapped you if you did).

that is bound to end in disaster. if you let someone make all the decisions under the full knowledge that they'll only ever reap the benefits, but will never be expected to shoulder the consequences, they'll start making decisions with short term benefits and atrocious long term costs because what the fuck do they care, not their problem anyway.

women know that the only thing that enables this status quo is their vagina and womb. if any alternative to them arises, they will pay dearly for the shit they did over the last century.

>>510618191
women fundamentally don't want a fair game, because they'd lose it.
that's why every single one of their demands is always about rigging the game in their favor

>>510618765
>women know that the only thing that enables this status quo is their vagina and womb.
Not even this necessarily, just their ability to trick men into supporting feminism (that's why so much feminist propaganda is pushed to men in particular, you can even see them discussing this openly on their internet communities because they're such shameless cunts)

>>510613083 (OP)
An enormous amount of this push for AI / robot gfs is driven by a very simple male desire that is going unsated en masse: for a nice woman to be kind and supportive towards him. The extremely adversarial posture that many women have taken up against men leads many (including myself) to despair. I really do get the feeling that many of them genuinely hate me simply for being a man who likes pretty girls.

>>510619583
They hate you for not living up to your expected gender role while having no intention of fulfilling theirs. They're parasites

>>510619583
Couldn't have said it better myself

>>510613146
rumao, hoes mad

>>510613083 (OP)
>Why do feminists fear robot girlfriends so much?
Because women and feminine men (incels etc.) are very impressionable and easily buy into hype and incoherent sci-fi fiction, so they think this is an actual thing.

>>510619583
>An enormous amount of this push for AI / robot gfs
This "push" is basically non-existent in society at large.

>>510613083 (OP)
They don’t, they just want everything you do to be illegal. Are you smart or dumb?

They use sex to extract resources from men.
Sexbots eliminate that avenue of extraction.

>>510613083 (OP)
How many dildos does this bitch own? Mind your own business Meghan.

>>510613083 (OP)
Good question. Here's another:
Why do they feel "female independence" is a threat to men?

>>510621611
oh you just wait mr town rapist this topic is gonna get exponentially more mainstream the more advanced AI gets

>>510622672
>this topic is gonna get exponentially more mainstream the more advanced AI gets
This will happen in precisely two more weeks. Meanwhile in reality, almost nobody wants this.

>>510613083 (OP)
>solution to the threat of female independence
Well they got that right

>>510622732
there's no such thing as female independence. that's why they see competition as such a threat, because at the end of the day, absolutely everything they have in life was provided for them by a man.

>>510623564
There is no such thing as male independence, this is why moids invest massive amounts of resources to create artificial females when they can't get a real one.