>>510629348I suppose it's a possibility. Can you concede that you may be wrong? This isn't religion, now. A negative answer can only mean that you personally have physical proof against the man. This isn't a 'ya just know' kind of instance, no matter how much you want it to be. We watched Biden creep on little girls in front of crowds for four years. Let's see the videos of Trump. I'm no superhero; I admit when I'm wrong. Can you admit that you're not thinking critically?