Fun Fact - /pol/ (#510644756) [Archived: 316 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: rgnLAiR0United States
7/17/2025, 7:30:12 PM No.510644756
IMG_9517
IMG_9517
md5: 0de7a661e18ab0fa78d871714861c0ea🔍
go ahead and google what the historical average IQ of african americans is.
Replies: >>510646255
Anonymous ID: ofv3kebRUnited States
7/17/2025, 7:42:37 PM No.510645524
Can confirm. My friend is Psychologist in a school district in CA. They don't test for IQ at all anymore. A certain group had too many kids testing as retarded. And so here we are .
Anonymous ID: At6vpO5VUnited States
7/17/2025, 7:52:47 PM No.510646255
1732459872719069
1732459872719069
md5: 4d2be3cbe7433c9235e1a8349c7266f3🔍
>>510644756 (OP)

Retired psychologist here.

Previous to that the de facto level was 95 IQ WAIS for mentally slow--the bottom 40% of population. Basically only suitable for light commercial/farm and preferably domestic work. In contrast self-made billionaires tend to have 1-in-million/in 100K top-range IQ's who can do complex calculus or linear algebra calculations in their heads. Keep that in mind the far-left starts ranting on inequality.

The 95 barrier is quite striking. IQ 96 can manage. A 93 has trouble tying shoes, reading clocks, and making 2-step logical conclusions (e.g. unable to spell a word or give an address that is stamped on the medical form they're asked to fill out).

Most American West Euro whites under 99 IQ have died off. You only see IQ problems with physical disorders, typically.

Yes, IQ tracks race, and the IQ tests since the early 1970's have been gimmicked to hide that for political reasons both in USA and elsewhere.

It's not different races so much as different species between an IQ of 150 and one of 90, let alone 70.
Replies: >>510648077
Anonymous ID: PVz+9WPhUnited Kingdom
7/17/2025, 8:17:39 PM No.510648077
>>510646255
>A 93 has trouble tying shoes, reading clocks, and making 2-step logical conclusions (e.g. unable to spell a word or give an address that is stamped on the medical form they're asked to fill out).
Really? At 93 IQ? That's crazy. I would have assumed that sort of thing was around the low 80s.
Replies: >>510648485
Anonymous ID: G4aIDCEHUnited States
7/17/2025, 8:22:59 PM No.510648485
>>510648077
yeah I don't buy it but its not important enough to worry about. poltards probably don't even understand iq so its unlikely that you'll get accurate information here.