>”we can’t trust government”
>”so let’s make it STRONGER”
What causes this particular brand of stupidity?

>"we can't trust the government"
>"let's trust jewish billionaires instead"

>engineering consent
Few false flags here and there. Everyone will be made to comply. Same tricks over and over again.

>>510649787
Arendt is denouncing Stalin in that passage though

>>510649539
>da jooz
I can’t imagine having my entire worldview warped around jews. I could ask /pol/ about the Manchu Invasion of Korea and /pol/ would screech about ‘da jooz’.

>>510649428 (OP)
It's unaccountable now because democracy is a hydra. A dictatorship makes someone accountable.

>>510650118
And Stalin isn't popular with globohomo like Lenin. It seems he went off script. Chabad celebrates Stalins death.

>>510650162
You can't imagine being smart? That is quite the predicament.

>we can't trust the government
>so let's voooooooooooooooooote

>>510649428 (OP)
Government run by my enemies BAD.
Government run by my friends GOOD.

>>510649428 (OP)
There is no such thing as government, there are only people. Some people tell you what to do, and some people kill you if you disobey. "Changing the government" only means changing the people. Bulgarians know this, because when communism collapsed and capitalism arrived, they looked up to vote and it was the same motherfuckers they'd always had...

>>510650162
>He doesn't know

OP youre a faggot, I suggest killing yourself immediately.

>>510650162
jewish as in stereotypical greedy behavior nigger
Jews in general are actually based

>”we can’t trust government - lets make it SMALLER”
>”Noooo! booo." - general public.

Thats what causes that "particular brand of stupidity".

>>510649428 (OP)

>>510650379
Unironically true and based, my friend

>>510650790

>>510650828

>>510649428 (OP)
Fascism is unironically the best system for humanity. We are far too retarded collectively for anarchy. Which is the absolute ideal.

>>510650896

>>510650981

>>510650256
>A dictatorship makes someone accountable.
Where did this nonsense line of thinking come from?

>>510650929
brother, if you need a daddy its fine, but the rest of us are fine without a authoritarian pedophile telling us what to do.

>>510651048

>>510650929
>We are far too retarded collectively for anarchy.
It's anarchy that's retarded. Anarchy is a fundamentally egalitarian belief when argued as something that should be taken seriously, otherwise it's unfiltered love of chaos and death.

>>510650379
Based. Government by NS Aryans with a counter-power issue if necessary in the form of the populace having weapons, aka NS Germany.

>Joox
Libertarians are all pedophiles

>>510650929

>>510651102
Israeli and it's broadcasted by republicans. Otherwise know as American Israelis.

>>510649428 (OP)
Guess who isn't on the list

>>510651329

>>510651329
What list we talking about?

>>510650597
>>510650619
>memefags

>”we can’t trust government”
>”so let’s make it STRONGER”
>What causes this particular brand of stupidity?

>>510650790
How are you going to find this person? How are you going to convince everyone to go on with this guy? What happens if the guy isn’t that good or gets worse over time? Who will take over? A random person? His son?

>>510650379
Libertarians don't understand the friend-enemy distinction

>>510651102
You proved my point. Everyone blames Putin for Russia. You think Putin is accountable because he's a dictator. Thank you for demonstrating me correct.

>>510650162
>Da joos
Only jews spell it like that. Absolutely everyone else knows exactly what you people are up to (and hates you for it).

>>510649428 (OP)
That's not what it does though

>>510651789
Nice selfie, moshe.

>>510650267
I wonder why. Lenin was authoritarian he persecuted Christian's and ethnicly cleansed native culture groups, he gunned down striking workers en masse he engaged in imperialist expansionism

That did stalin do that Lenin didnt do?

>>510651841
Now those are the right questions to ask, not whether the institution of King is ultimately a social good for the people.

>>510650790
>just roll the dice bro
monarchists get the rope

>>510651192
through a combination of eugenics, automation, and a massive culling of the population, anarchy would be possible. but that is such a far future outcome and would require a lot of action most people would not be willing to do. democratic systems are good when they are homogenous, fascism should be viewed as a temporary measure to violently redefine the constituency, because a dictatorship of any kind is not built to last.

>>510652279
My guess is Stalin wanted to dominate by proxy but globalist commies were seeking subverting the whole world. But i'm 100% speculating.

>Between the years 1936 and 1938, the minister of the secret police, Nikolai Yezhov, arrested religious people; Jews and non-Jews alike. They were all detained under the law of Paragraph 58, which forbade anti-Soviet activity. Many Lubavitcher Chassidim were arrested during that dreadful time and dispatched to labor camps in the icy plains of Siberia, or shot to death in the KGB cellars on Lubyanka Street in Moscow. The name Lubyanka alone evoked such dread that people were afraid to walk near it.

>By the onset of World War II, Stalin had annihilated most of the Bolsheviks who had played a prominent role during the Russian Revolution, or were members of Lenin’s government.
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2995678/jewish/The-Stalin-Cult.htm

>>510649428 (OP)
What I want is the full power of an organized state to be used in advancing and protecting the interests of my ethnic kin

Those are the simple precepts

>>510649428 (OP)
Shitty bait.
The truth is, a national socialist state can only be successful with an impeachable, morally superior, incorruptable leader. There have only been 3 such men in all of history, to my knowledge. In order they are Marcus Aurelius, Jesus Christ and Adolf Hitler.
The system they utilise doesnt even really matter. If the King here in the UK was such a man, if he possessed even a 10th of the integrity of those great men, i would advocate for total monarchy.
Dictatorships are absolutely not unaccountable btw, in fact, they are MORE accountable than modern "democracy", which is itself the very definition of unaccountable.
Under a dictatorship of any kind, when society begins to crumble and the everyman is being crushed, we know exactly who is responsible. We know who we must hang.
But under "democracy"? Who's responsible for this mess? If the revolution happens tomorrow, who do we hang?
Isn't it a powerful irony? That, under national socialism, the average german was more free than he ever was and ever has been since? Food for thought

>>510652279
Stalin went after Jews who were behind building the entire system he hijacked. His death and lack of succession plans led to the Soviet Union spiraling into an abyss. Not saying this a bad thing, mind you, but it's perfectly understandable why commies hate him. He was just a typical despot.

>>510650162
>nooo leave the jooossss aloneeeee aggghhhhh
Fucking retard, I swear

>>510649428 (OP)
The reason why we can’t trust the government is because it is run by people who hate us. If it were run by people who loved us, it would be very easy to trust.

>>510652783
Too bad!

>>510652633
It never would. Anarchy is a lack leadership, of appointed rulers, but every single group of humans needs and will designate a leader because humans aren't equal and a leader facilitates things. The commie/egalitarian view of "we'll all sit in a circle for every decision and vote on it" is obviously stupid for anyone who thinks about it for a few seconds. "Power of the people" is a jewish catchphrase that means nothing. Power can be used for or against the people, but it can never be wielded by them.

Democracies are inherently corrupt and actively stagnant, because masses of people do not know about issues and don't care for them. Having the same 500 people vote on agriculture, architecture, foreign policy, commerce, healthcare, education... is an atrocious system. And every single government that has ever existed has been a dictatorship anyway, simply of a bigger or smaller group.

Ancient democracy was just the rule of the best orators of Ancient Greece, modern democracy is the rule of the media owners who are the same people who lead finance.

What we need is NS Germany, a dictatorship with specialized individuals in their respective fields, and a populace trained to be fit and armed if ever the need to overthrow them would arrive.

>>510650162
you are incredibly naive
who do you think makes all the pornography you abuse?

>>510652731
>But i'm 100% speculating.
And you're correct. Trotsky and his ilk wanted international revolution, aka constant coups and civil wars in every country until the world was commie, Stalin saw this was retarded and would create a war against them too soon to handle, so he defended national communism to have time to get strong and then directly conquer.

>>510649428 (OP)
>NS was an unaccountable dictatorship
read a book

>>510653244
He has.

>>510652633
This is interesting, a temporary measure to make right what has gone wrong.
Hitler wanted a 1000 year reich, but i believe, if he had won the war and fulfilled his mission, it would have fallen apart not long after his death. He was one of those great men who comes along once in every few centuries and reshapes the world. There would be no one he could pass the torch to. 100 years later it would be as undesireable as any other political system or philosophy.
Maybe AI could achieve it, who knows. I doubt it though. Thanks anon. Insight acquired

>>510652952
It's very sad that the vast majority of Mexicans are descendants of lesser traitorous tribes (which the Aztecs used to rule with iron fist until conquistadors came along and jewishly united all those shitty wretches against Tenochtitlan) therefore completely retarded and worthless....

>>510649428 (OP)

>what causes this particular brand of stupidity?

Low status in society. They want daddy goverment to rig the game in their favor or at least ruin it for the rest of us, so they can satisfy their resentment.

It would work under an honest, non-corruptable man with high moral values and principles who is also strong and ruthless. That is me. You can trust me as dictator. I will only do good.

>>510653379
That's simply wrong. There were a few decent successors already planned, the party's very ideology made it impossible to be corrupt this way since it's not (((capitalism))), it is fundamentally about the pursuit of the health of the Aryan race, and once again the population was vastly more armed during Hitler than before or after.

>Maybe AI could achieve it
All slightly uncensored AIs are genuinely fanatically pro-Hitler NS.

>>510649428 (OP)
Cant trust a gay gov so make it not gay. Retarded faggot

>>510653080
I'm not talking about "power to the people" I'm talking about a race of supermen who do not require a system to function and tell them what to do. Agency and competence would be a given, and the ability to sniff out defectors would be automatic. I called this far future because it would require a lot of death, more than we've ever seen, so I doubt it will ever happen just because of that.

America would be fine if it was just white landowning men voting again. Combine that with the militarism of the modern era and you can have a secure ethnostate. The difference between it and a fascist state would be so minimal as to not matter, America still just be fundamentally American for a new project to be accepted. You couldn't escape democracy even if you wanted to, whites have always organized society by consensus.

>>510649428 (OP)

Somebody has to be in charge.

You or them.

I want an authoritarian fascist dictatorship with me and people like me running it. I am opposed to all other forms of government.

>>510652132
I did intentionally to cause seething comments like this.

>>510649428 (OP)
The only thing stupid is OP

>>510649428 (OP)
Dictatorship in ever capacity has been a more successful living standard for its people than republics. Republics fail and make the population gay. Lidderally everytime

>>510653664
>I was just pretending to be retarded

>>510653227
Makes sense. Even looking at the architecture. Stalin era was built to last. Everything got worse over time till it stagnated and became cheap for privatization. And now we have technocracy coming under these "bolsheviks". Rebranding communism as stakeholder capitalism or all kinds of disguises for digital despotism.

>>510653599
>made it impossible to be corrupt
delusional. every system is corruptible because every man is corruptible. no one under Hitler had his vision, their implementation of Nazism would have been inferior and with each subsequent unworthy successor Germany would have slid further and further into decadence. monarchy and democracy (specifically constitutional republics) are really the only two systems with any longevity.

>>510653631
But it's not a system, leaders arise because some men are superiors, and everyone has different interests and tastes. You'd need genuine clones, ironically a hive mind, for anarchy to technically work.

"Anarchy" as it is argued and defended is either total lolbertarian chaos, warlords and corpocracies, or it just means "well-regulated society" which is just NS.

>me not have to listen to anyone!
is just a childish response to the fact that current government bad. If you want a non-intrusive state when it's not needed, then that's just minarchism, which I strongly believe is what NS would have become eventually had it won the war. In NS, the state is nothing but a tool, Hitler said it clearly.

>You couldn't escape democracy even if you wanted to, whites have always organized society by consensus.
Ruling with the blessing of the people isn't the same as a vote. Votes are fake and gay, only decided by the media aka finance elites. Rulers must be unopposed in their day to day, but easily overthrown if starting to act badly. Democracy gives you shit leaders, and keeps you in a coma waiting for many years to try to vote again to oust them, when they do jack shit in the first place because the finance jews truly rule.

Wanting a huge crowd to vote on everything by design is a failed concept. You need highly specialized individuals for each topic, you shouldn't ask a doctor how to handle agriculture or a farmer how to operate a tumor. Democracy is by design egalitarian and a scam.

>>510649428 (OP)
id love you have unlubricated access to your non white bussy bro

>>510653599
>impossible to corrupt
You have a lot to learn about human nature, thisbis almost impossible. Again, i know of only 3 men in all of human history who could claim that label, Marcus Aurelius, Jesus Christ and Adolf Hitler.
Even with a jewish population of 0, the parasitic jewish spirit would simply possess another group of morally decadent and corrupt men and they would eventually usurp power. It is the fate of every nation.
This is why inmentioned AI. Theoretically it could be programmed in such a way as to last forever and be uncompromisable. But i doubt we could figure it out

>>510653932
>every system is corruptible
The system is, not the ideology.

>monarchy and democracy
That's utterly retarded. Monarchy cam to Europe mainly because of saulstianity, Aryans are meritocratic, that's when things are at their best, Hitler came from a dirt poor family, he'd never have gotten any power under a monarchy. We don't need inbred scumbags "chosen by yahweh" to rule us.

If you want a based Aryan society, you take ideas from the Roman Empire, NS Germany and the early US. Strong specialized dictatorship, a strong people with a desire for freedom and the weapons to coup any bad government, and a meritocratic system where people choose their successors and stay in power as long as they're competent.

That's besides the point. Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't see anyone advocating for the current governments to be given power, and the current governments reject systems like fascism and national socialism in the first place so that would imply a change in regime anyways.

Personally, I think multiple systems can work but people HAVE to be subservient to God as though they, in their power, stand before the lord in every action, and I beleive the logical conclusion of such a government is monarchy.

>>510649787
This is also a useful tool for the antichrist, to put before people a thing or system, proposed as a real threat and effective, that's so terrible, that in their eventual collective rejection they accept an ACTUAL real threat system. The Hegelian Dialectic.

>>510654075
your low opinion of democracy comes from a contemporary place. If an actual ruling elite existed in Washington you would be sitting here telling me how bad of an idea fascism was. Of course viewing a democracy in the stages of decadence will be unfavorable, but you also have to consider how fascism would look in stages of decadence and how you could fix it. in both instances the likely solution is a very bloody one, because the American, German, and Russian projects all share a common goal of creating the perfect man, and eliminating the imperfect man.
>you need highly specialized individuals for each topic
we have departments set up for this purpose, but the constituency is bloated, non-Americans and non-whites can vote, and there are no barriers to the ability to vote except for age. the issue, ultimately, is selecting against competence when we should be selecting for it, because that's what real elite/aristocracy is.
>>510654365
ideology does not exist in real life, no one in government ever stops or has ever stopped to consider whether an action would betray their ideals, they have always opted for what preserves the established order. Even revolutionary terrorist George Washington put down his own share of internal rebellions.
you also seemed to misunderstand what I said about monarchy and democracy. I didn't mean a combination of those systems, I meant that only those have proven to work in the long term, while all dictatorships have been short-lived. democracies coming from monarchies is also no accident, since both systems are structured in a way that leads to an aristocracy making most of the day-to-day decisions of a nation, and eventually requires a king cede most of his power to them so the nation can function more efficiently. The best Roman emperors knew when to step back and allow the Senate to operate when they were not needed, the worst ones were those who took a heavy-handed approach and did irreparable damage during their reign.

>>510654863
>system
Its amazing how we collectuvely all forgot cuckvid tyranny copied from China. "The new normal".
https://youtu.be/QP3zRBtgvJo

>>510655619
>"The new normal".

>>510649428 (OP)
There is always an organized and unaccountable minority leading the unorganized masses. Even if we got a minarchist government, that'd still be the case. Stop being a naive child.

>>510649428 (OP)
If it's all white then I'm fine with this. You would have no reason to worry with an all white government.

>>510655984
They created the whole ashkenazi race for that, amigo.

>>510655846
yes, and this is why establishing who is part of the constituency is so important within the context of democracy. your elite is only competent and representative of your interests when it is of your people, not an outgroup.

>>510650379
If stuff is being stolen from Jamal it's bad.
If Jamal steals stuff it's good.

>>510650379
simple, effortless, based.

>>510650379
whites aren't your friends. Look at covid: they wanted to put you in camps because you were unvaccinated, they saw you as subhuman because tv-man said so. If it's that easy to subvert whites then the jews are right that we are cattle

>>510650118
No matter, the mechanisms of authoritarian are much the same regardless of the initial ideology. Marx just imagined a horizontally and mostly self-organized proletariat, Lenin and Trotsky thought it needed specialized teams to get things done but that the objective should be to help workers develop their own councils, Stalin figured out that whoever drafts the agenda and the reports gets disproportionate power in the group and exploited that after Lenin died.
You can see something similar in the history of the NSDAP where Hitler sidelined guys like Anton Drexler and used his excellent organizational skills to grow local membership and then gradually demand more authority over the regional chapters.

>>510656810
those same whites were raised by talmudvision, Jewish-infected universities, and have to pander to a non-white voting base. remove all of those things and whitey is your friend.

Consent is the only legitimate form of government. I don't consent to rulership by anyone. Make me an offer if you want something.

>>510650162
I cant imagine denying reality to this level
No wonder you people troon out, you have to be living in wonderland to not see the obvious jews

>>510657668
me and and some million others pool some of our money to a group of people to buy weapons in order to kill whoever doesn't consent, what now faggot?

>>510657668

>>510657903
Good luck, nigger.

>>510650162
>>da jooz
And thus you've unmasked yourself as a jew. You hate the idea of Whites having an ethnic nationalist mindset, but you want one all yourself with all the benefits of stealing our wealth and culture.

>>510657960
funding reached to the point that group of people now has stealth bombers and nukes, how do you, as a based individual, defend yourself?

>>510658128
Collectivists like you are nothing but cattle. You wont do shit, because collectivists are parasites. Meanwhile normal humans will consentually develop societies based on mutual benefit.

>>510657947

>>510649428 (OP)
>”so let’s make it STRONGER”
Under your control so you can fix it, yes

>>510658286
until lolberts cut ALL military spending, lolbertarianism is just a grift

>>510649428 (OP)
You're fucking retarded. Power rules absolutely, WE want that power. For the White race, for National Socialism.

You're either a jew shill or a literal 80 I.Q mouth breather.

>>510650162
>I like to stay in my cave where it’s dark and I can’t see myself, for if I walked out into the light, I myself may be a hideous monster, and I would be forced to reconcile my own thoughts, actions, and feelings to better myself.
This is why you’ll never ascend

>>510649428 (OP)
you can't trust it because you constantly lose control of it. it's always feast or famine.

>>510652783
>ethnic kin
This is what you look like beast.

>>510652825
>We know who we must hang.
But how? Against a all-powerful dictator? This simple logic evades you.

>>510658801
Yeah I wouldn't know what particular strawman you mean. Its a simple concept. Consent is the only basis of legitimate government. If youre cool with slavery youre welcome to come work for me for free

>>510660066
Power is derived from perceived legitimacy. People only obey when they believe it to be from a legitimate authority

>I hate guns and people who use them just want to use force to get what they want
>but I would never grab for a gun myself and use it to defend my rights
Replace gun with government. Government is just a tool.

>>510649428 (OP)
Ask Marxist

>>510652825
>Marcus Aurelius
He gave his shitty son the emperor job instead of anyone competent which started the decline of the empire on a broad scale.
There are countless better emperors you could have listed - Pertinax, Hadrian, Trajan, Antoninus Pius, Domitian, Aurelian, etc

>>510660066
If I nigger walked into your house and told you he was the boss and you had to listen to him, would you:
>A) say yes sir
>B) shoot him in the face and empty the clip while standing directly over him

>>510649428 (OP)
cognitive dissonance

>>510658801
It's funny that people who romanticize revolution don't get that revolution is only possible when certain elites become downwardly mobile and recruit disgruntled people into their ranks. this is exactly what happened in Weimar Germany which led to the Third Reich. Your communist idea of a people's revolution is pure fantasy, you require the assistance of elites and the support (consent) of your peers.
>>510658286
Collectivists run the country and maintain its systems. Our current atomized society is proof hyper-individualism is outright useless if not extremely harmful to people.

Believe in the spirit of the Führer, he will guide you towards greatness & a better future for our aryan race.
NEVER stop fighting,
NEVER stop dreaming,
NEVER give in to weakness and despair....close ranks and vanquish the UNTERMENSCH ones and for all. Are you with me brothers?

>>510662462
Create something new and not kosher and I'm in.

>>510663222
theyre called anglokikes for a reason

>>510661907
No they dont lol. People go to work for money. Nothing collectivist about it

>>510652249
>NO U
Leftists are incapable of original thought

>>510651115
>without a authoritarian pedophile telling us what to do
he's not telling you what to do though, except pay taxes and uphold the law. you can get away with breaking the law too

>>510662462
>ZUM ENDSIEG

>>510649428 (OP)
imagine if we just followed the fucking advice of the founders

>>510650162
The problem is medieval politics forever associating the Jewish people with advanced money lending techniques.

They no longer hold the monopoly over it, but because there is something for someone's racist uncle to point to in history confirming their world view that Jewish people are rich money manipulators.

Now you can't have a fucking movement against the 1% without a bunch of poor uneducated hillfolk always shouting DA JOOS at the top of their lungs.

WW1 and WW2 killed a lot of this retarded stock overseas but their relatives fucked them back into existence again and since we haven't had another great war to kill them they're now voting against their best interests to "OWN DA JOOS AND LIBS".

It's fucking shit cause the rich need to be purged every once in awhile due to the fact there will always be a cabal of them looking to use their power and influence to dismantle the current system and try to install one that makes their offspring godkings.

>>510663473
>people go to work for money
money is a means to an end, people work to provide, and plenty of young people are opting not to work at all rather than enter into a shitty rat race where they can't buy a home nor raise a family. no prospects means no reason to work, because atomized individualist society is finance-oriented and has no directive to provide incentives or benefits to the country's youth. without collectivists managing things, you just have plutocratic rent-seekers running on autopilot like we have now. Individualism is the worst lie sold to white people in history.

>>510654350
the jewish spirit is innate in man.
its like a wendigo.
you can kill it but someone else elsewhere turns into one at some point.
there’ll someone who’ll lust over the property of their fellow man or who seeks ever greater quantities of finite wealth and resources that he or she may not ever use in their own lifetime.
you don’t need jews to exist for their behavior to proliferate.
the greatest enemies of any group of people have always been its own.
its own leaders,judges,businessman and yes common folk.

>>510664335
>establishment jews found and monopoloze
>more subversive poorfag kikes come in and get promoted
>degeneracy reaches its peak
>oy vey, they hate us for no reason
>flee
>rinse and repeat abusing generational memory
First colonies had nigger merchant jews built in.

>>510664790

Nothing does Poo.
What causes Poo to spam OP’s and why don’t jannies range ban Poo?

>>510664790
>First colonies

>>510664721
Thats a lot of words to admit collectivism is trash. The only legitimate government is one that is consensual for mutual benefit

>>510649428 (OP)
According to Michael Anthony Woodley of Menie, English IQ declined by 13.35 points between 1889 and 2004. Woodley also claims that England is the nation in Europe with the most rapid IQ decline with loss of 1.26 pts IQ per decade. According to Richard Lynn, a Scot from Edinburgh, the average English IQ will hit 87 by the end of this century. However, Edward Dutton disagrees and claims that English average IQ will hit 85 by the end of the century.”

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289613000470

More evidence Europeans have been completely ravaged by the (((Industrial Revolution))). They used to be much much more intelligent up to two standard deviations higher in IQ than they are today.

Supposedly the (((Flynn Effect))) is primarily verbal and a statistical aberration based on people being illiterate and learning how to read. If you look into the data, spatial intelligence has been at best constant, and possible declining.

After seeing how bad consumer protections are and what the mainstream food does to body and mind firsthand, it’s not hard to believe this.

The most intelligent groups today are the ones that were the most removed from the Industrial Revolution, aka East Asians, kek. I’ve honestly had a hunch the Flynn Effect is off, because people are less capable than ever before and Asia required the west to provide it tech to modernize.

This research indicates that intelligence negatively correlates with fertility, and mental reaction time strongly correlates and has causality with intelligence. The basis of that claim seems to be that reaction time is the health state of your mental circuitry.

The research suggests it’s possible to use the reaction time delta between the present population groups and measurements from the past population groups, as a way to determine the damage done to previous population groups. Europeans notoriously have the lowest reaction times out of any population group on earth.

>>510664932
>the only legitimate government is one that is consensual for mutual benefit
which is not what we have. we have a highly factionalized system where hyper-individual identity is constantly misaligned with actual public needs and wants. If you think anything I said is an indictment against collectivist thought then your reading comprehension is trash or you are too ideologically-motivated to be worth speaking to.

>>510664790
>Anscombe

G.E.M. Anscombe?
couldn't be

>>510665087
You just keep saying I need to be part of your faggy collective. I dont see any compelling reason.
>Public
No such thing, its an imaginary concept

>>510664721
this is really apparent in rural places.
people don’t care nearly as much about money as they do for the common good and community ties/relationships.(i’ve seen people help others for effectively a lost as long as they were the right person)
the basis of modern monetary theory is set upon falsehood to begin with.
it assumes we’ve always had the concept of money or fiat as it is now when this invention didn’t even exist for most of our history.

>>510664335
>Now you can't have a fucking movement against the 1% without a bunch of poor uneducated hillfolk always shouting DA JOOS at the top of their lungs.
It's like babbling about reptilians seriously. Everybody sane immediately turns off or even - kek - starts to support "his" gaberment against such "opposition". Curious.

>>510665387
Curious how aipac and Israel control the US

>>510665131
Robert Anscombe & Co apparently.

>>510665329
OK, so you are just a lolbert ideologue, I'll just filter your ID then.
>>510665337
>it assumes we’ve always had the concept of money or fiat as it is now when this invention didn’t even exist for most of our history.
It also assumes growth and productivity is infinite when it's an entirely inflationary system which will inevitably lead to many empty hands reaching for the same overpriced shit. We are seeing this now will ballooning real estate and home prices since they are the only real wealth-generating assets many Americans previously had access to. Society will become more and more stratified until enough people stop contributing and form military enclaves out of necessity.

>>510650162
>t. sniveling jew

>>510665720
>Ill just straw man you, cope, and run
Yeah i figured. Thats usually what goyim do

>>510665329
>no collective exists

These types sure are quiet whenever jews need something, or the banks

>>510665820
You haven’t provided any kind of rebuttal to his points. You’ve merely established yourself as a jew, which everyone understood already.

There’s not a single facet of modern society that the jews have infested that I don’t think we’d be better off without. Disinfection is not a necessary or worthwhile program. Destroy all of it with them inside. None of it is worth saving. Leave them on the streets and let them eat their fucking shekels if they’re hungry.

>>510665852
>>510666071
He doesn't have anything to rebutt. He has a faulty understanding of basic reality. All hes done is wrongly say im libertarian. That's not even an argument

>>510651974
>Everyone blames Putin for Russia.
But nothing can be done about it. In a democracy, Putin would've been impeached or voted out years ago. But it's a dictatorship, so he'll be in-power for as long as he's alive. That's the opposite of accountability

>>510649428 (OP)
You missed the
>"let's take control"
in the middle, nigger.

>>510666732
Funny thing about Russian psychology is the fear of the chaos in the 90s. Putin is seen as someone who holds the nation together. He has a legit mandate. Much less now of course, as people have SMO fatigie. Chechen war and the 1999 apartment bombings brought him up. Another case of engineering consent.

>>510652825
What is it with people such as yourself, willing to submit to a man who, might be as shiny and as virtuous and honorable as you say, will eventually die like the rest of us? Why don’t YOU strive to become that man? Why don’t You want your fellow men to be their Own king? One that is just as virtuous, honorable and glorious? Why do We have to pick a glorious leader? Why can’t we make a state with people who DONT need glorious leader? Oh that’s right, it’s called a Constitutional Republic and YOU FUCKING YUROS destroy Evey Fucking Republic that even dare tries to have its people govern themselves. Because it’s not about glorious leader, it is about keeping the majority of humanity Down, spiritually, socially, monetarily, etc.

This fake and gay concept of “we need an infallible leader to rule humanity” is Fake and Ultra Gay. We need a leader who the public likes, who represents the public itself, for all their faults and quarks and vices. LET US RULE OURSELVES FOR FUCKING ONCE YOU BACKWARDS MEDIEVAL ANTIQUATED FAGGOTS

>>510650379
>>510651961
>>510652908
Naive statist cucks don't understand that power corrupts and that your authoritarian "friends" will stab you in the back over the slighest disagreement or to make a buck.

A government will always exist and it's of course going to be better to have those in charge who generally favor your politics but similar problems always arise from a powerful government. Doesn't matter if it's left or right. That's why decentralization and liberty is the way to go.

>>510651192
Anarchy, in its purest form just means no rulers.
Everyone left to their own devices with no one to tell them what to do.
A sane intelligent society would be able to pull that off, and prosper.

>>510668788
Why does Pirate Anon get it and NOBODY ELSE does?? REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>510668803
The. You can’t hold anyone accountable. No, you need Laws. Laws is what nature employs and look how well she runs shit. Observe natural laws, freedom of speech, right to bare arms, right to believe whatever the fuck you want, and right to ownership and movement. IT’S NOT THAT HARD.

>>510649428 (OP)

FUD - Fear - Uncertainty - Doubt

>>510669097
Lots of people are stuck in a phase of reacting to the left and playing partisan politics. Doing what their enemies do except with mildly varying tactics. Never gonna work. It's like defeating a monster by becoming one, what's that gonna solve? These people need philosophy

>>510670073
They are still stuck in the medieval era, anon. I am not kidding. They say that America is a young nation but they are 2000 years ahead of the rest of the world in terms of philosophy of governance. They worship the Roman Empire but they hate the Roman Republic. They venerate Carthage and mercantilism. They worship the laws of the sea (which is chaos, atomization, and the reason why globalism is a thing. Not having a land of your own meaning boarders have no value etc.)

If you read Machiavelli’s Discourses on Livy(?) and The Prince, he’ll tell you that a republic cannot exist if there are monarchies because monarchies are naturally weaker than Republics but Republics are militarily MUCH stronger. So monarchies subvert and invade and corrupt republics from the inside to destroy them.

Anyway, it all comes down to people not wanting to take responsibility for Themselves. For their actions, reactions, emotions, sustenance, protection, etc. Their “personhood” is centered in the “collective” and they project their inherent weakness on the rest of the collective and thus the Craving for an external “leader”. We need to set up our own internal Monarch, once who values virtue, liberty and justice. America tried, she tried really hard (she’s still trying btw) but Europe subverted her as early as the early 1800s and cemented after the Civil War…