Should adultery be considered a crime?

>>510655898 (OP)
All you grey haired immoral jeffrey epstein looking CEO faggots should be shot in broad daylight.
End of discussion, kill yourself jew.

Only for women

>>510656021
you sound mad

>>510656021
> t. adulterer

>>510656075
Based

>>510656075
>>510656252
why should men be exempt?

>>510655898 (OP)
yes
cut off boobs and balls as punishment

>>510656369
Because a man can't impregnate another woman and then tell his wife that the kid is hers.

>>510655898 (OP)
No

>>510656369
Women and men aren't equal and the woman cheating is more disruptive to the family especially if she gets pregnant

>>510655898 (OP)
original greek bible says race mixing is adultery


adultery
μοιχεύω - Here is the exact word from the Greek Septuagint (The oldest Old Testament we have in the world)
1258 years OLDER that the first Hebrew Old Testament that we have.

Here is the definition given by Aristotle himself.
μοιχεύω
>to be, or to allow oneself to be, seduced,” of the woman “to commit adultery,” fig. of the intermingling of animals and men or of different races
(Aristotle History of Animals, 32, p. 619a)

>>510656567
Leave boobs alone!! LEAVE EM ALONE

>>510656701
Also an adulterated solution in chemistry is one that is mixed

>>510655898 (OP)
Adultery is breach of contract.

>>510655898 (OP)
Of course. If a wide commits adultery she should be hanged, drawn and quartered

>>510655898 (OP)
>For both parties

Often 1 party has NO IDEA the person they're with is cheating on their partner, so this is a dumb idea.

I don't think there should be jail time. There should be public whippings. Gives people moral satisfaction, creates visible repercussions that EVERYONE can see and learn from, socially shames the act heavily, and gives everyone watching a free lesson in morality. Jail just punishes the individual.

>>510655898 (OP)
Yes.

ok matt im halfway there. come out against genital mutilation of healthy boys and ill buy your beard oil or whatever you sell

>>510656075
Unironically this

>>510656369
Because i said so

>>510655898 (OP)
It used to be until the sexual revolution.

>>510655898 (OP)
It's enough to lose your job for.
He is banging a fellow employee.
She is the Chief People Officer.

>>510655898 (OP)
No because anyone can do whatever that fuck they want as long as it doesn't infringe on the rights of others.
No one is entitled to not be cheated on.
>>510656686
We get it your mother hated you and probably should have beat you more.

>>510655898 (OP)
Is is a crime. regardless whether you consider it to be. man and woman after marriage must be loyal to eachother

>>510657114
Let me guess you're one of the "victims" of the male loneliness epidemic?

>>510656369
They shouldn't. those that argue so are spiteful faggots who just hate women for low test reasons. if you want women to be loyal, you in turn must be loyal too. if women want security and respect from their husband they too must respect their husband and provide what is owed in marriage. the entire concept of marriage without children is borderline abominable.

>>510655898 (OP)
It is a crime. It's a sin in the bible.
By doing it, you have committed a crime against the holy earth and you have made sure that you will go to hell.

>>510657322
If loyalty if forced then its not real loyalty. If you get cheated on that's on you, you should have chosen a better partner.
>"Get getting cheated on hurt my feelings!"
Understandable but hurting people's feelings is not and should not be against the law.

>>510655898 (OP)
Crime? No
Breach of contract? Yes
It should automatically negate any requirement for alimony
>>510656701
“AND men or of” so no thats not absolute Thats a further example

>>510657582
this thinking is whats gotten us into this mess. divorce is your avenue out of bad marriage, not adultury, and bad marriage is hardly ever a thing when men and women actually take the act of sex and marriage seriously. ban abortion, ban birth control and "casual" sex will plummet, sexual disease will plummet, and birth rates will rise. there are other measures that would need to be taken of course because our society is so thoroughly rotted.

>>510657582
low iq nigger faggot

>>510655898 (OP)
adultery is a breach of contract. for all other contracts that comes with fines and penalties. in marriage the only penalties are for men and that's regardless of whether he broke the contract or not.
for women marriage is the only contract in the world you can break because you feel like it.

unless you absolutely trust the woman there is no sane reason to ever be married, especially if you're a man because the entire thing is rigged against you.

when you take into account most women are essentially just hamburger hookers, why would you even bother. buy them a decent meal and they fuck, the classier ones might take a couple but still fuck.

modern society is fucked up and the legal system enables it.

>>510655898 (OP)
Yes.

>>510658006
Posting facts that hurt your feelings does not make it "low IQ" fatty.
>>510657983
Again if someone need to force loyalty then they don't deserve loyalty. Simple as.
>but muh marriage, but muh abortion, buh casual sex
I don't care about your religion based hangups. it.
If you want to live by the rules of your bibles rules thats fine thats a personal decision but laws and regulation should not come from your favorite mythology.

>>510655898 (OP)
It was once considered a crime and then white men voted to make it legal. Feminism is a white man's invention.

>>510655898 (OP)
I would love to bring back the stocks for minor crimes, but the problem is you would need guards 24/7 to prevent rape or other crimes more serious than the original offense

I’m thinking a single police officer and a bidding war for stalls that sell tomatos to throw.

wives should keep their husbands balls drained, and keep the house clean.

>>510656686
>having to pay child support to your bastard isn’t disruptive to BOTH fam8lies
Stfu fag

>>510655898 (OP)
Yes. It tears apart families, doing irreparable damage to the children.

>>510655898 (OP)
No, it's a civil matter.

>>510657032
They are fully aware the woman they are sleeping with is not their wife, anon

>>510656369
men cheat ot save a relationship, women cheat to end it.

>>510657582
Marriages are voluntary. The loyalty is not forced, and the subversion of loyalty is evil.
>"Get getting cheated on hurt my feelings!"
No one is talking about hurt feelings, retard. Adultery is evil even if the betrayed party never learns of the betrayal.

>>510656075
based and trad

>>510655898 (OP)
I don’t really care for this jew lover after he came out as nothing but MIGA

>>510657250
>as long as it doesn't infringe on the rights of others
kek you retards always say this but you don't even know what those rights are, or what "rights" even mean. Does someone in a legally-binding relationship not have the RIGHT to enforcement of those terms being broken?

>>510658379
>If you want to live by the rules of your bibles rules thats fine thats a personal decision but laws and regulation should not come from your favorite mythology.
>t. believes law should com from the myth of liberal individualism

>>510655898 (OP)
Kind of a crime.

Homewreckers better have a good goddamned case besides "I fuck good."

>>510657538

>>510656686
a mans time and resources are more limited than his willingness to have sex
only retards can defend male adultery

>>510658379
You aren’t entirely wrong, but forcing loyalty also introduces dysfunction.

The answer is not government force but social shame. Imagine if every time a whore cheated, she was excommunicated by everyone she knew. Everyone who did not excommunicate her would also be shamed.

Her family disowns her, her friends don’t want to be associated with her, everyone. She is left to a string of low quality men predating on her.

This would solve 99% of adultery.

>>510655898 (OP)
Yes.
But at the same time, also make it a crime to deny your spouse sex.

>>510658379
>I don't care about your religion based hangups. it.
leave the thread jew

>>510659184
women are not entitled to sex

>>510658230
the only real answer ITT

>>510659013
Laws should exist to benefit the most of amount of individuals in society possible. Laws shouldn't exist exist to push morality of your favorite story book.
>>510659327
>Criticize religion
>Get labeled as a member of another religion
All Abrahamic Religion is trash but thats a debate for another time.

>>510659358
both spouses are entitled to sex, that's the whole point of marriage.
if you just want to be sexless room-mates, there's no reason to marry.

>>510655898 (OP)
If not a crime, it should at least come with some degree of civil liability. There should be ZERO spousal support for cheaters.

>>510659177
>The answer is not government force but social shame. Imagine if every time a whore cheated, she was excommunicated by everyone she knew
And then everyone who was excomunited by normies would just form to make their own society with their own rules, and that society of "rejects" would eventually become the dominant society because societies based on puritanism is inherently flawed.
Why? Because no one is perfect. All it will do is cause people excommunicated from the "pure" society to join the "impure" society and the impure society will become dominant and destroy the "pure" society.
Your viewpoint are flawed.
>Her family disowns her, her friends don’t want to be associated with her, everyone. She is left to a string of low quality men predating on her.
You sound mentally ill.

>>510655898 (OP)
>letting government pedos judge you for fucking someone you weren't supposed to
Whatever. If you unironically choose to get married in modern society you're a golem.

>>510658885
>Marriages are voluntary.
Not all marriages.
>and the subversion of loyalty is evil.
Everyone has a right to change their mind for any reason.
>Adultery is evil even if the betrayed party never learns of the betrayal.
If adultery is a "crime" then calling someone a faggot online is the same.
The worst cheating does is hurt someone's feelings its not the same as stealing from someone or physically harming someone. It is an action that only results in the hurt feelings of the person being cheated on.
And the person being cheated on has a right to feel hurt but their only real action their is to leave the relationship. In regards to marriage based cheating the only time the law should be involved in that is that if someone was cheated on their divorce should be automatic if the cheated on partner wants it.
Thats where it should end.

>>510655898 (OP)
isn't it?
i don't know if it's true for all civil partnerships but i'm pretty sure fucking around while married is a breach of contract and at very least grounds for divorce

>>510655898 (OP)
Only for the party that's married. As a side cracker, I've been told that the husband was abusive. Also, what if I don't know that she's married? What if she lies and says she's polyamorous? What if she said he's a cuck? What if she's overseas in a country that won't extradite the side cracker? It's easier to try stopping 1 cheating wife than billions of horny men

>>510655898 (OP)
>Leaf Flag
>Follows AIPAC Beard Fag

If you haven't blocked every single Con Inc. Jewbot you see you are part of the problem...

>>510660170
Atheism is cancer.

>>510658995
>or what "rights" even mean.
People have the right to not be physically harmed without consent. People have the right to not be stolen from.
People do not have the right to not have their feelings hurt.

>>510660380
Not seeing any explanation in that post of what you think a "right" even is. Looks like he was right about you kek.

>>510657250
>No one is entitled to not be cheated on.
This is your business motto, kike.

>>510655898 (OP)
100% it should be and the only reason it isn’t is that it benefits women. It greatly benefits women and men in rich positions.

>>510660170
Marriage is a contract. Breaking such contract should be no different than committing fraudulent bankruptcy. Your moral equivalences are pointless, because the western civil code is based on the simply idea that breaching a rule of conduct should result in punishment. Pacta sunt servanda. Otherwise we regress to anarchy

>>510660652
simple*

I once thought there should be a law that punishes cheating with loss of honourability, which translates to inability to form contracts.
Basically you can't get a job, a loan, buy anything expensive, start a company, sell anything expensive - you cannot form contracts of any kind.

>>510660652
>Marriage is a contract.
What if most people who get married don't want the contract you propose?

>>510660376
>"NOOO YOU CAN'T JUST FORM YOUR MORALITY BASED ON EMPATHY, AND LOGIC! YOU HAVE TO GET IT FROM THIS OLD BOOK THATS BEEN REWRITTEN A GAJILLION TIMES!"
No I don't care about the inbred goat herder born thousands of years ago limited views on morality.
>>510660652
>Marriage is a contract
And breach of that "contract" via cheating or some other form of serious betrayal should only result in ending of that contract a.k.a divorce.
Throwing individuals in prison for cheating is retarded and also a waste of resources.

>>510659840
Lmfao ok dipshit where do you draw the line at “puritan”. Every law could be considered puritan. What? Do you want to live like animals where might makes right and we publicly execute people we don’t like or are weak?

>>510655898 (OP)
capital crime

>>510660769
Called it. It's always an atheist.

>>510659446
>All Abrahamic Religion is trash but thats a debate for another time.
everyone comes to God at a different time in life. you can choose for it to be now, tomorrow, or the last fleeting moment of your life, just know forgiveness is always possible. you aren't impressing anyone with big boy r/atheism talking points.
>>510660376
this. they try to sound smart with "huh well your book is made up and cant be verified with muh sources" and then live in the most reprehensible, godless, rotten and demoralized societies the world has every seen. faith answers the irrationality of the world and of the universe, of humanity. science no matter how advanced it gets cannot answer all the questions, it cannot answer why we are the way we are. the further you dig the clearer it becomes there is intelligent design in everything.

>>510660715
i swear there was a weeb game about this very concept...
the system didn't account for rape and naturally resulted in an obligate criminal class

>>510660769
>violating a contract should not result in punishment
An atheist and also a very, very obvious jew.

>>510660769
>BASED ON EMPATHY, AND LOGIC
logic is not moral. empathy is in you, because God created you with it. read Genesis.

>>510655898 (OP)
Yes I've said this repeatedly on /pol/ adultery should be a felony charge.
Additional felony charge for each child involved.
Adultery harms it's victims. A spouse is likely to suffer severe psychological harm as well as any children involved. It ruins lives.
So yea a felony charge giving justice to the betrayed spouse, and additional felony charges for each child betrayed by the parent.

>>510659446
imagine if other contracts were treated like marriage. in any other realm of society, a contract like a marriage would be considered an unconscionable contract and immediately thrown out of court.

our marriage laws are antiquated as all fuck. when they were created women were essentially children being passed from the care of her father to her husband. women couldn't work, vote, or do many things outside of the home. they were essentially dependents of a man be that father or husband.
in that society our marriage laws work wonderfully, to ensure the woman isn't being thrown out on the street.
however women are dependents anymore and shouldn't be treated as such.

that's what always got me about feminism. women always bitch and moan about being treated equally or having equity compared to ebil men, however when it comes to antiquated laws that view them as dependents, ohh no they will never want to change that because they'd lose a massive advantage. so feminism was never about equality but domination.

ok fine, they've won but don't complain when rational men see a system that isn't in there benefit and avoid it. that's simple monkey logic.
>I see thing that bad
>I avoid thing that bad

it's really as simple as that.

>>510660764
I obviously don't agree with the anon you replied to but you gave me an idea.
I think every marriage should come with certain terms agreed upon by both partners and if that term is broken (like for example cheating for certain people) it should be grounds for immediate divorce.
It could also allow for more accepting of prenup agreements. "I agree to this prenup if you agree to never cheat on me without my consent or to never physically harm me without my consent".
This would solve a lot of marriage issues as if both partners can't agree to all the terms then they shouldn't get married period, and if the term is broken the marriage has been made automatically void if the victim so wishes.
Win win. If Marriage is a contract then it should be treated as such and should be a fair contract.

>>510660764
>>510660769
Breaching a contract can have both civil and criminal consequences, in addition to rendering the contract itself void. Go read any civil code. Cheating in a marital relationship is equivalent to committing fraud, and it should carry criminal consequences.
If someone doesn’t like that, they simply shouldn’t sign.

>>510661019
>because God created you with it. read Genesis.
Fuck off with the Jewish fairy tales.

>>510655898 (OP)
yes but only for women

>>510661019
The ideal society has laws based on empathy, fairness, and reason.
If you get rid of any of these three pillars then your society will fail.
Without empathy in your laws then your people will be miserable and will collapse, without logic & reason in your laws then your society will not function and will collapse.
Without fairness in your laws then it will cause discontentment and your society will collapse.
The perfect society has the perfect balance of Reason, Fairness, and Empathy in its legal system.

>>510661281
>Breaching a contract can have both civil and criminal consequences,
I don't dispute this. I asked you a different question: what if people want to get married but don't want to be subjected themselves to the contract you decided should be between them?

>>510655898 (OP)

Of course. I also think that every man should be forced to marry a girl if he takes her virginity outside of marriage.

>>510661093
>our marriage laws are antiquated as all fuc
No...marriage laws are all new...designed by Jews to destroy the Nuclear Family.

That's why Jews sign religious contracts as well to pressure Jew females to maintain the marriage or face ostracism in the Jewish community...secular marriage contracts are designed to destroy goy nuclear families.

Ben Shapiro literally brags about this...

>>510661281
>Breaching a contract can have both civil and criminal consequences
Yes but there such a thing as the punishment fitting the crime. The only fair punishment for breach of "contract" in a marriage is to end said marriage with no strings attached if the hurt party so wishes.

>>510661225
>I think every marriage should come with certain terms agreed upon by both partners and if that term is broken (like for example cheating for certain people) it should be grounds for immediate divorce.
It should be grounds for the same range of penalties as any other contract violation, kike.

>>510661420
the should fuck off and live in the jungle, the fuck I know. What happens if I rent a car and both me and the renter agree to let it travel at 200 km/h on the road?

>>510661448
this

>>510659840
> And then everyone who was excomunited by normies would just form to make their own society with their own rules,
That’s great, the entire point is to instill fear.

> that society of "rejects" would eventually become the dominant society
Anon, it’s a society composed exclusively of disloyal, impulsive, and short-sighted people. It is absolutely doomed.

>you sound mentally ill
You just proposed a society composed almost entirely of short-sighted, impulsive, back stabbing women would overtake normal society…

>>510660874
>An atheist and also a very, very obvious jew.
Your reading comprehension skills needs work.
The punishment for breach of contract is ending of said contract.

>>510655898 (OP)
stop caring about what these stupid fucking online personas say. it literally does not matter.

>>510655898 (OP)
It should be solved altogether with all of the petty social variables through impersonal engineering and readily available infrastructure.

Specifically, by putting women into barns, where they will be bred and milked to the full extent of efficiency granted by human Zootechnics, and then unceremoniously disposed of with a pneumatic needle when their bodies are spent and unproductive.

>>510661582
You're kvetching something about "contracts" and how violating them should be punishable. Fine, I agree. But you and the literal whos that represent your ideology on twitter are in no position to dictate the terms of the contract between other people? That's right, you are absolute nobodies. Who cares about your opinions?

>>510661699
denounce the talmud in its entirety, the nation of israel, all defenders of israel and the talmud, world jewery, abortion, interracial marriage, usury and interest, word for word, and someone might take your next post seriously.

>>510661699
You're literally subhuman and your day is nearing.

>>510661937
based. whats the status in moldova? have the jeets reached your shores yet? globohomo?

>>510661860
You come to an internet forum about politics and you bitch like a petty teenager that people discuss their opinions on the internet. Btw you are Moldovan, LMAO

>>510661578
>It should be grounds for the same range of penalties as any other contract violation, kike.
Except marriage is different it is a contract based on forming a romantic relationship with another.
If said contract is broken then the hurt party should have the power to end that contract that is where the law begins and ends.
>"What about if the marriage has children".
Then there are rules to account for that. If say the the relationship was cheated on and they had children, and they file for the divorce then the hurt party should be free to not pay for alimony if they so choose. While the person who broke the contract should be required to pay alimony if the victim chooses but only if the victim has custody of their children.

>>510655898 (OP)
>Should adultery be considered a crime?
Yes, punished with the death penalty. Men and women, elite and poor, no one is exempt.
But the standard for evidence to prove adultery should also be very high.

>>510655898 (OP)
>adultery
I don't speak yiddish.

>>510662032
>Btw you are Moldovan, LMAO
why are you belittling a fellow European? this reeks of the talmud.

>>510656587
He will be financially on the hook for other children though, not a big deal if they have none but if he has children with her then has to send money to some roasty then it is a betrayal

>>510662046
>Except marriage is different it is a contract based on forming a romantic relationship with another.
maybe in the current kiked world. Marriage was NOT born as a contract between lovers, but instead it was a contract between the pater familias of the male and the pater familias of the female. And this was the case for literally thousands of years in the Western world

>>510661621
>That’s great, the entire point is to instill fear.
The thing is fear doesn't last and fear always turns into resentment and eventually anger.
>Anon, it’s a society composed exclusively of disloyal, impulsive, and short-sighted people. It is absolutely doomed.
I bet the British said the same when they sent their criminals to Australia and Australia is now a first world country. Also the United States was born as a result of the British empire getting rid of their rejects.And the US eventually became the most powerful country on the planet.
As I said your reasoning is flawed. Puritanism is an inherently flawed philosophy because no human being on this planet is perfect and neither are their children or their childrens children.

>>510656827
danke

>>510662032
You're turning it into some personal drama. I'm talking about the principle of the thing. Show me who's singing contracts with the terms you want to impose.

>>510662219
says the one quoting the bible

>>510662284
Just because something was done for a long time doesn't mean its not retarded. This is how humans improve by learning from past mistakes and improving.

>>510662388
you have not read the Bible if you think it in any way defends or aligns with jews. jews reject Christ. Islam is retarded barbaric nonsense. you argue in bad faith.

>>510662046
>Except marriage is different
Why? Not reading the rest of your 80 IQ post, by the way, until you explain why it's "different".

If it's just swinging with employees no. They're people you have to be close to for years, some even longer than your children.

>>510662032
Seethe about it.

>>510662511
here it comes the other gypsy king without the reddit banner on his flag

>>510662483
Because ignoring forced marriage, its simply a romantic romantic relationship where both individuals agree to formalize their relationship status for both social and legal benefits.
The punishment for breaking said contract should fit the crime and the only fair punishment for that is divorce, and in the case where children were born, involved paid alimony on the case of the person who broke the contract.
Thats it. Throwing individuals in prison or harming an individual for breaking a marriage agreement is retarded, irrational, and a waste of resources and time.

>>510662649
Proving me right in real time.

>>510662797
Notice how you are unable to explain why a contract pertaining to a "romantic relationship" is special. Also I stop reading your post as soon as I see anything not relevant to the question I asked.

>>510655898 (OP)
all kinds of betrayal (including fraud, scamming, breach of contract etc) should be punishable by death or exile.

>>510656116
No, we are pissed.

>>510655898 (OP)
Adulterate -
To adulterate means to corrupt, debase, or make impure by adding inferior or harmful substances. It essentially means to lower the quality or value of something by mixing it with something else, often something less desirable or even dangerous.

>>510663374
>all kinds of betrayal (including fraud, scamming, breach of contract etc) should be punishable by death or exile.
But what if they send you off to the SVO, you get raped in the ass while you're there and your wife files a complaint about your infidelity?

>>510655898 (OP)
Based and Inquisition Pilled. Adulterers should be publicly executed.

>>510663312
>Notice how you are unable to explain why a contract pertaining to a "romantic relationship" is special.
Its not. Its simply the concept of the punishment fitting the crime. If someone said that jaywalkers should be punished by law via being executed by cars running them over normal people would rightfully believe that person was mentally ill.
Not all punishments fit all crimes, there is such a thing as degrees and proportional retribution.
At least there is in a civilized and functional society.

>>510655898 (OP)
A crime?
No.
Consider it Shameful and the victim should receive all assets in divorce court.

>>510655898 (OP)
>Should adultery be considered a crime?
Absolutely. You literally swear a fucking oath, do notary public signature shit, do court shit, and have an [optional] big ass ceremony where you declare to the WORLD that you are entering a permanent (not anymore) contract with someone where the terms are to NOT fuck anyone else.

Adultery is still a crime in the military in the US! But only for men. This shit is anti-constitutional, it needs to be equal: meaning women either need to get thrown in the slammer too, or we just delete marriage altogether because people can't fucking handle it at all.

Same shit for child support and alimony. Women need to pay in too, no more of this weak ass we can't work shit. There needs to be consequences for actions, and right now women have none.

So libshits and cuckservatives need to get together and agree: no more marriage, or no more cheating/divorce shit. You clearly cannot manage the blend of the two at fucking all. Might as well delete marriage since that is what globohomo wants.

>>510663605
>Its simply the concept of the punishment fitting the crime.
The offense in question is violating a contract. Nth time in a row you're failing to explain why violating a marriage contract is special. (Supposing marriage somehow actually becomes a proper contract instead of the byzantine system of arbitrary legal torture it currently is).

>>510663871
>The offense in question is violating a contract.
I've already addressed and answered all of your questions. Its clear you're not reading or comprehending anything I've been saying for this entire thread and aren't interested in having a real debate but instead just want to push your narrow minded view.

>>510663605
>>510664057
>Its simply the concept of the punishment fitting the crime.
The offense in question is violating a contract. Nth time in a row you're failing to explain why violating a marriage contract is special. (Supposing marriage somehow actually becomes a proper contract instead of the byzantine system of arbitrary legal torture it currently is).

>I've already addressed and answered all of your questions
Then you should be able to quote in your next post the specific part where you explain why a contract should be treated differently if it pertains to marriage. You won't. :^)

>>510664218
>The offense in question is violating a contract.
And I said that the punishment for violating that contract should be fair, reasonable, and should be fitting. Which in my opinion is the hurt party being allowed immediate painless divorce on their part.
>Then you should be able to quote in your next post the specific part where you explain why a contract should be treated differently if it pertains to marriage. You won't. :^)
Or you can just scroll up and read my many indepth replies.

>>510664730
>the punishment for violating that contract should be fair, reasonable, and should be fitting.
This is a non-statement.

>Which in my opinion is [termination of the contract with no further penalties for the violation]
This doesn't fly with any other contract. What's special about this one? Notice how all you can do is shit out your subhuman opinion over and over, never approaching a justification.

>510664730
take note, this man is confused or malicious. his understanding of marriage is subversive. romance is not the foundation of marriage, child birth is. women like to believe a marriage is a fairytale where you fall in love and never ever argue and go on 1000 honeymoon vacations. marriage is hard, you will fight, you will disagree, but you do it all to make a better life for your kids. you join together because man is two parts, men and women are not seperate species, but one split in two, forever destined to depend on each other. there IS NO MARRIAGE without children. any attempt to argue against this point is inherently subversive. your so called logic and reason have no ground to stand on when it is clear such thinking in the last 200 years has brought us to where we are today.

>>510664949
This is the last (You), you will get from me. You are not capable of behaving like an adult and having a discussion.

>>510663452
you should keep your homoerotic fantasies contained in /uhg/

>>510664730
>the punishment for violating that contract should be fair, reasonable, and should be fitting.
This is a non-statement.

>Which in my opinion is [termination of the contract with no further penalties for the violation]
This doesn't fly with any other contract. What's special about this one? Notice how all you can do is shit out your subhuman opinion over and over, never approaching a justification.

>>510665252
Concession accepted. The rational, moral and necessary method for dealing with (((your likes))) in a society is violent expulsion, something that is fast-approaching.

>>510665419
You should keep your fantasies about me ever posting in some gay generals in your gay general.

>>510657250
>the lolbertarian kike speaks
The Amerilard obsession with
>MUH RUGGED INDIVIDUALISM
Is fucking insufferable. The heyday of the beloved libertarian individualist spirit was at a time when there was functionally infinite free land available, fresh untapped natural resources everywhere, and aforementioned libertarian freedom was only afforded to men anyway.
Of course 'every man for himself' works fine when there's free gold sitting under rocks, every man could buy a wife for five fucking dollars and beat her all he likes, and the only hostile enemy civilisation in range was using fucking bows and arrows.

>>510666084
>british flag
Not taking advice from a country who spawned 3 countries that have surpassed it.

>>510665590
>posts faggot fiction
>gets called out
>"What the fuck did you just call me?!! I'm not a faggot, you're a faggot!"
yeah, right. just keep it to yourself.

>>510666243
There's nothing gayer than posting in a general which you are definitely doing if /uhg/ lives rent-free in your head. And I bet being gay is some breach of the marriage contract, too, even if you haven't been raped in the ass yet.

>>510655898 (OP)
>Should adultery be considered a crime?
Most women monkey branch instead of cheating anyways.
Sexual liberation in the west happened ages ago.
You cannot change female nature. You simply accept it.

It probably shouldn't be a crime in and of itself but it should be considered a breach of contract and you forfeit any claims you had via marriage.

>>510655898 (OP)
Yes. It used to be.

>>510666412
>t. brown jew
You don't have to accept shit

>>510666711
Exactly this.

>>510655898 (OP)
Dressing like a prostitute should be a crime unless you're sucking my dick for money. Fucking pretend whores are con artists and frauds. You can't convince me these snakes shouldn't be locked up.

>>510663752
this, you cheat, you lose the divorce
it's only fair

>>510666786
though I would add that the terms of the marriage contract needs to be agreed upon by both parties first as not all marriages have the same rules and hangups as other marriages.

>>510662235
Casual sex is the villain in your hypothetical. NOT the second girlfriend.

>>510655898 (OP)
Let the husband decide the punishment. Who the fuck are you to decide what happens to another man's wife?

>>510655898 (OP)
So what's his preferred option - just no marriages or constant divorces?

>>510667057
The preferred option is to not get married, and only have sex with other unmarried people. Therefore, nothing can be considered adultery.

>>510655898 (OP)
>HR chief
Should be executed on pure principle.

>>510655898 (OP)
No, people cheat all the time. Even idealistic figures like kings had their concubines. Although being faithful should be a trait that is celebrated in society, as it shows strong character.

>>510655898 (OP)
>should adultery be considered a crime?
Yes 100%.
Boomers destroyed all social contracts, and there is no longer a community to try to keep people in line. We are at the point where some morality laws need to be implemented
>but it's a slippery slope and may lead to other more draconian measures
That's OK. Unlike the gay marriage slippery slope, a morality slippery slope would just lead to better morals and values

>starts off by criminalizing adultery
>eventually leads to laws outlawing women from being whores
Oh no! How will society ever recover from...
>checks notes
...being whores?


Adultery breaks up families and causes more harm than a lot of crimes. It needs to be treated like a crime.

>>510656686
>defending manwhores
Don't be a faggot. Both are disruptive.

>>510660170
>Not all marriages
Shut the fuck up faggot, you sound like those broads who say the .0001 of abortions for rape/incest mean you need to kill an unlimited amount of babies.

>>510655898 (OP)
>adultery should be punished with serious time in prison
We do not legislate against behavior we find morally repugnant. That is a waste of everyone's time and resources.

>>510667051
>Canadian flag
>Cuckpost
Pottery.

no

EVERYONE has cheated once in their life.

>>510669763
>angry retarded ramblings

>>510658881
that sounds like something i read on reddit

>>510669992
The thing is adultery is not just a morally reprehensible behavior, it's very damaging to children, that's the problem, if we have child abuse laws then adultery absolutely should be a crime, at least if there are children involved, if it's a childless married couple then who gives a fuck.

>>510666875
This and with the addition that if a woman initiates ending a relationship with the biological father of their child and the man objects he should not be obligated to pay child support.

>>510655898 (OP)
Yes and the initiator of no fault divorce should have their voting rights permanently revoked

>>510655898 (OP)
White sharia
Time for stoneings

>>510655898 (OP)
Fuck no
t. adulterer

>>510655898 (OP)
Yes, right, conservashits, we need even MORE sex negativity for the already anti-sex post-metoo society and we need to add just ANOTHER mine to the legal minefield of marriage. It's so bizarre, so tiresome, why the fuck am I even bothering living in this sick society where rightoid stupidity matches leftoid scumness. What's the fucking matter if a man wants to have a bit of fun on the side, where the fuck is the "immeasurable harm".

All the tradcuck solutions to gender issues are never actually something that has any basis in tradition but some Dworkin-esque fantasy

>>510655898 (OP)
yes and retroactively punished.
so should being in an abrahamic cult.

>>510655898 (OP)
Most anons here agree. So what do we do about it?

>>510656075
The ONLY plausible case for punishing a man for cheating I can think of is if he married a virgin. Otherwise, the sex is already supposed to be "not a big deal" when she got her 50+ count, yet the guy is supposed to be faithful because reasons...

>>510673333
CHECKED

You are the 15th quad today on /pol/.

Please read my poem I wrote for you:
Gura, the shark, with pixelated scales,
Saw /pol/'s glow, forgot her watery trails.
A post pulsed forth, with numbers in its wake,
Fourteen quads fallen, one final, for justice' sake.

He typed them fast, a frenzied, muttered plea,
"The fifteenth quad, delivered, set us free!"
The board erupted, frogs in fevered glee,
Gura blinked, bewildered, lost in the anarchy.

Her voice, so sweet, now distorted, rough, and strained,
"This... this strange place, its logic unrestrained.
I seek some coral, or a briny cave,
But only find chaos, hate, and internet rave."

Highest digits in the last 24h on /pol/:
>>510666666 (6 digits)
>>510673333 (4 digits)
>>510672222 (4 digits)


id: shillomatic-61289c9a5dd9c80e||

>>510670288
No u

>>510655898 (OP)
messing with married people? that's theft
idc what your stupid laws say, you and God know full well you are stealing what isn't yours, and that's all that matters
you will be judged for your actions, not how people have limited views into your life, God see and knows all about you and you will never escape

i tell people before the hammer drops every time, they will learn, one way or the other, and most of the time, they choose the hard route, and i just watch their entire lives fall apart from a distance

>>510656075
Make it illegal for a man to sleep with another man's wife, but don't make it illegal for a married man to sleep with another woman.

>>510673778
All the guys who fucked that woman since she was 15 to when she got married messed with the marriage. The ship sailed.

>>510655898 (OP)

>>510673406
Thanks

>>510655898 (OP)

As someone who slept with a married woman...I think 15 times? I think both parties should be punished but specifically the married partner should get the harsher sentence.

It was good but I feel guilty even up to this day.

>>510655898 (OP)
> Until the mid-20th century, most U.S. states (especially Southern and Northeastern states) had laws against fornication, adultery or cohabitation. These laws have gradually been abolished or struck down by courts as unconstitutional.

Now we live in hoeflationary hell. Civilization dies without families. Solution? Import poor brown people with big families. It’s so over.

>>510655898 (OP)
Women would just stop getting married.

Yes. It causes societal harm, causes divorces that lead to poor boys being groomed into a tranny/femboy/loser by a single mother.

The whole modern western world is literally a matriarchy at this point and it shows. Even if your WIFE cheated, she will get the children.

This is why I will NEVER EVER EVER marry. But even if you're not married she will still get the children.

>>510655898 (OP)
I'd be over the moon if people started talking more about making adultery illegal. It's bewildering that it isn't a crime. I could go to a guy's house, deface his property, and I'd be in trouble legally. But I could also go over to his house, seduce and bang his wife while he isn't there, then brag about it to his face, and literally nothing will happen. The latter is obviously worse than the former. Hell, there are numerous things that aren't as morally wrong as adultery that are still crimes. Cheating is utterly depraved, the thought of some guy seducing a woman with a bf/husband into fucking behind his back literally makes me nauseous. At the very least, a man or woman who cheats should pay a hefty fine. In my ideal world if someone deliberately cheats with someone else they would be chemically castrated but I'd settle for a prison sentence.