Is it true that historically only 40% of men ever passed down their genes? - /pol/ (#510677342) [Archived: 349 hours ago]

Anonymous ID: 5G57RFyMUnited States
7/18/2025, 2:40:07 AM No.510677342
51vaiv-1952038252
51vaiv-1952038252
md5: e9bebdf3a5b58506728f250ec90d3353🔍
Replies: >>510677549 >>510677633 >>510677659 >>510681037
Anonymous ID: +hkCKNINUnited States
7/18/2025, 2:43:13 AM No.510677549
>>510677342 (OP)
considering male mortality rate
yeah maybe
Anonymous ID: z57mW6KVUnited States
7/18/2025, 2:44:23 AM No.510677633
>>510677342 (OP)
Frankly I'm surprised it's that high
Replies: >>510679576
Breakroom’s Dick ID: kRPzzK4eUnited States
7/18/2025, 2:44:48 AM No.510677659
>>510677342 (OP)
Genghis Khan fucked like 4 million women in his life and even made a quarter of them pregnant. So yeah. Chad fucks, beta bucks
Anonymous ID: RsM/YoZICanada
7/18/2025, 2:46:36 AM No.510677776
Historically, half of women died of childbirth complications
Anonymous ID: L6OgqiFKUnited States
7/18/2025, 3:01:43 AM No.510678794
no, it's like 20%.
Anonymous ID: 64KWghw3United States
7/18/2025, 3:12:43 AM No.510679576
>>510677633
In other words.
Anonymous ID: j2dkLh4uGreece
7/18/2025, 3:33:09 AM No.510681037
>>510677342 (OP)
yes but it was because of the high lethality of being a male hunter-gatherer

people spoiled by the safety of today read figures like that and assume an incel dystopia