>>510682853>Stanley kubrick meeting with NASA execs and astronautsTo discuss the camera equipment they took up there.
>Visible strings above astronauts in certain lightings and anglesFaked footage, no strings visible in the real footage.
>Bizarre background lightning and in generalLiterally the first footage from another planet, "bizzare" is pretty much expected when you have literally no reference.
>Comically shoddily slapped together lander, literally taped tin foil exterior of the frameUsed as a lightweight heat shield, unlike the tiles used on orbiters they don't need to be built to withstand launch because it's inside fairings.
>Bizarre physics effects of the lander and the astronauts, especially when the astronauts fall overOnce again, literally the first footage of what movements look like in low gravity while wearing cumbersome spacesuits.
>Almost exact perfect proportions and sizes and distances of the sun and the moon to have perfect eclipses and moon cycles when viewed from earth And?
>(statistically so improbable that it borders impossible)[citation needed]
>Never returnedAnd?
>even though we have supposedly maintained a space station for decadesThe space station has value has a place to study the effects of microgravity and the near earth space environment. The moon currently has no such value. They got their rocks and studied them, proving a bunch of theories as to how the moon was formed and its composition. Maintaining a moon base would require a considerable effort and it's not high priority enough unlike during the cold war where the moon race was used as a capitalism VS communism flex.
Multiple countries that hate the USA have confirmed the landing sites. You physically cannot argue that the moon landing is fake without a global conspiracy that involves countries that would 100% jump at the opportunity to humiliate the other for some reason participating in the lie.
Why would soviets not expose the USA for faking it if they did?