>>510682459 (OP)I think the cut off for personal wealth ought to be around $100mil, I'm no expert though and we could play with those numbers. But yeah, you could cut a billionaires wealth in half and they'd still be rich as kings. For some reason, cutting rich people's wealth is a scary concept for some, mostly on the right. They don't seem to understand the sheer proportions though, just how insanely wealthy a handful of people are in this world. Should we really prioritize allowing a few to remain ludicrously wealthy, to continue to horde wealth in offshore vaults, never to be spent or seen again, while half the planet struggles just to make it? I know we're not a logical species, but it is mindboggling to think about. We could feed and house every mother fucker who exists, yet we don't.
Nah, just kidding. The ceo's work is millions of times more valuable than ours. They deserve a 2nd yacht while my lazy 60+ hour/week working ass can't hardly afford rent in a big city