No one can refute the transcendental argument for God.

>>510705544 (OP)
TAG is undefeated. Atheists on suicide watch.

>:))
faggot

>>510705657
:))

>>510705544 (OP)
> 40
She should have tried 20 years ago.

>>510705544 (OP)
True

>>510705544 (OP)
Ask her if it is true Japanese womans love indians

>>510705544 (OP)
>No one can refute the transcendental argument for God.
No one can make a transcendental argument for God without essentially circular reasoning based on premises like "knowledge is impossible without God" which, when questioned, result in a descent into ever more vague and questionable philosophical justifications.

>>510706364
its true, I'm a Japanese woman

>>510706747
omfg Indians were right! We are fucked

>>510705544 (OP)
Buddhist philosophers refuted it 10,000 times but the West prefers to ignore it.

>>510706791
>Buddhist philosophers refuted it 10,000 times but the West prefers to ignore it.
Interesting. Explain.

>>510706573
Everything reduces to circularity, that's why it's about coherent epistemology, what makes knowledge impossible and what makes it possible.

>>510706573
Are you the same moldovan guy from this thread I created?
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/450732547/#450732547
If so what's up bro

>>510707216
>it's about coherent epistemology, what makes knowledge impossible and what make
"Knowledge is possible" is as good a starting point as "knowledge is impossible without god" as far as coherence goes.