>>510725994That's not very consistent of you.
The reason real CP is illegal, and should be, is because it necessitates a victim, the victim can not consent for a multitude of reasons.
The reason drawn shouldn't matter, is because it has no victim. It is a drawing, it has no will or personhood. It is not alive, nor was it ever alive. It is pixels or ink. The person who made it is an adult that consented to it.
If we argue that "Consumption is bad for you and must be banned, because you WILL act on it", then we must refer to
>>510725923where we clearly see as video games became more realistic, widespread, and widely adopted, violent crime has fallen and stagnated far below when video games were primitive and niche. As GTA V becomes one of the best selling games of all time, violence didn't go up, despite the game being named after a violent felony and the plot revolving around criminals being criminals.
It really just comes down to "I don't like it, and all the data says there's no correlation, and may even be an inverse correlation, but I'll argue like it's tenfold because of it instead."