Should sexbots and sexual AI be banned?

>>510726389 (OP)
Menbros... it's over

If all women disappeared we'd have genetically engineered catgirls in 5 years.

>>510726389 (OP)
Ban cunts first

>flags

not , just demanding the product

>>510726389 (OP)
>noooooo I’m going to become obsolete! please think of me!

>>510726389 (OP)
>label the men
Why this distinction? Plenty of women use AI chatbots as well.

>>510726396
you know why

>>510726389 (OP)
Should Twitter Screencap Threads be banned?

>>510726389 (OP)
>men voluntarily removing themselves from the gene pool
>PREDATORS
pick one

so shes agreeing that all vibrators be banned too?

>>510726400
Does it matter? This gender doesn't know struggle. They go on Tinder and get 200 matches for literally just existing. They get their orgasm, complementary free dinner, and then discard the man.

>>510726392
Not like xhe would have anything to worry about

/pol/tards: MUH BIRTH RATE AND WHITE RACE

also /pol/tards: NOOOOO. DON'T TAKE AWAY MY SEX BOT!!!!!! STOP TELLING ME TO RACE MIX WITH CHING CHONGS!!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!

>>510726389 (OP)
Thats a tranny

>>510726401
The pink haired she-monster who made that post hasn't ever felt a warmth between her legs that wasn't running on batteries

>>510726389 (OP)
That won't happen, but I understand why she's seething. Women will lose a lot of power because of sexbots and 'sexual AI'.

>>510726389 (OP)
No and anyone who says "yes" deserves the rope.

>>510726400
a cool girl would then just macgyver their own with an old mobile phone vibration motor and other components!

Feminist group will ask payment companies to stop working with companies that make sex bots.

>>510726409
There is too much money to be made from sex bots. They can scream and cry and I'm sure they will but this is a technology that they cannot stop.

>>510726410
Atleast they cant boycott Musk anymore. Musk exposed the cult of Trump derangement syndrome from GARM and took them to court. They folded immediately. But the US gov is investigating GARM and finding more and more things every month from them. Few weeks ago, we found out GARM was working with Australia/Europe to get the gov to censor Twitter because of Trump. Weeks BEFORE Musk took over. Openly political advertisement agency conglomerate forcing collective boycott on a company for politics with aid from foreign government. People who pay attention now understand, have evidence and know the fallout of this campaign. Instead of killing X, X is now worth close to $200+ billion as it got acquired by xAI

>>510726402
Nothing of value is lost

>>510726389 (OP)
The impression I'm getting from you guys is that you hate shit like vaccines because they explicitly help people and you have to cope with that kekypow

>>510726409
Why are the CEO's of these companies such cucks? A schizo letter from some irrelevant interest group flies into their inbox and they forfeit their integrity.
>inb4 they never had integrity to begin with
ok, yes. But even finance-wise, why cut off this market? The credit card companies collect fees everytime their services are used, even when it is used to buy a hentai magazine

>>510726414
Because there is a veiled threat. Western games company openly welcome these feminist groups. Have you not been paying attention to the western games for the last 10+ years? Its all woke slop. This is because feminist groups have connections. On top of that, journos are all left wing that promote the woke slops. Anyone that refuses the woke slop gets negative reputation damage by having journos print out fake outrage against Steam/any company that refuses woke slops.

You aren't blind are you? We see the pattern everywhere whenever someone refuses, they get negative coverage. This is a blackmail coersion with captured industries that can smear people/companies without any repercussions. Free speech is great and its especially great for media who can do so freely with strong protections. This is one reason why there are no news organization that can be trusted. The most trusted news is weather news. Everyone else has below 50% rating with political bias skewing those 50%. Anyone with a functioning brain that can think for themselves and connect the dots have rejected the media. But free thinking people aren't the majority of humans. They're the minority, for the majority of the world, political ideological conditioning reigns. So for 50% of the country, your company will get their reputation tarnished.

>>510726389 (OP)
>dat hairline


"she" wants AI gooners publicly shamed because "she" thinks in "her" deranged, porn-addled mind that men will suddenly become attracted to "her" due to a lack of options (they never will even if "she" was the last xem/xir on earth lol)

>>510726415
>Have you not been paying attention?
I do. So far, the woke-infested games have (mostly) failed at actual sales, despite positive media coverage. Bud and Jaguar had their sales crumbled. Which is why i'm so surprised by this. Bending to woke has net-negatives on your finances, except if you get propped up from BlackRock, i guess.
Tbh, i never watch news or read articles. I browse 4chan to see what is going on or through friends as proxy.
>But free thinking people aren't the majority of humans
You are correct. I assumed CEO's would be a litlle wiser and not bend the knee, considering their salaries and postion. Mastercard and Visa are fucking payment processors, not an intellectual think tank.
>So for 50% of the country, your company will get their reputation tarnished
Only the extremists actually care about the political alignment of a company. A company is either too woke or bigoted, depending on who you ask.
The actual problem is the company censoring something that is legal out of political motivation, overstepping their responsibilities. It doesn't matter for which reason exactly the censoring is being done, the act itself is condemnable. It would actually make sense here to apply governmental intervention to prevent them from doing this. But the government is corrupt too. Bruh

>>510726405
Some people would be desperate enough

>>510726389 (OP)
>aposematism profile pic

>>510726389 (OP)
The femoid fears the sexbot, for it renders her powerless. Withholding sex is the one and only advantage women have to pull on men, without that their absolute lack of any utility beyond childbirth will be apparent.

Also I'm pretty sure that's a troon freak in the picture lmao

>>510726389 (OP)
wtf i love israel now

>>510726389 (OP)
Hey! It's AI sexbots that keep me from predation.

>>510726403
Artificial wombs, it's that simple

After sex bots we need bots that are skilled at raising children.

>>510726414
Some troons outright threat to kill the wife and kids of CEOs if they dont do some shit

>>510726398
please

>>510726389 (OP)
Meanwhile women have an entire closet of dildos and sex toys lol femoids are afraid they're being replaced by both sexbots and cute femboys.

>>510726389 (OP)
No. There is $ in them so they will not be banned. Not sure why women would complain for? They even say non-stop how much they hate men so you would think they would want to see less of them in public. Never ceases to amaze me how women are like the angel fish who tells you water doesn't exist despite him living in it. Starting to think you guys are right about women just being mere livestock seeing how they act just like such.

>scared of eye contact with a woman
>talk to robutt instead
>dangerous predator

What are the men predating on, a fucking machine?
>ooh girl your zeros are thicccc

>>510726389 (OP)
Women who obsess over sexual predators can only get attention from sexual scavengers.

>>510726389 (OP)
if you view those things as a "threat" you only had your hole to offer in the first place.

>>510726389 (OP)
I wish women never got their rights, never, it was huge civilization-scale mistake...

>>510726389 (OP)
A sexual predator? Like women who prey on successful men through the use of sexual attraction? It's time to shut these bitches up. I'll write up a biological comparison between female creatures that prey on their male counterparts and women. You will all hate women. Have a good day.

>>510727222
>There is $ in them so they will not be banned.
They might not fully ban it but the US, UK and others will regulate it. Only Japan and maybe some other Asian countries will have access to the best ones due to laxer laws and enforcement.

did OP really just make this faggy twitter thread across multiple fucking boards?
>>510711077

>>510726389 (OP)
I'm labeling that man too.

>>510726389 (OP)
We need to ban trannies and feminists.

Put me down for a pre order so my robo wife can cook, clean, and only speak when spoken to. Obviously a.i. you can change the settings for more conversation later on, but it would be cool to not deal with random onset BPD, periods and bleeding stank as fuck vaginas from fat whores who want to make a bakery from their yeasty fuck holes.
Please give me a sanitary, non emotional support robot. I hate women, legitimately.
Cyborg wouldn't divorce rape me, cyborg wouldn't have my kid then go to the government for assistance and literally steal the child (because they can't reproduce). Full stop,women need to shut the fuck up and do more for their man instead of the clubs security and their boss. Sick of this gay ass society.

No. But I wouldn't be surprised that women do want them banned. It takes away their sex power.

>>510726389 (OP)
>word salad
How is a sexbot haver on par with real predators
I love their dumb takes
Rusty Holes have to desperately frame everything through abuse rhetoric as they have no actual power
It goes back to the old days where everything is sexist to be heard and seen

>>510726389 (OP)
What are women going to do when the power of pussy goes away?
That's a terrifying thought.
No more attention.
No more control.
No more special treatment.
They are going to be treated like men and lose their fucking minds.

>>510727222
men using chatbots = less simps giving money to women

>>510726389 (OP)
>Should sexbots and sexual AI be banned?
No, they WILL be banned. 100%. If all women vote to ban them and a tiny percentage of men also vote to ban them in order to please women, then it's inevitable to happen. That's democracy for you, chuds.

>Ban men for having sexual desire
>Let women monetize their body and use their sexuality however they like
Typical feminist

Why would I care about what a tranny thinks?

Passport bro movement should have already made these screeching roasties obsolete