The letter itself is real. But the "Trump Epstein Letter" does not have TRUMP in it. It just says DONALD. And the signature does not match Donald Trump's. It was sent by some other person named "Donald."

I have seen it. That's why the WSJ didn't release it. I can't leak this any other way without getting caught and fired.

The signature doesn't match Trump's. DONALD BARR is who most likely wrote it, a writer and CIA agent and father of Attorney General William Barr.

>>510735353 (OP)

Can mods please ban these posts? Trump is the commander in chief, and has asked us to stop talking about it. Continuing to do so is basically illegal and treason.

>>510735437
t. GLOWNIGGER

if you were an insider, you would have leaked it.
oh well.

I think Trump created the letter. It’s so ridiculous that everyone will think it’s fake and start defending Trump.

Donald Barr as in Bill Barrs father instead?

>>510735521
I can't leak it. I work at WSJ but don't have a copy. Only the top editors have a copy. I saw it on a computer screen. They don't want it leaked because the DONALD signature doesn't match Trump's.

>>510735437
Stfu faggot. We DEMAND the list and WILL get it if we put enough pressure on that rapist

>>510735353 (OP)
Real perp identified.

>>510735606
post date and wsj pen or some shit

>>510735353 (OP)
>>510735606
Very interesting. Any other info you can give us?

>>510735353 (OP)
>The letter is from a Donald
>There's no surname
>It must be Donald Trump there's no one else with the name Donald
This is pathetic even for the WSJ

>>510735590
Yes, the DONALD is Donald Barr, William Barr's father.

The letter doesn't contain the name "Trump". It's just "Donald" with no last name. The signature doesn't match Trump's.

>>510735819
Donald Barr quit Dalton seven months before Epstein was announced as working there, so it's unlikely he hired him. So no, I doubt it's Donald Barr, and your insistence that it is casts doubt on your motivation for making up this shit.

>>510735750
I'm a fucking low level proofreader. I don't know how metadata works. Any picture I post could be tracked back to me. I don't want to get fired or Arkancided.

Go read the WSJ story CAREFULLY. They never show the letter or say that the name "Trump" is anywhere in the letter. The only name in the letter is DONALD and it is likely Donald Barr. Since when does Trump write poetry? Donald Barr wrote sci fi novels where kids have orgies and get sex trafficked to adults. And he writes about all that approvingly.

The fact that they won't show you the letter is proof Trump's signature doesn't match.

>>510736010
I didn't say I was 100% sure it was Donald Barr. I know it isn't Donald Trump. The "Donald" signature doesn't match Trump's.

And Donald Barr absolutely hired Epstein. We have that locked down.

>>510736010
New teachers are hired the year before, you fucking retard. You think schools hire teachers on August 31 for the semester starting September 1?

>>510736010
hire was before the exit, epstein started after

>>510735819
>Yes, the DONALD is Donald Barr, William Barr's father.
>>510736506
>I didn't say I was 100% sure it was Donald Barr.
Fuck off, retard.

>>510736596
New teachers are hired more than eight months in advance? LOL you have never worked at a school, you fucking retard.

>>510736644
>ya huh
>i will shape my theory to make it fit the facts
Yeah, that's all I've heard since I started posting this years ago. You faggots are ridiculous.

>>510736719
its the only other donald we know off in epsteins orbit and it fits 1000%

https://www.teachersoftomorrow.org/blog/insights/what-are-the-best-time-to-find-teaching-jobs/
>When Most New Teachers Are Hired?
>The peak hiring season for new teachers is during the summer months, particularly June, July, August, and September, each scoring a 10/10 on the hiring scale. These months are critical because schools finalize their staffing for the upcoming academic year. Most teaching positions open during this time as districts clearly understand their budget, student enrollment numbers, and any vacancies caused by retirements or resignations.
>For example, June marks the end of the academic year, and schools use this time to assess which positions must be filled. Many interviews occur this month as schools aim to get a head start on hiring. By July and August, hiring activity reaches its peak. Administrators are under pressure to secure new teachers before classes begin, often conducting a second round of interviews to address last-minute staffing needs. August and September account for many new hires, filling many positions just weeks—or even days—before the school year starts. September remains strong because 1 in 5 new teachers are hired this month, often in response to unexpected enrollment increases or last-minute resignations.
Meanwhile...
>The Hardest Times to Get Hired as a New Teacher
>On the other end of the spectrum, November and February are among the hardest times to secure a teaching job

>>510736358
>likely Donald Barr
you just said it definitively wasn't based on what you saw at work. looks fren, don't want you to get in trouble but you gotta prove somehow. if you're a proofreader what article is gonna come out later today that you are reviewing? otherwise this is a LARP

>>510735353 (OP)
Do you seriously care more about your job at a despicable country than saving your important president's face?
Leak that shit, publicize it, make a go fund me, be richer than before, get a job at a worthy company.

No shit it's fake. Look at it. Fake as fuck. I hope Trump sues them so hard they have to fire a bunch of people like CBS is doing right now.

>>510735437
This isn't even funny it's just cringe.

>>510736719
>>510736010
Incorrect. Donald Barr left Dalton in June and Epstein was hired in September, just 3 months later.

>>510737027
>>510737208
Barr left in June and Epstein started in September. Not a long shot to say that Epstein was hired by him.

>>510737036
You're apparently illiterate.

I've seen the letter on a computer screen at WSJ. The signature doesn't match Trump's. It just says "Donald." Nothing in the letter says it's Trump. It just says "Donald."

It was not sent by Donald Trump. It was sent by some other Donald.

>>510737065
>Leak that shit, publicize it, make a go fund me, be richer than before, get a job at a worthy company.
I don't have a copy to leak. It is only available to the EIC and about four other people. They showed it to us on a computer screen.

>>510735353 (OP)
I dont care, im not bumping this shill thread either.
Get fucked kikes.
Release the files

Wouldn't it be easy enough to track down something with Donald Barr's signature?

>>510737416
Yeah I fucked up my last post, but don't get nasty with me you journalist scum. If you were a true hard nosed journalist with an ounce of integrity you would leak that shit.

>low level proofreader
lmfao checks out

>>510735353 (OP)
WSJ is run by the same goons that run Fox. That letter is a Zionist charade. Trump is in on it. Stop being retarded.

>>510737416
Why does WSJ try to pull crap like this? Do they really hate Trump that much that they're willing to destroy their credibility with an obvious fake?

Now they're getting sued by Trump too. Was it worth it?

>>510737583
You know that if you don't bump a thread, somebody can reply and bump, right?

Or are you a dumb nigger?

BUMP

>>510737765
WSJ is going to lose millions of dollars when Trump sues them.

donald barr died in 2004. highly unlikely that an 81 year old man who knew epstein 30 years prior would be asked to contribute to this 50th birthday album for epstein. seems much more likely that only epstein's closest friends would be writing him birthday wishes for a bound album. and trump was epstein's closest friend at the time (as epstein admitted on tape in an interview with michael wolff). also, wall street journal is not gonna expose themselves to inevitable lawsuits and millions of dollars in damages if their evidence isn't rock solid. OP's post is just the latest and most pathetic MAGA cope for their pedo king

>>510737789
>Why does WSJ try to pull crap like this? Do they really hate Trump that much that they're willing to destroy their credibility with an obvious fake?
WSJ hates Trump because he's deporting all the illegal slave labor big business relies on for profits. And he's putting tariffs on shit so they can't just move operations offshore and use slaves in their home countries.

>Now they're getting sued by Trump too. Was it worth it?
Not their money. Rupert Murdoch's money.

>>510738011
>wall street journal is not gonna expose themselves to inevitable lawsuits and millions of dollars in damages if their evidence isn't rock solid
Trump can't win a lawsuit due to New York Times v. Sullivan. They have zero fear about lying because that case covers them totally. And it's Rupert Murdoch's money.

>>510737764
I don't have it to leak, dumbass. The actual document is only on the EIC's computer and about four others. I don't have access to it. I can't even pull it up to look at or I'd take a pic with my cell phone.

>>510737735
>Wouldn't it be easy enough to track down something with Donald Barr's signature?
I haven't found anything with his signature on it. He died in 2004. Even if I found it, I don't have the Epstein Letter available to compare it to. I saw it on a computer screen.

>>510738011
>donald barr died in 2004. highly unlikely that an 81 year old man who knew epstein 30 years prior would be asked to contribute to this 50th birthday album for epstein.
Barr was Epstein's CIA handler.

>>510738277
yawwwwn, so you have nothing? source trust me bro?

shit larp

>>510738619
This

>>510738277
Checked I’m actually starting to plausibly believe you anon… Take a random picture of the street outside your office or somewhere in the NYT with a logo somewhere and post it here. They cannot get the metadata from your picture on 4chan.

>>510738711
OP is obviously telling the truth. If the signature matched, why won't WSJ publish the document?

Hint: The signature doesn't match.

>>510739290
That’s what I was wondering like where the fuck is the picture? Why not publish it?

>>510735353 (OP)
>WSJ Insider Here

>>510739119
>They cannot get the metadata from your picture on 4chan.
I have zero confidence in 4chan stripping the metadata. It may be stripped on what gets posted here but they might keep a copy with my metadata in it. I'm not some techie, I'm a proofreader. If I get doxed or fired or sued for leaking I'm done for. No other news org would hire me, ever.

WSJ brags all the time about how all they have to do is send subpoenas duces tecum to find out who did it if anything leaks. I believe them.

>>510739384
They won't publish it because the "Donald" signature on the letter looks absolutely nothing like Donald Trump's real signature.

It's not a forgery. The letter is from some other person named Donald.

>>510739557
I mean I 80% believe you because it’s not like you’re larping about being some senior insider who’s just a proofreader and most of your posts aren’t the usual larpers responses… Why would they show a lowly proofreader the image? Was it like a PowerPoint presentation to a bunch of people?

>>510735353 (OP)
When do we get to the Lost Tapes? Will there be dinosaurs? This is embarrassing.

>>510739290
>"letter Reviewed by the Journal"
because they don't have it in their possession, was likely leaked to them. I'm not saying it's definitive, but based on Trumps behavior lately I'm convinced he's hiding something, demonstrating all of the qualities of a liar getting caught. Simple as.

I also don't believe the LARP, pretty simple for OP to prove. Scared to leak but leaking anyway kek you are still traceable OP

>>510736010
Donald Barr was allowed to resign after complaints about how he disciplined students. We have no direct evidence that Donald Barr hired Epstein. What we do have is circumstantial evidence that Donald Barr was a former OSS agent (CIA precursor) that may have continued in his role after the war, as many did, and many in education, that he had a habit of hiring teachers that were unqualified, and that he also was interested in sexual relations with underage girls.

>>510740162
They’re also claiming it was a part of bound collection… WHERE THE FUCK IS THE BOUND COLLECTION?!?

>13 pbtid

>>510735606
so the signature matches donald barr's?

>>510739966
>Was it like a PowerPoint presentation to a bunch of people?
Yes, they called us in and told us a HUGE story was about to come out. They told us what it was. They flashed the "Trump-Epstein letter" for bit on a large computer monitor we have in the newsroom. The signature looks nothing like Donald Trump's actual signature and the name "Trump" is not in the letter.

I don't know what else I can say here. The WSJ won't release the image. That should prove to anybody that it's bullshit. But people are fucking stupid. "I have a document and here's what it says. No you can't see it, only I can see it." That is ALWAYS a lie.

>>510735353 (OP)
Trump is going to prison or dying of McDonald's disease.
And his voters will be killed in the streets.
And Epstein's banker friends will be relentlessly tortured.
this nation will be recovered from these lying shit fuck financial criminals.

>>510740406
I have never seen a Donald Barr signature. All I can confirm is that it isn't Trump's. Donald Barr is the most likely suspect if it isn't Trump.

If you have a Donald Barr signature, posy it so I can compare.

>>510740323
We were told the "bound collection" is held by the DOJ. A DOJ leaker sent us the "Donald NOLASTNAME" letter that WSJ pretends is from Trump.

>>510736358
I am a fucking goat level vibe-reader. This man is telling the truth.

>>510740323
I'm assuming in FBI possession and it's being leaked by someone. But who knows, strange times, just gotta wait and see and keep making noise.

I don't understand the Trump cope though, he's in more pictures with Epstein than anyone else I've seen. I voted for him every election by the way, and have coped on his behalf many times. But the insistence he doesn't want our support anymore after we make noise about Epstein disclosure? Fuck him.

>>510740777
CHECKED
You are the 388th trip today on /pol/.


Please read my poem I wrote for you:

test


NEXT DIGITS:
Posts/minute: 76
Next dub: 7s
Next trip: 1m 7s
Next quad: 4m 4s
Next quint: 47m 57s
Next sext: 8h 6m
Next sept: 3d 9h
Next oct: 3d 9h
Next non: 409d 20h
Next dec: 5490d 15h

Highest digits in the last 24h on /pol/:
>>510666666 (6 digits)
>>510733333 (5 digits)
>>510688888 (5 digits)

this post is automated, just testing things. id: checkbot-shillomatic-407ee19f

>>510740461
>I don't know what else I can say here. The WSJ won't release the image. That should prove to anybody that it's bullshit. But people are fucking stupid. "I have a document and here's what it says. No you can't see it, only I can see it." That is ALWAYS a lie.
This is beyond obvious to anybody who isn't a paid shill. I believe you, OP.

>>510740652
Interdasting… Wonder if it could’ve been Bongino or perhaps a democrat who previously had access. That collection needs to be released but that’s probably never going to happen, imagine the goldmine it is. Anyone who knew Epstein well enough to contribute to a 50th birthday collaboration of birthday cards is definitely worth looking into.

>>510738011
I'm fairly certain Donald Barr frequently shows up in the flight logs, too. Not a stretch that an 81 year old man would send a "bawdy" birthday card with a naked woman drawn on it. Sounds like something my 94yo granddad would do desu.

>>510740524
>Trump is going to prison or dying of McDonald's disease.
Trump will be your President until President J.D. Vance is inaugurated on January 20th, 2029.

>>510740777
Checked… Yeah I feel the same way the way Trump has been wigging the fuck out over Epstein the last *two weeks* and talking shit about his supporters who backed him since 2015, even when he did some straight up retarded shit has really been a major let down.

>>510740652
The dialog in the letter includes "Trump" as reported.

>>510735353 (OP)
Cope you worthless faggot

>>510735606
draw a phony and leak that for lulz

>>510735353 (OP)
>WSJ Insider Here: Trump Epstein Letter is FAKE
>The letter itself is real. But the "Trump Epstein Letter" does not have TRUMP in it. It just says DONALD. And the signature does not match Donald Trump's. It was sent by some other person named "Donald."
>I have seen it. That's why the WSJ didn't release it. I can't leak this any other way without getting caught and fired.
>The signature doesn't match Trump's. DONALD BARR is who most likely wrote it, a writer and CIA agent and father of Attorney General William Barr.

>>510735353 (OP)
Can you provide hard evidence that it's any Donald other than DJT who was hanging around with Epstein when the letter was written? If you hear hooves in Montana, think horses, not zebras. You're reaching incredibly hard.

>>510741574
>The dialog in the letter includes "Trump" as reported.
False.

The name "Trump" is not in the letter. I've seen it. The signature is "Donald" with no last name (doesn't match Trump's). The name "Donald" with no last name is in the text. The name "Trump" is NOT in the letter, anywhere.

>>510735353 (OP)
As an aside, you seem extremely desperate. Here's a quick hypothetical: what if it is actually Trump? What does that say about the "movement" you spent the last ten years obsessing over? What does it say about the relationships you ended, the bridges you burned, the opportunities on which you missed out?

The answer to these questions is exactly why you're desperate. It is the sunk cost fallacy underlying a whole lot of MAGA right now. If you admit that Trump was the one who sent that letter, it means everything you've been -- maybe your entire identity -- for the last ten years has been in service of a lie and a grift. It means it all was for nothing. That's gotta be a hard truth to carry.

God help you.

>>510741984
>Can you provide hard evidence that it's any Donald other than DJT
Yes. The signature doesn't match. I saw it myself.

WSJ refuses to publish the letter because the "Donald" signature obviously doesn't match Donald Trump's.

>>510742269
>Here's a quick hypothetical: what if it is actually Trump?
It isn't Trump, but the letter itself isn't incriminating. If Trump had sent an identical letter, it wouldn't hurt him. But this is a dishonest smear by Murdoch RINO crowd. They want America flooded with illegal alien slaves and will do anything to hurt Trump to get that outcome.

>>510742329
No pictures of Donald Barr hanging out with Epstein in the 90s? No Donald Barr in the flight logs on the Lolita Express?

>>510742329
Got a copy of Donald Barr's signature?

>>510742472
Sure it is. It's just not criminally CONVICTING. There is a difference. We're not talking about whether or not DJT for sure, beyond a reasonable doubt, abused girls with Epstein. We're talking about how LIKELY it is, right?

But again, what if it is Trump? What does that mean for you?

>>510742602
Read the thread.

>>510742491
See >>510737373

>>510742777
Not seeing a picture of Donald Barr's signature. Are you sure you're actually operating in good faith here, or are you just spinning?

>>510742762
>But again, what if it is Trump?
Nothing in the letter is incriminating in any way. If Trump wrote it, which he didn't, it just shows he was a coozhound, which we already knew.

The issue is that he didn't send the letter and WSJ is trying to defame him.

>>510741984
The reason it’s plausible is because Barr’s dad was named Donald who literally gave Epstein his start and the secret shit could easily be cia/mossad connections and blackmail. Also I really don’t see Trump writing a supposed hypothetical conversation with coded language that some glownigger shit like how navy seals have pictures of secret missions they’ve completed using only random images and symbols but if you know the details of the mission it tells the entire story. Keep in mind Barr’s dad wrote weird sci-fi novels about underage orgies and trafficking which would tie into him writing such a letter.

>>510742865
I'm not typing the same responses 200 times for people too lazy to read the thread. I already addressed that above. This is my last reply to you.

>>510742974
I'm not asking for a response, fren. I'm asking for a copy of Donald Barr's signature.

>>510742898
you're fucking retarded. WSJ is not gonna permanently torch all their credibility and sign away tens of millions if not hundreds of millions of dollars in damages unless their evidence is rock solid. just stfu and go take your jewish cope to PTG or r/theZognald

>>510735353 (OP)
Yeah sure okay buddy

>>510742777
CHECKED
You are the 409th trip today on /pol/.


Please read my poem I wrote for you:

test


NEXT DIGITS:
Posts/minute: 74
Next dub: 4s
Next trip: 1m 8s
Next quad: 4m 8s
Next quint: 19m 10s
Next sext: 7h 50m
Next sept: 3d 11h
Next oct: 3d 11h
Next non: 421d 2h
Next dec: 5641d 17h

Highest digits in the last 24h on /pol/:
>>510666666 (6 digits)
>>510733333 (5 digits)
>>510688888 (5 digits)

this post is automated, just testing things. id: checkbot-shillomatic-a01a8c71

>>510736358
It won’t work

>>510735577
it's so obviously this

>>510742898
Ok but what if it's true? Let's run with the thought experiment. It's just a hypothetical, right? Where's the danger?

>>510742865
Dumbfaggot, OP said he doesn't have a copy of Donald Barr's signature. He didn't say he was sure the signature was Barr's. He just said he was sure it wasn't Trump's.

If the signatures matched, WSJ would have published a pic of the letter. So obviously they don't match.

Learn to read you faggot Jew.

>>510742491
Why would an old glownigger in his 70’s be rolling around to parties and taking plane trips with his old protege? Real glow niggers especially old ones don’t pose for pictures like celebrities do, they hate having their pictures being taken like mafia bosses.

>>510735353 (OP)
Of course the signature doesn't match Donald's he wrote a letter to his friend and made his name to resemble the pubic hair of a girl you fucking shill. He wasn't signing a fucking executive order. And for you to claim it is not him just because he signed Donald instead of "Donald Trump" proves to me you are full of shit as the best you can say is it doesn't prove it is him, not that it proves it ISN'T him. Obvious as fuck you're a damage control shill

>>510735577
>I think Trump created the letter.
If it was real, they'd publish a picture of it.

The signature doesn't match Trump's, so they won't publish it.

>>510743316
So... it's not Donald Barr at all then, or at least it's no likelier to be Donald Barr than any other Donald in America and we're back at the position where the ONLY Donald we know who was a friend of Epstein and plausibly able to share a "secret" with him is... DJT. It's really quite damning once you stop reacting and start actually thinking.

>>510743041
These media companies are caught repeatedly lying and get sued over and over again and they just tank the losses. Look at Trump's lawsuit against ABC.

>>510743349
>Of course the signature doesn't match Donald's
Thank you for admitting the letter is fake.

>>510742762
>what if it is Trump?
Doesn't matter and irrelevant after the 90s when Bill Clinton lied to Congress.
>What does that mean for you?
I find the entire thing hilarious. Democrats are going after character when voters want illegals gone and the economy fixed.

>>510735353 (OP)
pedo defender

>>510743349
>it wasn't god emperor trump
>it was this other guy named "donald"
>disregard the dozens of photographs of trump and epstein partying together
>disregard the video footage of trump and epstein partying together
>disregard the audio interview of epstein openly stating that he was best friends with trump
>disregard everything that isn't posted by trump on TROOTH SOCIAL
all kikes need to die

>>510743482
OP said the signature isn't Trump's and Donald Barr is the likely suspect, but not definitely him.

How fucking retarded are you that you can't figure that out?

>>510743399
That’s what I’ve been thinking of since yesterday when the story broke like oh everyone is describing this letter, where the fuck is the picture??? I genuinely wanted to see it and couldn’t find it anywhere and if it’s just a drawing then it’s not like publishing a naked lady.

>>510743631
>only one person has ever been named Donald
lol

Trump really has driven you people crazy.

>>510743041
That's pretty shitty logic. Media companies routinely lie and torch their credibility. It's been their MO for at least two decades.

>>510743041
msm has been lying for years about everything
only boomers still read or watch the news anyways so they can get away with it

>>510743646
You're not understanding my argument. If not DJT, then who? It's not enough to put forth flimsy evidence against exceptionally strong evidence in aggregate. We are at the point where you need to lay out an argument for someone to be MORE likely the Donald in said letter because, again, if you hear hooves in Montana, think horses. You're proposing zebras and you haven't even turned around to look at what's running.

>>510743702
how many other people named "donald" were best friends with epstein at that time as documented by dozens of photographs, video evidence and audio recordings in which epstein himself states he's best friends with trump...just kys, kike. a jewish pedophile scammed you and you're still coping about it 10 years later.

>>510735353 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BGfo4yiCc8
see first 8 minutes on the Epstein connection with Donald Barr
shit is crazy

>>510740558
>do the work to support my hypothesis
um, no

>>510735353 (OP)
How much is the Trump campaign paying you for this?

a thought OP, but you should probably start sleuthing for a copy of Barr's shlock sci-fi that happens to be signed

>>510743494
>>510743041
Here's another one. Corporate media is a complete embarrassment.

>>510743631
There were 7 or possibly 8 different people named Donald in Epstein's orbit per the various flight logs and other material disclosed so far in lawsuits and by DOJ.

Epstein was a networker. That was his intel game. He knew 8 different "Matt/Matthew"s, 4 different "George"s, and on and on.

>>510743832
>best friends with epstein
Repeating this lie doesn't make it true no matter how hard you try.

>>510735353 (OP)
Its definitely a ploy. Just trump's stuff comes out? Despite knowing all the actors? Seems like mos sad betrayed Trump and the orange nigger overreacted meaning some of it is probably true probably not the letter. Its a funny ploy burn everyone's dirt but the enemies'. Honesty is probably the best thing to do here as his reputation is already in the gutter, and then go after the rest of them in a vengeful riotous fury. That won't happen though. Ejections from congress will start happening this september if no others are implicated.

>>510735577
He isn't involved with this, but it was manufactured by some other party and leaked to various left wing rags until one took the bait and ran with the story. My gut says Baron was behind this.

>>510743797
>It's not enough to put forth flimsy evidence against exceptionally strong evidence
I saw the letter.

The signature is not Donald Trump's. If it was, WSJ would post a picture or scan of the letter. They won't, which proves that the signature isn't Trump's.

You want to go down the rabbit hole of "what other Donald signed it?" I think Donald Barr. Maybe somebody else. It wasn't Trump, and that's all that matters.

>>510744182
If you have his signature, please post it. I will tell you if it resembles what is in that letter.

>>510735353 (OP)
Thanks for dropping this on /pol/ for the "media" to find. Glownigger leaks. NOICE.

>>510735353 (OP)

Why the fuck don't they just release the letter? The way Trump is acting is setting off all kinds of sirens in my head, but the lack of any photo in the article made me feel something was fishy too. You might have a point anon. Though I'm doubtful an 81 year old a year before his death was fucking kids instead of someone actually recorded to actually have connections with him at the time. But also it seems a lot of Epstein's old friend and pals did send him letters too, so a guy like Barr is definitely suspectible.

Can someone mail the WSJ or something? I feel like they are hiding something. OP's POV adds up. I don't think WSJ is being truthful about this

>>510744039
OP didn't ask you to do work for him. He said he's never seen a Donald Barr signature and if you have one, post it. How is that "work"?

You fucking kikes will lie and mislead about anything.

>>510744900
>Why the fuck don't they just release the letter?
Because the signature doesn't match Trump's and people would know it was a lie.

>>510744705
Someone find Donald Barr's signature somehow please please.

Try searching old Dalton school records or some copies of his books, I'm searching for it

>>510744900
>OP's POV adds up. I don't think WSJ is being truthful about this
Yep. I think OP is legit. WSJ hiding the letter is clear proof that it doesn't support their claims. If it did they'd release it.

>>510745073
Or try analyzing the writing style

>>510735577
It was in the Ghislain Maxwell files.

>>510743797
More like WSJ gave you a transcript of horse noises and you are just blindly believing it without hearing the actual audio

>>510744983
why would i have donald barr's signature?

>>510744342
cope more faggot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VDK5ttnzz4

>>510745279
OP said "If you have Donald Barr's signature, please post it."

Do you know what "if" means?

>>510735353 (OP)
this is pee tape level of silliness. nobody will believe this except for the faggots that need to believe it lol

makes trump look smart now

Wow very believable post OP. Too bad you support a pedophile

>>510735353 (OP)

>>510735750
This
Proof or GTFO

>>510745428
>Wow very believable post OP.
Everything OP has posted tracks with what the Wall Street Journal has done. They won't release the letter. They're obviously scared of it.

And insiders have posted here before. We knew Epstein was dead before anybody else did.

>>510745579
Have you asked the Wall Street Journal for proof? They refuse to post a pic of the letter.

>>510744595
You don't think he could have just, like, written his signature differently?

>>510745487
>The Gayway Pundit
That's definitely not a publication that would cover for pedophilia

>>510742898
Dude, he signed his name in a way that mimicked pubic hair on the drawing he made. Of course it’s going to look a little different than his normal signature. Your hypothesis reeks of desperation.

>>510744595
These LARPs are so fucking gay, and you niggers wouldn't resort to this if you weren't desperate.

Source:
>McNickol (1991) "Handwriting analysis putting it to work for you"

And here's an example of him just signing "Donald", to get that cope out of the way.

Ok. release the file

>>510735353 (OP)
It’s amazing how Russbots always manage to reveal themselves with awkward phrasing. Their brains simply cannot into English.

>>510745991
We have no idea how he signed his name. WSJ still hasn't posted the actual letter.

For all we know all of it is fake.

>>510745732
OP is supposedly WSJ. We are currently asking OP. Has yet to provide any sort of hint of proof.

>>510746481
It's just spin and cope.

>>510746418
You couldn't even bother researching the story you're lying about, could you?

What I hate about MIGA is that you all think you're these brilliant, Roger Stone-style dirty-tricksters, capable of fooling the world, but you're all so bad it.

>>510745370
but if i had donald barr's signature, i would have already posted it.

>>510746639
Did posting that make you feel better about yourself?

>>510746639
>four seasons landscaping
gave me the clear pill

>>510736010
>>510737373
Weird.
https://www.cdc.gov/epstein-barr/about/index.html

>>510746895
This is really gay. You're doing the same thing as the original Q schizophrenic: you think you figured something out, and are pretending to be an insider so your dumb theory will be taken seriously.

It's clearly going to be Trump in this context, and the letter came from documents viewed by the DOJ in Ghislain's trial.

>>510747142
Proof we're living in a simulation

>>510735353 (OP)
Harm is beyond done, and the flip flopping made him look bad, to be honest, no one believes anything only the most loyal followers think it's some kind of 4d chess, he's either being blackmailed or just plain stupid.

Real WSJ insider. The letter is 100% real.

Trump still covers for jews that rape kids.

>>510747280
You haven't thought this through. Why didn't WSJ post a picture of the letter?

>>510735353 (OP)
yea no shit everything about epstein is fake
trump too

>>510747489
pretty sure he is a crypto J

MIGA!

>>510735353 (OP)
No way! The pic + text, made by some intelligence agency to counter the narrative and make the whole theme ridiculous is A FAKE? NOOOOO WAY!
of course it's fake. It's made to make the whole thing unbelievable and give the media a tool, so they can say: "look! It's fake. So why don't we just look at other things in the world. Forget about those files"

>>510747280
>This is really gay. You're doing the same thing as the original Q schizophrenic:
If the letter had a signature that matched Trump, we (WSJ) would have posted it.

This isn't Q bullshit. It's common sense.

>>510735353 (OP)
fake and gay insider post
>It just says DONALD
So? Sometimes Trump signs like this (picrel)

>>510746639
>What I hate about MIGA is that you all think you're these brilliant, Roger Stone-style dirty-tricksters, capable of fooling the world, but you're all so bad it.
You believe a mainstream media story that says what's in a document but they won't post the document.

Who is the retard here?

>>510748109
Then they should post a picture of the letter so we can confirm it's his signature.

Why didn't they post a picture?

>>510748109
The signature on the letter looks nothing like that. I've seen it.

>>510748179
>Why didn't they post a picture?
OP here. They didn't post a picture because the signature on the letter looks absolutely nothing like Trump's.

>>510748179
How the fuck should I know? I'm not some gay ass pretend WSJ insider.

I'm just pointing out that OP is full of shit.

I will say whatever you think of them WSJ has a whole ass legal team. They either have proof it's real or they know legally they can throw the article writer under the bus if it's not. If Trump follows through with his lawsuit then I guess we'll find out.

>>510748250
No you haven't you lying faggot.

You claim you can't post a picture because you're worried that the WSJ can subpoena 4chan but they can already do that based on your posts. If what you were saying was true they'd know you're a legit insider.

You're just a fucking troll.

>>510737373
>Donald Barr was an American educator, writer, and Office of Strategic Services officer. He was an administrator at Columbia University before serving as headmaster at the Dalton School in New York City and the Hackley School in Tarrytown, New York. He also wrote two science fiction novels. His sons are former United States Attorney General William Barr and physicist Stephen Barr.
why would this guy talk about having everything, like there's a voiceover and he's just chilling on jeffery's island watching the ocean?

>>510737027
as an actual, current teacher
>pink slip season: second week of March
>certificated (teacher/counselor) and classified (non-educator) hiring season: late April - late August
>admin hiring: late January - mid May
if your district is ass backwards, they delay hiring into the summer, but by then, all good hires are gone and you take the best of the leftovers. Most teachers are told they won’t be back by late February, second Friday of March at latest. Position fliers go out in late March or early April, depending on when your district’s spring break falls. Hiring takes about a month after the initial interview and acceptance as it has to go through district board meetings for approval, usually held at the start of the next month (unless there’s an emergency board meeting or pre-planned second meeting that month).

No admin is going to be hired into the summer, you want to get that immediately out of the way and give them some onboarding towards the end of the academic year. Most places, barring an emergency resignation, will aim to get a new admin hired before March so they can come in late April or early May to get some onboarding and familiarity with the staff, district expectations, and community. If admin does resign, they still take care of it immediately and will commonly hire someone from within if they are ready, like the vice principal, or will forgo a hiring and place someone the superintendent trusts as a interim admin until they hire the appropriate person

no one goes into the new school year with a vacancy unless they really fucked their recruitment over or the person they lined up backed out at the last minute

>>510735353 (OP)
My honest reaction

>>510735437
These kids nowadays... They don't OBEY.
>It's not over yet.

>>510748370
You should be asking the question why WSJ didn't post a picture of the letter. They even went as far as to describe things they say Trump drew on the letter, but they won't post a picture of it? Ask yourself why.

Newsflash:
Epstein is connected to Israel, this is why Trump is covering it up. He doesn't want to risk the political fallout for Israel when people realize all of Epstein's clients were blackmailed and used as Israeli assets (including Trump himself).

"The most concrete link is his relationship with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak. Epstein and Barak met numerous times between 2013 and 2017, with Barak visiting Epstein’s properties in Florida and New York approximately 30 times, including a 2014 private flight in Florida. Barak received $2.3 million from an Epstein-associated foundation between 2004 and 2006, and Epstein invested $1 million in a limited partnership established by Barak in 2015.

Another connection stems from Epstein’s ties to Ghislaine Maxwell, whose father, Robert Maxwell, was a British media mogul alleged to have had links to the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad. Some sources, including former Israeli intelligence officer Ari Ben-Menashe, have claimed Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell ran a “honey-trap” operation for Mossad to blackmail influential figures. A lawsuit by a woman identified as Jane Doe 200 alleged Epstein boasted of being a Mossad agent, but this remains unconfirmed.

Epstein was also associated with the Wexner Foundation, which supports Jewish leadership and has ties to Israel. His financial backer, Leslie Wexner, was a member of the “Mega Group,” a collection of Jewish philanthropists, which some, like former NSA counterspy John Schindler, have speculated was linked to Israeli intelligence operations, though no hard evidence supports this. Epstein reportedly invested in an Israeli startup, Reporty Homeland Security (later rebranded as Carbyne), connected to Israel’s defense industry, further fueling speculation."

Epstein is a jew who raped white girls and got other guys to rape white girls so he could blackmail them and use them as Israeli assets.

>>510748457
>You claim you can't post a picture because you're worried that the WSJ can subpoena 4chan but they can already do that based on your posts.
Yep. And if they do they'll get an IP that corresponds to a New York Internet cafe about six blocks from 1211 Avenue of the Americas where WSJ is (mostly) located. They won't be able to find me.

>>510748680
So they can publish it in a few days and get ten times the number of clicks they just got.

>>510749120
>google maps
post the pic of WSJ item and date then if you're unafraid now

>>510749313
They will never publish it because it would reveal it's fake. Now they're just getting sued by Trump and even less hits because there's no picture at all.

>>510749506
>they won't do it
Enjoy this cope while it lasts.
>getting sued
Like that guy who claimed Trump wears diapers and shit himself repeatedly during The Apprentice? Threatening to sue and actually filing it are different things.

>>510749390
I'm not posting anything that can be tracked back to me. If the WSJ actually thought the signature on the letter looked like Trump's, THEY'D POST IT YOU DUMB FUCK.

>>510749687
OP here. They will never post the actual letter. The signature looks nothing like Trump's. It would give away the lie.

>>510735353 (OP)
What does Weakly Shounen Jump have to do with this?

>>510749718
>They won't be able to find me.
>B-but they'll find me!!
oof the flip flopping.. confirmed LARP. thanks for the fun OP :)

>>510749687
More like this: >>510743494

>>510748851
>Newsflash:
>Epstein is connected to Israel, this is why Trump is covering it up
You guys never learn, so you? Why create an Israel narrative when there is MORE THAN ENOUGH evidence to suggest impropriety on Trump's personal behalf? Take a step back and look at the evidence. He was personally involved.

>>510749966
Because I like certain things Trump is doing, like removing non-whites but hate that he supports Israel because Israel is behind most of the world's problems.

>>510749915
Some idiot slipping up by saying something close to the truth, but more outrageous, while live on air is nothing like this. Multiple members of an organization would have had oversight on this under consultation from their fucking legal team. They collectively chose to publish an article like this. Trump will not sue them.

>>510735353 (OP)
MAGA shills reaching levels of desperation I’ve never seen before kek

>>510745254
It was.

>>510748675
obey brand is probably considered high fashion in huehue nigger monkey land

>>510750236
So... you don't actually care? You wrote all of that in support of a literal fantasy based on your values instead of what's happening in material reality?

>>510749966
Fuck off kike

> In 2015, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that Epstein invested in the startup Reporty Homeland Security (rebranded as Carbyne in 2018).[84][85][86] The startup was connected with Israel's defense industry. It was headed by former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, who was also at one time the defense minister, and chief of staff of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). The CEO of the company is Amir Elihai, a special forces officer, and Pinchas Bukhris, a director of the company and former defense ministry director general and commander of IDF cyber unit 8200.[87] Epstein and Barak, the head of Carbyne, were close, and Epstein often offered him lodging at one of his apartment units at 301 East 66th Street in Manhattan.[88][89] Epstein had past experience with Israel's research and military sector.[90] In April 2008, he went to Israel and met with a number of research scientists and visited different Israeli military bases.[90]

>>510750453
No. I just see Israel as the source of most problems in society and the Epstein debacle is just another example of that.

Why attack Trump for bad behavior when the source of the bad behavior is Israel?

Go for the source.

Why do you protect the worst group of people (jews) but attack Trump?

Focus your energy on the source of all problems, jews.

>>510740461
What timeframe was this letter sent?
Trump's signature/style has changed through the years.

>>510735437
This Anon says the right thing at the right time. Listen to Anon.

>>510750274
He will and he will win, just like this: >>510744227

>>510750657
2003

>>510735437
I lol’d

>>510749911
They can't find me based on my posts thus far. Not posting anything that would allow me to be identified. Fuck you.

>>510750274
Yeah, because Trump totally haded sued and won against other news orgs doing the same kind of shady shit.

>>510750352
WSJ won't post the document. That's all any person with a brain needs to know that the doc isn't legitimate.

>>510740558
Post the fucking letter or gtfo.

>>510750274
Don't count on anyone being smart. As it applies to your comment, during the so-called Killian Memo Scandal, CBS broadcast a story they knew was fake, and their legal department OK'd it before the broadcast.

What happens is that people want to hear things they want to hear. And if they come across a story that's too good to be true, they want so much for it to be true that they're willing to believe it beyond all reason and their usual legal caution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killian_documents_controversy

What's probably going to hurt WSJ the most is that their presentation of the story contained paragraphs embellishing, for example, attempting to read the mind of Trump, then publishing that guess as fact.

Either way, unless they have trumps fingerprints on the letter, they are going to be in a world of legal shit.

>>510749718
Why don’t you, I dunno, make a mock-up or a drawing of what you saw? You can do that much, can’t you? Can you at least draw what it looked like?

>>510751231
>Post the fucking letter or gtfo.
I think you meant to send this to the Wall Street Journal. They're the ones hiding what's in it. I'm just a proofreader.

>>510750826
>just like this
That wasn't Trump.
>>510750966
Trump isn't going to. The same as those claims about him shitting himself. There was never a lawsuit.
>>510751307
>people want to hear things they want to hear. And if they come across a story that's too good to be true, they want so much for it to be true that they're willing to believe it beyond all reason
The same is true for coming across a story that they don't want to be true. The cope will flow like the Nile.

>>510735353 (OP)
Has to be Barr, what a sick fuck....
Amazon Review of Donald Barr's novel "I have a copy of this book. It is a really badly written book whose only excuse seems to be to refer to human trafficking and sex slavery either as an appeal to prurient interests - in which case it fails, or to relate reminiscences in fiction, or possibly as a payoff, because the dialogue and connecting thoughts are lacking, as well as any real plot even after half the book is read.

The writer seems to like putting everything in terms of girls, and boys, and children, even when the scenes do not necessarily (but often do) involve kids. So while for instance the 14 year old girl getting raped in the first few chapters is really supposed to be 14, the hero of the book in danger of being sodomized - 'bend down kid and make it good' (sic) is not supposed to be a kid. It is that way throughout the book. They are either labeled like they are children (the queen was a 'child'), or actually boys or girls. So it pretty much starts with the word "naked" and goes down from there.

It is pretty shocking a headmaster of a school would write this junk. It's not the only low grade sf story out there with this non-writing in it - but they are always bad reads. exploitation novel at best, says something about the writer regardless."

>>510751365
Obviously he doesn’t draw anon, for fuck sakes what are we talking about here!

>>510751774
No, I’m speaking directly to you! If you don’t have the fucking evidence then gtfo. Stop wasting our fucking time.

>>510751774
>This is bullshit
…Bit I believe it

>>510747142
>>510747314
>COINCIDENCE, CONSPIRACY, HAPPENINGS, THE SIMULATION
Could just be that people that know each other now are more likely to have had ancestors knowing each other back then?

Or that by taking two random Jewish surnames, there is quite a relatively high chance to get the same couple of Jewish surname when picking them randomly another time?

How is this so difficult to grasp for you?

>>510751817
> The same is true for coming across a story that they don't want to be true. The cope will flow like the Nile.
True. No one knows for sure (yet) what is true and what isn't. We guess that it will be one of two:
> Trumps is lying, it is real, opening up more Epstein
> Trump is telling the truth, the WSJ loses about $500 million in the settlement, but >$1 billion in their lost credibility with the brokerage houses

I'm still unsure. On the one hand, Trump is just enough of a sexual deviant to have done it; but the WSJ has already been party of the whole lying media cabal. I guess I'll have to wait and see what evidence comes out during discovery.

>>510752421
And flashback to the time another venerable old name, the Washington Post, decided that anyone Harris decided to pick for VP would be the "perfect choice".

You can't live on reputation alone; which is something a lot of old media is learning the hard way

>>510749966
A better question to ask is why blame Trump when you should be blaming Israel.

>>510752421
No one is sure, but I can't see the WSJ committing Sudoku in slow motion. You can't lie if you don't exist.Trump isn't some nobody they can tank the hit from, and this wasn't a case of slipping up and saying something wrong that was close to the truth, but worse.

>>510736010
So now that you hate trump so much youve moved on to defending known, self professed pedo, donald barr? Good god polcels make me sick. Theyre all so retarded. You can hate two people at once dumbass, trust me, i do it all day.

>>510752583
The first result I get on Google says that TK thing was fake, but I don't know for certain.

>>510752715
You're thinking of the old Wall Street Journal. Yes, the old WSJ would never knowingly publish anything they knew not to be true; if not for legal sake for honor sake. But remember that WSJ was sold in 2007.

Prior to this week, a lot of people were questioning the changed which had come to WSJ after the takeover. Everyone will forget them this week, but there were questions up until this week:

https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2011/07/20/wall-street-journal-under-rupert-murdoch/

>>510752954
no, what happened is that the reporter was preparing an article in advance, which would be her story after Harris announced her running mate; something which was going to happen (I think) about a week later.

It was her draft copy, but it accidently got transferred to the live web. them calling it 'fake' is them saying 'it's fake because it's not the final article I put out'; which bypasses the obvious problem that they had started with an editorial decision (the pick is perfect), before the facts (knowing who it was)

Back on the wanting it to be true, reminds me of this one, where two women wearing the same dress have different meanings, to the same author, one week apart

>>510738011
Barr and epstein were known associates, good friends even. Barr also wrote weird slop sci fi about fucking lids and how good of a thing it is. I dont think its a stretch to say its him who wrote the letter. Pedophile writer/handler writes pedophile poetry to his pedophile friend. You stupid fuck

>>510753222
I understand the premise. The first result says it never happened. Nothing immediately came up to support that it did.

>>510752421
Business side of WSJ won’t be affected because it’s well known they have a political division just like their editorial board doesn’t reflect on their business division. Like vanity fair who’s political wing doesn’t affect their fashion stuff.

>>510743041
Lmfao media is constantly lying how fucking young are you? There are decade old compilations of CNN straight up faking scenarios on sets and lying straight to viewers faces to the point where theyve had to issue apologies. Guess what? They’re still around. You fucking idiot. Hatred for Trump, whether justified or not, is turning this board even more brown and retarded than it already was. No critical thinking skills. None.

>>510752715
>Lmfao now the media is super respectable and would never lie for viewership so you should believe everything they say.
Pick a side you fucking marble brain

>>510735606
>They don't want it leaked because the DONALD signature doesn't match Trump's.
why the fuck did they say it was trump's letter then

Obvious shill damage control red herring thread. No insider would be so dedicated to saying it is NOT Trump, they would say the signature could be Trump's or Barr's we don't know for sure since last name isn't there and they wrote their signature retarded to look like pubic hair
>It can't be Trump he always signs with his last name!!!
Bullshit there are pics of Trump signing just with "Donald" so go fucl yourself

>>510753697
I didn't say they were respectable, retard. I said they don't want to slowly kill themselves in front of everyone.You can't lie when you are dead.

>>510753753

>>510753531
> guess what, they're still around.
Ya, CNN is doing so well they had to be gobbled up by AT&T; and now are in the process of being unloaded to anyone sucker enough to buy them:
https://www.businessinsider.com/warner-bros-discovery-cable-tv-sale-cnn-why-explained-2025-6

>>510753878
kek'd to myself at the thought...
> what if the card was signed by autopen

>>510754065
Guess what? Theyre still around retard. Everyones aware cnn has been shit forever now, thats not an epiphany. My point stands. Youre 12 and probably brown

>>510753798
Why would this slowly kill them? Media has been lying forever. No one gives a shit. Im not even totally convinced trump DIDNT write this im just baffled by the unending stupidity on this shithole site. You morons flip flop like its your job, its so emotional and womanly

>>510754317
Trump isn't some nobody and this isn't a minor screw up of phrasing while live on air. If Trump actually sued them and won they would be put out of business.

>>510735353 (OP)
Oh you mean the same Barr that was apppointed by Trump to help bury this because his father was compromised?

Wow really digging it deeper here.
Sounds like Trump was always held back in life from being compromised as well as lots of others so he came up with a plan to free all the elites from their crimes and cover it all up.

>>510754317
No one gave a shit before because there was no independent outlet in which to share the media lies to the masses.

So, in the early 1900's, everyone may have thought Hearst was an SOB, but there was no one to print it, so the message didn't spread.

These times are the first in history when it is possible to fact check the media in real time. As more of the population learn that the so-called establishment media are no no more than glorified bloggers fighting over the same audience as streamers; the cash flow of the bloated media companies suddenly causes them to go bust.

So, just as a Chinese factor can produce shoes at a price to put american footwear out of business; so too can a streamer living on diet coke and pizza beat a company with a billon dollar headquarters, and aged out-of-touch podcasters earning $20 million per year.

>>510754439
meanwhile, murdoch is a naturalized US citizen. Which means if it's proven that he knowingly published something that was proven false; there is a >0% chance of his losing his US citizenship, and all of the advantages he has played it for

>>510736010
>>510736010
Wikipedia says otherwise.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Barr

>>510743934
wow. It's 100% amazing, and 100% there is a rabbi at the bottom of this rabbit hole as well.

let's pester and taunt the wsj for the letter

>>510735353 (OP)
As someone whose father works at Nintendo, I confirm this post to be 100% true.

yo based wapo insider
give us any other inside about epstein shit
any other stories?

BUMP

>>510750960
you've already given enough away that it would take about even some dumb fuck in HR about a day, two at most, to identify you. take your larp elsewhere faggot. i bet you're also the retard who overplays your hand larping as the trump insider

>>510735353 (OP)
It's all irrelevant. MAGA + independents put Trump in office a second time knowing that he used to be Epstein's literal bestie. I don't care which kiddie fucker is in office as much as I care about how many illegals are being ushered into the country. Also, didn't want a niggerjeet woman as president. A Jeetboon if you will. It's as simple as that.

Also, obviously Trump isn't in "the files" otherwise he wouldn't have campaigned on releasing them. Our Greatest Ally has him by the balls on this one, obviously.

>>510735353 (OP)
Then why would the exchange say “Donald” and “Trump”?

«Voice Over: There must be more to life than having everything," the note began.
Donald: Yes, there is, but I won't tell you what it is.
Jeffrey: Nor will I, since I also know what it is.
Donald: We have certain things in common, Jeffrey.
Jeffrey: Yes, we do, come to think of it.
Donald: Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?
Jeffrey: As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you.
Trump: A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.

Stupid faggot

>>510752715
Leaf can't stop coping

>>510758775
he's a larping kike faggot who didn't read his instructions before shooting off his dick holster. no shekels for chaim today, oy veyyyy

>>510743797
i just have to tell u how much of a unbelievable subhuman u are
the amount of bad faith arguments you've put forth is pathetic
u should kill urself pronto

>>510758775
Who cares? Trump was Epstein's best friend for over a decade and WE ALL STILL VOTED FOR HIM.

This isn't the time to get moralistic about the pedo-ZOG. Maybe in the next election.

>>510758913
kys pedo

>>510736358
Agreed, this is truth. He'd also better watch his back. He's now in danger

>>510758775
"wtf they swapped out donald into trump at the end that must mean it's trump!"
are u serious
>>510758906
"wow great point!"
lol really
i can't believe how subhuman u all are
hey watch this
>random australian guy: i'm a faggot
>random australian guy, id SSKRQ/KN: i suck dicks
wtf it has the id to clarify guess it's accurate

>>510735353 (OP)
>insider here thread
>no proof posted
>retards bump it anyways

>>510737546
You're doxxing yourself
Do not add details like this

>>510759073
sheep shagger how's ur STD

>>510758775
That makes even less sense. Why would they switch between "Donald" and "Trump"? This shit is so fake.

>>510759159
>schizo rambling
>muh hidden messages in IDs
>dick sucking
>delusional cope
kek whatever faggot.

>>510735606
>Donald Barr wrote the letter
>Letter from 2003
>Donald Barr died in 2005
Sure larp faggot

>>510735521
I was insider.
Then she leaked

>>510759509
Have you read Trump's twitter? This is exactly how he writes. Weird emphasis and everything

>>510760007
No he doesn't. He's never written anything like that ever before. It sounds like a fucking theater script.

This thread stinks like competence-crisis glownigger cope

>>510760591
And How the fuck would you know what he’s written before, dumb fuck?

>>510760591
Was Trump Epstein's best friend though? When did you find out that he was? And how did that affect your voting patterns?

>>510760707
>>510760858
Try to stay on topic you mongoloids

I PERSONALLY SAW BARR

I WAS THERE