I am ONCE AGAIN asking /pol/ to explain to me, a non american why the confederates were "bad" or any worse than the founding fathers of america?
> in 1776 slave owning, traitorous aristocrats secede from their home nation and decide to create their own nation
>this is seen as good, is celebrated, and is seen as a truimph for freedom and democracy
>in 1861 slave owning, traitorous aristocrats secede from their home nation and decide to create their own nation
>this is seen as the worst thing ever
Why is it like this? I still haven't received a coherent explanation as to why slave owning aristocrats fighting against their mother country is good in one scenario but bad in another
>inb4 the american revolutionaries fought for freedom
the american whigs fought against their government because they weren't allowed to genocide red indians and because catholics in quebec were given equal rights. They were whigs of the 18th century not the hippy dippy liberals that post 1960 america has tried to portray them as. the confederates were just continuing on with that radical whig tradition of self governance
>y-you're a southerner
i'm british
I agree with both the revolutions of 1776 and 1861

>b-but the founding fathers didn't fight for slavery
YES THEY DID YOU SPASTIC
Lord Dunmore's proclamation that enslaved blacks who fought for britain would be freed is what led a huge number of southerners to fight for the revolutionary cause
Ergo the american revolutionaries of 1776 fought for slavery
And the americans also fought to expand past the appalachians, ensuring the racial genocide of the red man.
Why is slavery worse than manifest destiny genocide? I agree with both, by the way

>>510743709 (OP)
Outwardly they were right, but historically they were financed by the bongs to stir up another french revolution for a massive landgrab.

>expects a good response from /pol/
>also asks americans

Confederates were 100% Democrats. Modern Democrats hate on Confederate Democrats to have something to hate. Confederate Democrats voted in many of the leaders of modern Democrats. Democrats create hatred then profit from it in continuous cycles. It makes sense to them.

>>510743709 (OP)
Anon, you are missing the point.
The confederates wanted to secede. The jews can't allow a divided state, because as you see till this day, how useful has america been to them.
And if they seceded, the world wouldn'r have been what you know today. It would have not been the way the kikes want it to be like now.

>>510743709 (OP)
You don't understand the levels of propaganda against the confederacy in American public school. Even Hitler gets a better rap. At least with Hitler they admit that he got the economy going and Germany was in an abusive peace treaty from WW1.

The only thing that's sympathetic to the South in American public schools is that they admit burnin' Sherman's march to the sea actually happened. Everything else paints them as unreasonable belligerents.