So you don't believe in climate change, eh?

Why is it that banks saying things like, "we are now expecting a 3 degree celsius world"?
>https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/big-banks-quietly-prepare-for-catastrophic-climate-change/

Why is it deniers can't explain increasing global temperatures? Some will say it's the sun, but they can't produce any models or predictions of just how much the sun will raise temperatures over the near term or the long term. Where are the hard predictions by deniers over the past 10-20 years? Why not hold them to account?

Deniers also claim scientists are just after the money, yet they refuse to acknowledge that such an accusation would apply just as much -- if not more -- to oil and gas corporations that are legally obligated to try to make a profit.

In short the climate is warming, and CO2 and methane are responsible for that warming, and the warming that is yet to come. Everyone accepts it except shills and schizos.

>>510763346 (OP)
lies

>inb4 it's the heat island effect
The arctic is warming faster than anywhere else, and oceans are also warming

>>510763406
what part is a lie?

>jaime pull up that photo of Ellis Island from 1940 that shows the same water level as today.

>>510763603
>a photo taken at a random time (low, middle, high tide) on the ocean clearly shows how much high tide has changed
kys idiot

>>510763681
It's about 3mm per year. A foot per century. And it's not accelerating. Just don't build your house at sea level, and you'll be fine.

>>510763346 (OP)
i believe it but ill not pay your gay carbon tax, green movement and policies are retarded.. getting hot?? move to siberia

>>510763346 (OP)
Tard brains will look at this chart and say "I see no reason why this should cause any problems to the most delicate ecosystem in this or any other nearby galaxy."

>>510763681
https://youtu.be/Q9w6pXmU8zY?si=BCH77teShixvGXaJ
Watch that, then you can go fuck yourself using your carbon credits.
Nothing we do here will change what happens in india/other shit holes

>>510763681
The high tide mark is an integral measurement in nautical surveying. Many laws are dependent on the high tide mark. Given how important the high tide mark is, we would expect that the marks would have been extensively reviewed to update any increases in the high tide. This would be a matter of great urgency given how important the high tide marks are for surveying, building permitting, and law enforcement. So why don't you provide us with evidence of recent high tide mark revision?

>>510763346 (OP)
>the sea has risen by over a foot in 100 years
Complete and total bullshit.

>>510766001
>crops out millions of years of historical data

You're literally just a bunch of bullshit artists working as pawns for communists. You should be ashamed.

>>510766001
How did they measure the CO2 concentration in the year 0? 275 ppm equals 0.0275%. It's so unbelievably little that the modern instruments that can measure that have only been available for less than half a century. But add to that the fact that geologically we are living in an era where CO2 is at a minimum. Go back in time and look at it. I'm too lazy to get the graphs, but the CO2 concentration has been a 100 times more in the distant past. We actually have the danger right now that should we get another ice age (when CO2 drops sharply because it gets absorbed more heavily in water due to lower temperatures) then plants and trees may not survive and we will all die. Do you know who's been saying that for the last 16 years or so? One of the founders of Greenpeace. Please don't believe me and look it up.

>>510763539
the part about the global temperatures increasing as a result of humans burning hydrocarbons. can you show statistical evidence that proves it’s human activity that’s causing a temperature increase? i want to see your math showing causation. the best statisticians in the world were asked to show how carbon dioxide released by humans is causing a temperature increase and they found nothing, so maybe you can be the first to prove it

>>510767190
They drill down hundreds of meters into Ice in Antarctica, the ice has built up over centuries so you can drill down to a certain distance to get Ice from roughly X year AD for example going all the way back to 12,000 AD if I remember correctly.

Anyways said Ice has air bubbles trapped in this, by drilling down and capturing the trapped air inside this Ice they can measure historical air samples from any period in the last 14,000 years.

>>510766706
And what followed a massive spike in co2 like this historically? All of the 5 massive extinction events lol

>>510769029
The first mass extinction was caused by cyanobacteria getting rid of the carbon dioxide.
Also there are war more than five.