Now what we make of that is an entirely different story. You have at least 11 possibilities and only 1 would imply pedo.

Opinion 1: Because he's on the list for legal age hookers.

Opinion 2: Because he's on the list for underage women.

Opinion 3: Because he's on the list for actual children.

Opinion 4: Because somebody else important to him is.

Opinion 5: 10-D chess move.

Opinion 6: Because he's afraid of what may happen to America in a full blown deepstate sabotage scenario.

Opinion 7: Because the list has been altered by political enemies and can no longer be discerned from the original one.

Opinion 8: Because he's gone insane.

Opinion 9: Because the list was a well-crafted hoax all along.

Opinion 10: Because he's afraid for his life and his loved ones'.

Opinion 11: Because he does not honestly believe it's such a big deal.

Which one does /pol/ think it is?

>>510783134 (OP)
There really only is two possibilities

1-he's on the list as a pedo (anything else wouldn't matter, everyone already knows he's a rapist and it hasn't affected him politically so far, pedo might be just a bit too much, even for maga cultists)
2-the list is about people so powerful even he risks his life by publishing it.

>>510784455
>pedo might be just a bit too much, even for maga cultists

Would definitely be the ultimate stab in the back for Q followers

It's 10 on this list >>510783134 (OP)
It's 2 on this list >>510784455
I'm shocked that all the talking heads aren't mentioning the fact that it's most likely he and the Indian chap and Pam etc have been threatened.
I now think to myself 'were we really so naive that we thought the release of all the damning evidence against the most powerful people in the world would just be allowed to happen?'