Why have the Jews gatekept access to prime teen pussy while demonizing anyone who dares let their primal urges take over?

Almost got the satanic trips

>>510799665 (OP)
fuck off glownigger, every thread is you fucking weirdos trying to change to overton window. Trump and his pals are fucking creeps

>>510799665 (OP)
>hebephilia
Anyone that uses cope terms to justify pedophilia is a kike.

>>510800072
Cope. The truth about everything is coming out. I told you faggots this would happen, I predicted it all. Once people start realising the lies about the (((AoC))) there's no going back.

It still smell like piss. It sick. It piss little bro

>>510799665 (OP)
Destroying pure beautiful women before they have the mental capacity to know right from wrong?
Nothing wrong with that if you are a Republican I guess.

>>510799665 (OP)
>teen
Too old, 6-10 is peak
I am a lolicon
I am a true lolicon
My strikezone for women lies between seven and twelve years old
I could go lower but never higher
I only view elementary school girls as the opposite sex
Good grief elementary schoolers are the best

miga is truly not sending their best

>>510799665 (OP)
Let me solve the crisis of Western civilization for you:
> early marriage for girls
> pederasty for boys 12+

Here's what you get for this
> marriage for all, strong families, and high reproduction rates
> an extra layer of care for young males who are statistically the hardest to tame and guide to productive outlets

>>510800126
>don't use da cope werds!
>says 'kike'
lmao cant make dis shit up

>>510799777
ironic

>>510800486
There's nothing wrong with desiring very young children. The problem is what you do with it.
Male daycare workers solve the problem by having sex with 100+ babies. But what use is that? What does society get in exchange for letting a dude cumming on 100 babies? Nothing. So that's why we don't want it or need it.
You have to think about pedophilia in terms of its function and potential benefits, and shape it around those goals.
Youth marriage is functional because 14 year old girls are pubescent and can have children.
Pederasty is functional because pubescent males are hard to handle and we need men to take an interest in and care for them, and share resources with them. Such labor does not come for free.

>>510800486
>israeli flag
>raging talmudic pedophile
Checks out.

The girl in the OP pic is Giselle Alvarinas

>>510800276
Well this is a jeet if I have ever saw one

This thread is so fucking brown you could plant an apple tree in it.

>>510799665 (OP)
So they can offer it on their private islands and use it for blackmail, since they made it illegal.

>>510799665 (OP)
This thread glows
>>510800126
Even posters here look disingenuous

>>510799777
>>510800743
Instead of thinking seriously about human nature, you seek divine intervention of a de facto random number generator.
> 665
> my delusions were almost corroborated

>>510799665 (OP)
How else are (((they))) gonna blackmail politicians without it? Theyre probably gonna raise the aoc to 25 to make it even easier.

>>510799665 (OP)
>hebephilia
Attraction to Big Khazar Milkers?

>>510800976
> glows
The only thing glowing is children, which is why we're attracted to them.

>>510801180
Oh my heck you’re telling me men don’t prefer the old wrinkly woman in the right over the young teen on the left??

>>510800301
A fully grown woman doesn't know right from wrong. Women are children

Don't lie. Every one of you would fuck this prime fertile teen given the chance.

>>510801309
It's normal for men to be attracted to youth.
There's nothing wrong with being attracted to or at least indulging an older woman.
There's also nothing wrong with being attracted to actual children. It's all what you do with it.
If we could cross that Rubicon, society would be much more sane.

Is it hebephilia, or is it normalcy?

You are literally gay or mentally ill if you would say no to this.

>>510801562
CP is banned because they don't want you to know this 14 year old fucks. They want you to remain gaslit about human nature, especially your own desires, which they paint as absolute evil.
The main point is to destroy your self esteem, rendering you politically immobile and weak, so women can dominate you.
It has nothing to do with sex with a 14 year old being wrong.

>>510801722

>>510799665 (OP)
if they have babies young, they won't displace men and drive wages down by taking the real jobs

>>510801794
Don't overdo it. You'll just get this thread nuked.

>>510801728
I agree. Society is completely backwards. Look at her. She wants it and she knows you know. But societal norms have been warped to suppress and demonize those feelings that come naturally.

>>510800301
>before they have the mental capacity to know right from wrong?
Anon, literally the only way a woman ever get that capacity is after motherhood.
Childless women are still mentally children even at 90+.

>>510801842
It's pretty clear we're ruled by secret policies that serve the economic interests of the billionaire class.
> brainwash women into hating motherhood and homemaking so the labor market is flooded by women, suppressing wages and increasing profits
> when women don't reproduce, import browns who work under the table, suppressing wages and increasing profits
The two biggest problems facing the West today are intertwined.
Both can be solved by marrying girls before 18, preferably before 16:
> strong families and higher reproduction rates
> labor market benefits workers, not billionaires, so browns can stay home

>>510801857
They'll nuke it either way. Jannies are probably just waiting for me to post more.

>>510802066
Checked, but if you pause, more anons might see the thread. Let it simmer.

>>510801878
>But societal norms have been warped to suppress and demonize those feelings that come naturally.
If society stopped demonizing your "feelings" but still disallowed you from having sex with underage girls, would that soothe your seethe?

There has been a war on men for a lomg time now, the average man is just not allowed to be happy or seek happiness. He has to conform to (((society))). Would be cool if the Don said fuck it lowers the (((AOC))). And b4 ooooooouuu pedo! No brainwashed blue pilled faggots, you can have to ugly old fat pigs with tattoos, not my cup of tea. I prefer someone young and pretty, like god intended. (((Feminism))) was a mistake, saving the jews from Hitler was a mistake and we are all paying for it now.

>>510802111
Trips checked and alright, I'll leave it with this one for now.

>>510800607
Europe needs to reintroduce cousin marriage.

>>510801562
>>510801651
Look how much she work for that eternal mirror

>>510801728
>>510801878
Does everyone have amnesia from when they where teenagers?
When I 12-13 the girls ran around fucking and sucking.
14-15 year olds dating 24 year olds.

Women are whores, just accept it.

>>510802398
>When I 12-13 the girls ran around fucking and sucking.
What bearing does this have on whether or not you should be allowed to diddle them now that you're a failed adult?

>>510801728
Giga jewish post, like the '68 arguments again but this time with pedophilia instead than "sexual liberation"

A lot of hebe fetishists on this website lately. What happened?

lmao what the hell since when did /pol/ have pedo threads?

>>510799665 (OP)
>>510801562
>>510801651
>>510802066
>>510802198
she's 16 in those pics. literally legal for any 18+ to have sex with her in almost all european countries, canada and some us states.

>>510802472
>hebe fetishists
This isn't an actual thing that exists except in the minds of people afflicted with your normosexual paraphilia.

>>510802449
Did you actually read the second half of his post you dumb gypsynigger?

>>510802174
You don't just demonize people's feelings. You destroy people's lives. You deny fundamental rights. You send Swat teams in to confiscate old magazines. You push people to commit suicide.
You elect a lunatic into office because he's going to pull back the veil on a vast Satanic pedophile conspiracy, and then turn on him when he doesn't release the Epstein files.
Anti pedophile hysteria is tearing America apart. You can't distinguish between MAGA Pizzagaters and feminists, the left or the right, DNC or RNC. They're all chanting the same lines, practically from the same book, like they're in a cult.

Wouldn't it be useful to maybe return to reality?

It's not about soothing our feelings. It's about living in a rational society, one that isn't self-destructing in a hare brained attempt to fulfill some prophecy feminists and far right Christians cooked up in the 1980s. It's about dealing with things in a practical way.

Or make more enemies, believe more lies, conjure up more conspiracy theories, topple more power brokers, all in some vain search for a truth that is staring you right in the face, which is that
> desire for youth is normal
> youth are sexual
That's the foundation for rationality on this topic. From there, you can go in any number of directions. I'm not in favor of liberation. That's why I propose youth marriage and pederasty, which are institutional.
But we know how feminists feel about institutions:
> TEAR THEM DOWN
That's how we got to this point.

>>510802523
She's younger in some of them but legal in all of them (Argentina).

>>510802449
>What bearing does this have on whether or not you should be allowed to diddle them now that you're a failed adult?
You guys try to portray females as pure, they are not.
Their nature is whoredom.

The sexes should be segregated in school. Women should be betrothed, so they do not go and lay with any man they see.

I don't care what the age of the man is, nor the woman.
If their are both fertile (went through puberty) then they can do whatever they want.
The only thing that matters is that the father of the woman agrees. Why would a father not give his daughter to a respectable man?
This is how the world worked.

>>510802677
>You don't just demonize people's feelings. You ...
You're having an obvious psychotic episode. Not reading the rest of your post. Take your meds right now.

>>510800813
Kill yourself newfag

>>510801584
That gypsy whore isn't her, stop spreading the lie that it is

>>510802677
That evil scumbag should not be anywhere near a loli
Kill yourself

I'm in my late 20s, I can't fuck 16/17 year olds anymore.

>>510802728
>The only thing that matters is that the father of the woman agrees.
So if you diddle some teen whose dad did not consent to it, what punishment do you get?

>>510799665 (OP)
14 year old girls having sex with older dudes they know and get horny for is a tale as old as time. Grooming them into a secret service's prostitution blackmail network to fuck unknown politicians in an island where they're trapped in isn't.

>>510802808
Who says you can't?

>>510802872
>14 year old girls having sex with older dudes they know and get horny for is a tale as old as time
Getting severely punished for that is also a story as old as time.

>>510802825
>So if you diddle some teen whose dad did not consent to it, what punishment do you get?
Treat it as destruction of property.
Either he can compensate me and maybe prison time, or large compensation and that he has to take her hand in marriage (if they man is respectable, but did not ask).

It's up to the father.
Stop being a domesticated lawcuck.

>>510799665 (OP)
You get arrested and sent to prison if you so much as sneeze at shitwood's direction, yet people who are born rich can rape children with no consequences. I'm surprised Americans haven't started executing politicians in the public square, but then again, maybe they are all just cattle to be used.

>>510802825
Killed probably.

>>510799665 (OP)
The problem isn't sexual maturity. It's mental maturity. People normally had babies in their 20s since prehistory. Early-age marriage was only done with arranged marriages, and the child had to be train to be ready for parenthood. People aren't mentally prepared for sex and babies at that age yet. It turns them into rotten parents later in life.

>>510802908
I just don't hang around them anymore, also it will feel weird being seen with them. I had my fair share. 18-23 girls are still hot.

>>510802453
Watch 10,000 CP videos and examine 100,000 CP pictures and get back to me about being Jewish. According to anti-Semites, it's Jewish to lie and deceive and falsify. Falsifying the record by banning access to the evidence is Jewish by that definition.
It's so bad that even experts are not allowed to look. Journalists cannot examine the evidence. Scholars are not allowed to look, except under the supervision of the police state, like at COPINE.

Science is empirical until it reaches the border of child sexuality.

Meanwhile, children themselves are making all the porn. There was something like 10k CP items in 1995, encompassing the entire output of the 20th century. Now millions of videos and images are produced by "children" every year. But this doesn't tempt the curiosity of experts. Instead, they conspire with the police state to demonize the production, find its darkest examples, and force more police state surveillance and thought control into the very fabric of the Internet.

We're at the point where either pedophilia gets normalized to some degree, or we live under a totalitarian state. For pedophiles that's already true. But it's being extended, step by step, to encompass everyone just so Lil Johnny can't whack off on Omegle, and Lil Suzy doesn't show her puss with 3 hairs on Snapchat, which is what they will do with the least provocation, for no money, out of personal desire and interest, because youth are sexual.

>>510802726
i just checked. unrestricted sex is 18 in argentina. if she's 13 there just needs to be a relative or herself accusing you of coercion and you'll be booked as a rapist

Because you are not here to have a serious discussion. You are part of a psyop trying to promote pedophilia here, which is a surefire way to completely destroy the legitimacy of a movement, among white europeans at least.

In my country the age of consent is 16, but, you know, it wouldn't be so bad to raise it to 18 just to help reduce degeneracy, considering we also have literal Pakistani rape gangs that target underage girls. Sex isn't even that important, and why do you need to do it with a 16 year old specifically? Also you are talking in terms of sex not morality and are obviously a degenerate yourself.

We should be getting married in our early 20s and our society should support and encourage young couples as they adjust to married life as our ancestors did for millennia, but boomers threw this culture in the trash in favor of the "sexual revolution" (which at one point promoted pedophilia) and now people are lonely and miserable and indulge in mindless hedonism. We will retvrn to a more chaste culture where girls basically don't have sex until they are married, which west of the Hajnal line in civilized white Germanic countries is in their early 20s because we are more K-selective than other humans.

>>510803022
>prison time
>large compensation
Ok. Since basically no father approves of adult men banging their 14 years old in the current year, what's your problem with these offenders getting prison time and being forced to pay compensation as is currently the status quo?

>>510802946
Only if you were poorer than the girl. No one cared as long as the dude was higher up along the class, in fact everyone cheered their girl going up in life. That's also very present in today's world.

>>510803022
>he has to take her hand in marriage
mohammed pls, go back to somalia

In nature every girl will have children as soon as she can.
Society is sick and tries to stop what's natural. They encourage 40 year old women to have kids who end up autistic and say that's normal.

The age of consent is a political tool to control birthrates. They succeeded at stopping millions of whites from breeding when they are most fertile.

>>510803204
>No one cared as long as the dude was higher up along the class
They sure did. But this is a moot point considering you and all of your likes are the bottom class in this world.

>>510802872
> sex with 14 year old girls isn't the problem
> institutional blackmail is the problem
We agree.

>>510803059
One trip to sub-Saharan Africa or recondite South American tribes blows apart this 20s birthing theory. People start getting horny and leaking lubricants, semen and mestruation, they get married to whichever boy or girl they fool around with and they start cranking out babies.

>>510800126
Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed faggots.

>>510803253
>In nature every girl will have children as soon as she can.
>Society is sick and tries to stop what's natural
Agreed. So you're tedpilled, or are you yet another dysgenic life form fully invested in this unnatural society?

>>510803159
>In my country the age of consent is 16, but, you know, it wouldn't be so bad to raise it to 18 just to help reduce degeneracy, considering we also have literal Pakistani rape gangs that target underage girls.
So why changing aoc sandniggers will stop raping minors?
Do you hear how retarded you sound?

You are effeminate.

>>510801562

No thanks, her bony ass hips would dig into me and hurt.

Plus I don't like curly hair.

>>510803163
You say all agree, yet they don't.
Your argument is false.

Your options is the power in the hand of the state.
What I purpose it's up to the father, not the state.

>>510799665 (OP)
men with loyal virgin wives create kingdoms, lords, heirs, knights, empires and challenge the government.
men with ran through whore wives get divorced, enriching (((divorce lawyers))) and the (((court system))) and women. women are 80% of consumers so (((they))) would rather have the woman absorb your empire though child support, alimony, and asset forfeiture.

tldr: marriage is male to female wealth redistribution humiliation ritual and the woman being a ran through 18 year old by the time you get access to her is part of the plan

>>510799665 (OP)
No fluffy tail, no soft fur, no long ears.

>>510803159
> the age of consent is 16, but, you know, it wouldn't be so bad to raise it to 18 just to help reduce degeneracy
You're the degenerate for thinking the moral failings of others can only be solved by handing more power to the state.
> We should be getting married in our early 20s
Retard, the problem is by the time women get to their early 20s, they've already been riding the cock carousel and are halfway through their masters, eagerly anticipating their email job at a FAANG company.
It's too fucking late.
Early marriage is the only solution.

>>510803163
>boomers simp for their own daughters
This is the big problem. Boomers are the biggest simp generation ever born

>>510799665 (OP)
It's well known that MIGAshills are chabad jews and evangelical christcucks so I'm not even surprised that they're now shilling pedophilia.

>>510799665 (OP)
Nothing wrong with it per se, but younger people tend to be less mature, especially in today's society. Due to that, protecting children from sexual exploitation is necessary.
But if you want to fuck a girl with tiny tits and no curves who's old enough (14-16 in most countries, afaik), there's nothing wrong with that.

>>510803420
>faggot doesn't want a young woman with a perfect body
>checks flag
Ah yes, that checks out. Go worship your obese niggerboons.

>>510803301
>disregarding the grooming, prostitution and kidnapping part to focus on victimizing the politicians
Interesting spin..

>>510803309
I don't think wild niggers are a good example of a good society.

>>510803426
Show me a case where someone's 14 years old got diddled by an adult and the teen's father spoke in defense of the diddler.

>>510803459
>Early marriage is the only solution.
And cousin marriage.

Cousin marriage was banned by the church to make us atomized under the middle ages.
To throw away klan/bloodkin for individualism.

>>510803491
I'm not a boomer and I guarantee you that I would skin you alive and gouge your eyes out if you did anything to my kids.

>>510799665 (OP)
nothing
if the person is 14 it's fine

>>510803544

Oi! Let me see ya cunt loicense, ya cunt!

Bob's your uncle!

>>510803648
okay simp

>>510802449
So your argument isn’t that the teen will be affected in any way, it’s just that you want to gatekeep access to teens?

>>510803515
But
> protecting children from exploitation
becomes
> defining anyone under 18 as a child
> denying children access to sex
> radically narrowing teen's access to sex
> demonizing men attracted to youth
We can protect children from exploitation without doing these things. But we won't because we're trapped in a hysterical mythology created by feminists to pursue their political objectives, which involves demonizing men.

>>510803622
One look at Pakistan shows why not frowning upon cousin marriage is a bad idea. It doesn't need to be criminalized, but it's tragic after consecutive generations.

>>510803612
What do you mean with diddle?
Rape or consent?

Also I said that you father should be the one making the decision, yet here you argue as if he wouldn't know beforehand.

You are a statist, you want your every thought and action governed by other men.
You are weak-minded.

If it is as you say that no father would agree to it, then it would make no difference if it was in the hand of the father.
All this shows is that you want governmental control of everyday life.

>>510803648
you weigh 140 pounds max and have never shot a firearm or benched 2 plates

>>510803665
>here comes the "you can't handle real waman's curves" crowd

>>510803600
Checked, and the point is, you can be very concerned about Epstein without becoming a moralfag about sex with 14 year old girls.
And maybe the whole fiasco is an opportunity to think about where we are as a society when we deny biological realities, thus placing into the hands of institutional blackmailers like Epstein every man who manages to become prominent.
Let's push two updates to our political operating system
> a rethink about the relationship between males and young people, including children, which has gone completely sideways under pernicious feminist attacks
> a Church Committee-style investigation into institutional blackmail, without focusing on particular people

>>510799665 (OP)
You had your chance in high school.
Prime breeding stock is the most gatekept of all human cattle.

>>510803709
Are you hearing voices in your head? What argument? I asked a question.

>>510803738
That is only bad genetics.
Inbreeding just concentrates traits, good or bad.
Interbreeding defuses the traits.

>>510803774
>father should be the one making the decision
Show me a case where someone's 14 years old got diddled by an adult and the teen's father spoke in defense of the diddler.

>>510803738
it's repeated cousin marriage that causes the issue, if you skip a generation the chances of bad outcomes reduces to almost background levels.

>>510803612
It's a tense topic, but shotgun marriages existed for a reason. Nobody wants a groper infiltrating their daughter's prime pussy, but normal people in the past had figured out ways to navigate the issue. We were more rational about this in the past than we are now. The solutions sold to us have caused more problems than they solved.

>>510803912
Zoomers are wholly unqualified to breed though, so for the good of society it should be changed to allow millennials and gen x to breed with them and let the male zoomer gene pool die out.

>>510803778
You'd end up starring in a cartel-style execution video, 100%. I'd probably upload webms to /pol/, too.

>>510803970
If someone fucked my daughter without me knowing I would be mad to, but that is not what we are talking about.

What you are arguing about someone known fucking your daughter or some known.
I'ld gladly take someone that I know than some random nigger from the streets.

>>510804104
>unknown vs known
fixed

>>510803986
>normal people in the past had figured out ways to navigate the issue. We were more rational about this in the past than we are now.
Normal people figured out that they don't want their 14 years olds getting diddled by genetic trash like you so now it's illegal.

>>510804052
ur 5’5 with skinny arms, post body

>>510799665 (OP)
hebephilia is THE CAUSE of hypergamy

>>510804104
What I'm talking about is that your irrelevant take makes no difference because none of the freaks you're defending would ever go to the girl's dad and ask his permission to marry her, nor would any of those dads ever grant it.

>>510804163
abortion exists now so they abort when it happens. it didnt in the past and you couldn't let your daughter raise a bastard child

>>510804262
How?

>>510804262
>hebephilia
There is no such thing. You're a degenerate suffering from normosexual paraphilia.

>>510804052
You want to fuck your daughter and are jealous you raised, fed and clothed her for 20 years for some bussin bussy to enjoy. It's natural, having a daughter cucks your brain

>ITT: Moldovian Chad singlehandedly rekting pedoniggers
Show 'em, bro.

>>>/wsg/5927117

>>510804306
It's surreal watching objectively worthless, bottom tier dysgenics here thinking they would somehow benefit from a system where the parents decide who their daughter is allowed to fuck.

>>510804048
gen x and millenials created zooms though

>>510804312
a teen gaining access to a 30 year old's experience, wealth, lifestyle.
>>510804326
a pubescent is not sexually atypical for another pubescent but it is for an adult.

>ITT: Moldovan Chad singlehandedly rekting pedoniggers
Show 'em, bro.

>>510803912
Nobody had a chance in highschool because youth marriage is defacto banned. Very few early relationships translate to marriage, and few of those have societal support. They're viewed as outliers and probably dangerous, if looked upon nostalgically in retrospect when things work out. But nobody is promoting young people to couple and marry at a young age.
This isn't just about sexual access. It's about the right kind of sexual access. Women left to their own devices destroy society. They don't get married. When they do they divorce. They don't have children. Or when they do they are raising their kids as single moms. That's where we are now. That's why we're having this conversation.
So, no, nobody had a chance in high school, least of all the teen girls to have a proper relationship. Nobody is helping young people couple up. On the contrary, every force aligns itself against that possibility. And if kids manage to have sex, it has to be off the record or people are going to jail.
> you can have sex, but only if
> lists 100 obstacles
> "Sorry anon, but you missed your opportunity!"
When I was a kid I was lectured for having porn and masturbating. Where was the support? Where is the support for socially awkward kids who can't figure it out and need help? Where is PFLAG for getting kids laid? You won't find it. All you find is hysteria and anger and violence and police state tactics.

Meanwhile, browns are all high on lean and fucking on Instagram and nobody cares. This is a WHITE problem which is why it requires a WHITE solution.

>>510802872
> Grooming them into a secret service's prostitution blackmail network to fuck unknown politicians in an island where they're trapped in isn't.

Interesting irony isn’t it? These politicians create these laws that they now have to go around behind everyone’s back to circumvent and then have to go through all kinds of ridiculous gymnastics to suppress the evidence there of. If they simply decriminalized sex there would be no problem. For those who say that women would go up in arms against it they need to remember women are passive propaganda receptacles. If everyone on TV, in all doctors, and all political leaders, and every institution started coming out for something, like they did with Covid, then women by and large would accept it as the new norm. Women follow and political fashions, just like they do clothing fashions, slavishly. Almost every woman is a collectivist and will do everything in her power to stay in good graces with the collective whatever that collective ideology is doing.

>>510804263
If your argument that it makes no difference then why are you so opposed to it?

>>510804372
oh boy I haven't gotten to use this webm to describe a thread in a while

>>510799665 (OP)
Nothing really wrong with it in a natural sense. Its just that women are practically children mentally until they reach like 25 years of age, there is also a huge cultural barrier between young people and older men, women wont be having kids before 30 anyways in todays climate.

Its not that "hebe" cannot be sexually attractive, its just that you are a better man that a child fucker arent you? She wont be your tradwife anyways you will just encourage the dick caurosel behavior in the young women you fornicate.

>>510803204
They sure did. Hooking up with a rich guy and marrying him has been the time honored fast track way for a woman to get to the top of the social hierarchy. You could literally have a girl living in an impoverished family, who is literally nothing have some rich guy fall in love with her and then immediately she’s at the top of the social rank. It’s incredible.

>>510804569
>If your argument that it makes no difference then why are you so opposed to it?
It's not even so much that I'm "opposed" to it. I'm just pointing out its utter irrelevance to the actual situation being discussed.

>>510804163
In One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest, the protagonist is in the mental hospital for having sex with a 15 year old girl. He's the protagonist, the character on some level we're supposed to be rooting for.
Now if a man even so much as _expresses_ desire for a 15 year old, he's condemned to social death.
The way people deal with this now is nothing like how they dealt with it in the past. The difference is not that people finally decided they had enough. The difference is that all discourse around this topic is driven by feminist politics, their concepts, seeking their ends.
That's what's new since the 1980s. But it's been with us so long that it just seems like normality to you. When you look into the past, all you see is the present.

>>510804531
>yuo are of child rapings weak sperm of diddlings!!!
What a great way to argue your point.

>>510804524
Normophilia is degenerate. Normophiles like you defend homosexuality and bestiality with niggers. You'd be fucking dogs and geriatrics if jews made it normal.

>>510804739
Well all you are arguing is for more governmental control of peoples lives.

>>510804759
>In One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest, the protagonist ...
The absolute state of this board...

>>510803612
Very common throughout the Middle East and Asia, though not sex out of marriage, but rather the parents, including the father, selling off their daughter to an old guy for a considerable sum. So yes, it’s as old as time.

>>510804839
>Well all you are arguing is for more governmental control of peoples lives.
This is your schizophrenia talking. At no point did I defend statism.

>>510804904
>Very common throughout the Middle East and Asia
>though not sex out of marriage
Multiple levels of simultaneous concession.

You incels can barely score a slampig slag and you bitch about not fucking 15 year olds? lmao, why the fuck would they ever even touch your penis? it's CHAD only under 20.

>>510804839
Moldovan flag isn't arguing that it's bad to fuck 14 year olds, it's that we're all dysgenic trash who wouldn't get on with one without commiting sexual predation.

>>510804809
I'm not defending from a social norm stance.
Puberty develops not only physical traits but mental capacity for sexual informed consent.
Taking advantage of a pubescent is akin to animal abuse.

>>510804594
She grabs him, drags him, hits him, he defends himself, and they turn on him? Wow!

>>510805024
>retarded normophile LLM-tier talking points
Normophilia is degenerate. Normophiles like you defend homosexuality and bestiality with niggers. You'd be fucking dogs and geriatrics if jews made it normal.

>>510804489
Arranged marriages benefit non-Chads. Letting parents decide who their 15 year old daughter marries at 16 is a net benefit to society, because it ensures more people get married, increases the birth rate, solving 1,000,000 other issues. Arranged marriage extricates the logic of courtship away from hypergamy, giving males who _appear_ to have less value a chance.
The premise of my argument is that hypergamy falsifies reality by denying value to objectively valuable males. If you think women's judgment about sexual fitness is correct, then you are a promoter of hypergamy, and basically view the world from a female perspective.

>>510799665 (OP)
As long as you kill all of the Jews for God. Which you of course will.

>>510805088
Let's get the state out of the picture and let communities decide what to do with you if you get caught sexually propositioning a 12 years old. I'm sure society will see the benefit of you trying to fuck their kids and the soundness of your position without the government needing to intervene for your safety. :^)

Although it's being ironed out of society, lower class and higher class populations still have girls sexually active from around 12+. I as a man started to get horny as fuck around 14 and would have happily had sex with any woman older than me but I wouldn't have understood the power dynamics at play. The gay community is filled with age gap relationships but gay people are initiated earlier and understand that the young ones are trading their looks for money or drugs. If we let you loli fiends start fucking 8 year old girls you're going to do unspeakable physical and mental damage. Mostly because you're fucking weirdos. I've been through the care system and in lower class circles my whole life and know plenty of go's that got nonce's by older guys or family members and they have mental health issues. They're unstable, take drugs, hyper sexual, addicted to bad men, sympathetic to the guys that abused them and often will say shit like I don't mind if my 12 year old daughter has sex with older guys cos I wanted it. Until you get old enough to be able to understand then you should be having sex with people around your age because it's there's a social element to it as well. A lot of younger girls do go for older guys but theres a cut off. 18 year olds in their peak find 35 year olds trying to fuck them to be weirdos, but a guy in his mid 20s not so much.

So in conclusion no. 4chan users shouldn't be able to fuck kids. Not now. Not ever.

>>510803778
I hate fake gym culture so much. You posers will never be real athletes.

>>510805071
If you knew what "normophilia" meant you'd know I already countered your claim.
I'll take your strawman to further your understanding though.
Homosexuality is against the function of your form. Normalizing homosexuality is a social contagion that promotes the destruction of the human form.

>>510804636
You're assuming anyone with hebephile desire is a "child fucker", which is just a stereotype.
First of all, hebes are pubescent, which means they are mature enough to reproduce. There has to be a rational conversation about this, not just dumping these people into the "child" category.
Second, who says a sexual relationship with a hebe has to be some crass, disgusting, disturbing, purely self-serving thing?
I'm arguing for youth marriage. We should let things proceed to a point, then require marriage. Having sex with your wife isn't being a child fucker. And most 14 year old girls aren't children. They're women.
We need to stop infantalizing young people, while at the same time giving them hand holds and protections which do not in and of themselves deny them access to sexual relationships.

>>510802677

Cunt.

>>510805353
Nothing you say matters, dumb normophile. Imagine not being sexually attracted to clear markers of youth and fertility.

>>510805262
>rants about actual pedophile breeding strategies
>shifts blame to "loli fiends" and "4chan users"
Typical leftist projection, holy shit.

>>510804906
Why do you argue about meaningless shit then?
I do not believe it will be voted in, but there is nothing wrong with giving family and people more right to choose what they want and how to live life which is not harmful to the collective.

If the father agrees to a 50 year old man marrying his 14 daughter that should not be a problem.
The government has nothing to do with it.

>>510805447
>There has to be a rational conversation about this, not just dumping these people into the "child" category.
They're getting dumped into the "child" category because that's how parents feel about their teens with respect to this question. There is nothing "irrational" about a parent wishing to shield his children from greasy subhumans.

>who says a sexual relationship with a hebe has to be some crass, disgusting, disturbing, purely self-serving thing?
Post a pic of your face and let's test this.

>>510805610
Because >>510804958

>>510805610
>there is nothing wrong with giving family and people more right to choose what they want and how to live life
I agree. See >>510805229

>>510805481
The logical age of attraction leading to pregnancy is 24 as it has the best pregnancy outcomes on average according to currently available data.

>>510805262
> I've been through the care system and in lower class circles my whole life and know plenty of go's that got nonce's by older guys or family members and they have mental health issues.

There it is. Sampling bias.

K, never mind. Everyone here sucks except for me.

>>510805690
>logical age of attraction
Ok, I thought you were a regular retard but you're a broken LLM stringing tokens without rhyme or reason.

>>510805229
> Get the state out of the bedroom
> Let society decide
Then we agree.
You'd be surprised how flexible society actually is, because reality is complex, and people naturally weigh various factors when deciding what's good for them and what's not.
Keeping most men out of the pants of 12 year olds is probably a good thing, and we should gatekeep. But gatekeeping has almost nothing to do with the system we have now, which is ideologically motivated and backed by a police state.

Lol you guys are retarded. The older the woman the more likely the child will be born defective. Stop falling for jew shit. Have kids young or be replaced.

>>510805710
I smashed your Moldovan into the dirt so hard he's accusing me of being a llm programmed by a "normophile"
kek

>>510805760
>You'd be surprised how flexible society actually is
You'd be surprised what physical mangling you can experience before you die once the violence of the state isn't there to protect you from the consequences of trying to do nasty things to people's 12 years olds.

Here’s how to solve the pedophilia issue overnight: when someone is being tried for having underage sex, make the jury take a polygraph test and if they themselves are sexually aroused by the girl, then the charges get dismissed. That way we can still keep locking up real pedos who have sex with prepubescent children, while letting men freely have sex with actual breeding age females the way nature intended.

>>510800774
>Pederasty is functional
No. No homos allowed to breath air.

>>510805948
Here's how to solve the murder issue overnight: when someone is being tried for murder, make the jury take a polygraph test and see if they themselves feel intense anger at whatever caused the murdering nig to chimp out.

>>510805229
Girls used to marry at 12..... You are a cuck. The fact is most women are not getting married or having kids. They are wasting their youths whoring themselves and murdering their children.

This also effects the men, the data is very clear. ,50% of women by 2030 no husband no children. What about all the men who would have married them provided they were virgins and young?

This is a jewish attack on society. Throughout history most girls got married in their teens to older men. And it worked. Society fourished.

le sigh...
too old

>>510805262
> looks at worst case scenario
There should be lots of rules around relationships between adults and young people. It is possible to exploit young people, especially with drugs, or use social pressure. These things should be absent from these relationships.
But not every inducement is exploitation. And not every sexual relationship is exploitation or rape, which is how it's regarded now.
We need rules of thumb that enable us to look into a relationship and decide whether it's productive or not. And that rule can't just be age.
Age is a factor, but not the only factor.
If older people are helping younger people, we should allow it. We should allow the space for men to imagine for themselves a form of helping that enables them to have the relationships they desire.
But we don't have that. Instead, we have spaces of exploitation, born out of a blanket denial of the biological reality of male desire. We don't accept the desire, so we create no space, so we do not shape that space. All we're left with is police state surveillance and exploitation, and then we're surprised when things go wrong.

>>510805760
> Keeping most men out of the pants of 12 year olds…

I see this term a lot. They don’t want to get into their pants they want to get into their wombs to reproduce. This then raises all sorts of interesting questions of why did nature program females to be impregnatable at that age if they weren’t meant to be impregnatable? Regarding the “damage“, which I assume is referring to emotional distress, that’s against the backdrop of a society which deeply criminalizes, shame, and ostracizes that type of relationship. Curiously, if society, pivoted and celebrated a girl getting married off young and having babies then amazingly the so-called “damage “goes away! Curious how that works.

>>510806087
Since you're obviously right, you don't need the state and its oppressive feminist laws to arbitrate this issue. Let people decide what to do with you if you get caught trying to diddle 12 years olds. :^)

>>510800126
>she's 1 second younger than you sick fuck

>>510805262
>having sex with people around your age because it's there's a social element to it as well
Wrong. No one should be having sex outside or marriage as because as soon as a women gains sexual experience she becomes unmarriagable.

Only older men can lead and provide a family.

>>510806048
What a retarded analogy. The point is that sex with sexually developed females shouldn’t be a crime at all, but different girls develop at different ages so you can’t use an age as the definition without needlessly banning sex for people it shouldn’t be banned for.

>>510805948
I’ve always asked the same question myself. What is the base rate? That should be the basic psychological foundational question to this whole issue. If 90% of men experience intense arousal with watching two oil down 13 year-old girls, hugging and kissing while they’re wearing bikinis, then there’s your base rate right there. That then turns the whole concept of what is normal upside down on its head.

>>510806137
>They don’t want to get into their pants they want to get into their wombs to reproduce
Yes, I'm sure your interest is primarily reproductive and you'd be willing to sell your entire Steam collection to raise the kid.

>>510802728
>The sexes should be segregated in school.

This is perhaps one of the more important sentences to be written in the whole thread.

Unisex education over the generation ends up catering to women, and so the boys will become more and more effeminate, making them disgusting to girls. Thus most who conscientiously finish education as a rule have trouble finding stable relationships without kucking more and more.

And also why the collective female desire to prefer criminals and invaders to the effette male natives of their own civilization, as the men are individually stronger and more powerful in comparison to those who ignored or did not go through such a program.

The reason the ruling elites, if they are aware of this, are in favour of leaning into this phenomenon is the deliberate sabotage of any competitions to their own progeny who can have private or exclusive education and instruction.

>>510806120
reverse the sex.
old women going after pubescent men.
same thing?

>>510805639
Wrong. It was normal throughout all history. Only modern jewish propaganda has changed that. Boomers are retards

>>510806163
puberty ends at 18 on average.