I’ve noticed more young men becoming fixated on the idea that only women with no past are worthy of marriage. This obsession with purity is disguised as traditionalism, but in truth, it’s rooted in fear and disillusionment. It drives men away from relationships and family life, leading to bitterness and loneliness instead of strength and stability. The truth is, most people have a past, and that’s not a flaw. What matters is whether someone is ready to build a life with you. Women are not our adversaries. They are essential partners in the work of preserving culture, raising children, and creating a future worth living in.

If we care about the survival of our civilisation, we need to let go of unrealistic ideals and start encouraging commitment, forgiveness, and responsibility. Families aren’t formed through perfection but through partnership and perseverance. The future won’t be won by men who sit on the sidelines with purity tests. It will be built by those who show up, take responsibility, and do the hard, necessary work of building homes and communities. The future does not belong to the pure. It belongs to the builders.

>Women rights is le the problem

I dont see yemen india iran leading the world
Any contributions in the modern world have been made by countries that uphold women's rights. Debunk this, incels
In the past 25 years, the tiny country of Switzerland, which upholds women's rights, has contributed more to the world in terms of innovation and invention than all the countries without women's rights combined

>>510802798 (OP)
>only women with no past are worthy of marriage
Correct, non-virgin whores are only eligible for concubinage.

>>510802798 (OP)
Men with no life experience trying to find women without life experience as well. Perfect fit.

>>510802798 (OP)
>I've noticed that blonde men are obsessed with redheads regardless of what the redhead has done in the past, her innocence and beauty can never fade.
ftfy

Once we have artificial wombs we will be free. We will still have robowives and robodaughters, but they will not vote for wokeness.

>>510802798 (OP)
>jewflag
opinion in the trash goes

For me it's less about being a roastie and more about the emotional trauma that women carry from every relationship. They hold that shit for the rest of their life and it ain't good

>>510802798 (OP)
Nope faggot. I have far more stability when I'm not in a relationship with some cunt who always has a reason why we to spend my money on bullshit. And like it's always an emergency.

>>510802798 (OP)
Not my problem
I will not get pussy destroyed by BBC and Jews dicks.
Let them rot

>>510802798 (OP)
Tl;Dr
Yeah relationships have become that bad that yeah it absolutely is crucial to find a girl who has not only never fucked anyone else but probably hasn't even dated anyone else.
>T.Married a virgin who STILL talks about some random dude she ALMOST dated in highschool 10 years ago.
No it's all fucking over

>>510802798 (OP)
If your civilization needs me to marry some used up, debt ridden, diseased, medicated, vaxxed whore who can ruin my life whenever she wants, that civilization deserves to fall.

>>510802798 (OP)
No one is saying you should totally abstain from nonvirgins, just that it is a bad sign, which it is, it is a statement of fact.

>we need to let go of unrealistic ideals
At the moment, with all the degeneracy and simps it is actually feasible to find a virgin tradwife, because of the lack of interest in such women. It is difficult of course, they have to work hard and probably move to another town and work on themselves to stop acting like a cringy bratty teenager and be a desirable tradhusband, however it is possible.

I like my women with experience and I will eat them out

>>510803376
I bet your favorite food is also a roast beef sandwhich.

>>510802798 (OP)
Women with no past.
Kike flag op, are these women clones or something like that?

>>510802798 (OP)
No your a jew and its good proapganda to prevent more hoedom.

>>510802798 (OP)
You're either a roastie or a beta male coping with the fact that he married a roastie

>>510802798 (OP)
>it’s rooted in fear and disillusionment
Nope. Rooted in evolutionary biology. Saying something is okay over and over does not change biology.

>>510802798 (OP)
Only women with a tail are worthy of marriage.

>>510802798 (OP)
>I dont see yemen india iran leading the world
They're not white. The US and Europe flourished when it valued chastity and Christianity (and when their populations were European)

>>510802798 (OP)
>bruh just marry a woman who fucked a hundred guys and has a gaping anus and loose vagina and STDs

NO. I WILL NOT.

But how can Yemen and Iran step ahead when the jews and Americans constantly sabotage them?

They're not even allowed to have a nuclear research program.

>daily roast apologist
Still not dating used good sluts

kek
https://youtu.be/DGykoceZGtA

>1PBTID
1PBTID
>1PBTID
1PBTID

>>510802798 (OP)
Yes and no.
First, we need to acknowledge that most people on this board just want a "tradwife" because they want a second mother who does chores while they do nothing all day. The same people who say NPNW and can't provide if they wanted to are unironically the same ones who want tradwives.

HOWEVER saying that any contributions in the modern world have been made by countries that uphold womens' rights is anecdotal at best.
First, we'd have to agree on a definition of "modern". What time period do you propose?
Then, what kind of womens' rights are we talking about?
Even if you could answer these questions, it would still beg the question of how exactly womens' rights and these contributions to society in any country (as to be defined by you) are connected to each other. Unless a majority of these inventions or innovations are a direct result of female empowerment, I would argue that the claim is in itself invalid.
And now if I wanted to be really unfair, I could - myself - offer anecdotal examples like gender studies and esoteric mumbojumbo or pseudosciences predominantly pushed by women to make an invalid counterclaim of my own.

>tl;dr I agree that /pol/acks are incel faggots, but your second claim is whack.

>>510803429
Love a roast beef sandwich

>>510803145
/thread

>>510802798 (OP)
>yemen india iran

The only living parts of the world are indeed, leading it. It's why you import them.

>>510802798 (OP)

> I’ve noticed more young men becoming fixated on the idea that only women with no past are worthy of marriage.

Not with ‘no past’ OP, just not whores!

>>510805061
>>510802798 (OP)
no man wants an "Alpha Woman". Egotistical Narcissist women who have a hunger for power never live well, they always need outside stimulants just to live normally. Men want a submissive wife who just wants to cook tasty food, clean their cozy home, and raise the babies when you're at work.
>Men want another mom in their wife
We don't want second mothers because no woman will ever replace your mom unless you had a shitty mom in which case you just have a nice wife, not a new mom. You don't fuck your mom, but you do sleep with your wife.
>yemen india iran
thinking USA is at the top when everyone is a literal slave to the Jew is disingenuous. You have to included divorce statistics because women might get married in the USA but their marriages rarely last or even go smoothly

>>510803376
>I like putting my mouth where a hundred dicks were

>>510802798 (OP)
Yes. No hymen no diamond.
>>510803376
Horrifying

>>510802798 (OP)

ITS GONNA FUCK UP THE ECONOMY

>>510802798 (OP)
>>only women with no past are worthy of marriage
100% correct. Now neck yourself eggcell roastie.